Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

TPI pump on a carb...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
TPI pump on a carb...

Anyone ever have problems running the stock TPI pump with a regulator?

My cars getting barely 8mpg....I've been advancing and retarding the engine like crazy trying to find a spot it likes with no success. The pressure out of the mallory 3 port regulator is a steady 7PSI....which should be fine. I dunno...I'm just trying to find any reason why I might not be getting good fuel milage....thought it might be possible the TPI pump is just sending way too much fuel into the carb even though the pressure seems right.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
6 psi would probably be better. But, as long as the fuel bowl levels are staying where they should be, it isn't sending too much fuel to the carb.

Places to look include ignition (proper spark, proper mechanical and vacuum advance), jetting, and right foot pressure.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #3  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
The only question mark I have is vacuum advance....I don't understand how it works. It says it came set for 10* @ 10"WC...and it's adjustable...but I have no idea how much the adjusting it does. I don't know if 1/4 turn retards it 1* or 5*, and accel was no help whatsoever. The car was pinging, so I retarded the intial timing, now there is no pinging at all any time, my MPG went from like 7.7 to like 8.5 But that is still crap....the engine does ping....do I need to keep retarding?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
maroguy1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: West Allis, WI
Car: 85 iroc & 81 sc
Engine: 357 tpi 350 4bbl
Transmission: 700r4/ richmond 4speed
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.45/3.42 8.5"
Kind of a far out idea but I know my 81 camaro needed colder plugs. It use to ping when it would run hot. Also check your choke to make sure it isn't closing.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
FullMonte84SS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Allen, Texas
Car: 1984 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
running a carb, you need more volume with less pressure. the fuel bowls need to be full, not under pressure. a carburetor uses the venturi priciple where it pulls what it needs from the bowls. if you run this setup you can have the right amout of pressure (6-7 psi) but not enough volume. this is how I understand it. if anyone knows better, please correct. it's very possible that it will work, but not very well.

-Mike
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Nothing wrong with the volume produced by a stock in-tank pump. If pressure is being maintained, that's not the problem. (Think about it: How would too little volume cause poor gas mileage?)

On the vacuum advance: What you're adjusting is the force the spring places on the diaphragm, or to put it another way, how much vacuum it takes to produce the full advance from the vacuum. Adjusting it in means it takes more vacuum to produce the 10 degrees advance, adjusting it out means less vacuum. The only way it would keep it from giving the full advance is if you adjusted it in so much that the engine doesn't produce enough vacuum to give full advance.

The basics of timing adjustment: You set the total mechanical advance to produce best WOT power (adjustment made with the vacuum advance disconnected). For SBC's, that's typically in the 34-36 degree range. You adjust the base or idle advance to keep the starter from kicking back and produce a good idle - this is typically 8-12 degrees, again without the vacuum advance hooked up. (Obviously, in order to get the proper advance at both idle & high RPMs, you need to adjust the amount of mechanical advance the distributor produces, which is easier with aftermarket distributors such as an MSD ProBillet than it is with a factory HEI.) You adjust the vacuum advance to give the most low-load advance possible without pinging on light load - this is typically a trial & error process.

Improperly adjusted vacuum advance, or adjusting the idle or total advance to compensate for an inproperly adjusted vacuum advance, are good ways to produce poor mileage. You want the most cruise advance possible without pinging to maximize economy.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #7  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Someone told me that the advertised 10* @ 10" was camshaft degrees, which is HALF of engine RPM. Meaning it's 20* full vacuum advance at 20" WC.

Basically, I have base timing around 7*, WOT is fine, but MPG is bad. I had been changing the initial timing since I couldn't understand how the vacuum advance adjustment works.

Does that mean if I keep screwing the vacuum advance chamber in, I can essentially limit the amount of vacuum advance the distributor will give out? I'm not pinging under cruise or WOT, but I'm guessing I still have too much vacuum advance at cruise. I don't want to mess with initial that much, since WOT is where it should be, with 24* mechanical, and 7* initial, I'm right around 31-32* @ WOT, which is where I want to be.

I appreciate your post 57, it was very helpful. (and everyone else)
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #8  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by StealthElephant
Someone told me that the advertised 10* @ 10" was camshaft degrees, which is HALF of engine RPM. Meaning it's 20* full vacuum advance at 20" WC.
Half the crankshaft degrees, yes.

20 degrees vacuum advance is about right. You can limit it mechanically (someone had a post on that somewhere on this board, recently), but that shouldn't be necessary.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Well my screwing the adjustment in, it should allow me to lower the total advance I get correct?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #10  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you're not pinging under cruise, why do you want to reduce the vacuum advance?

As previously stated, screwing in the vacuum adjustment more will only limit the amount of timing if the vacuum required to provide full advance is higher than what the engine produces. It doesn't provide a direct limit in timing.

Last edited by five7kid; Feb 26, 2004 at 05:53 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 06:05 PM
  #11  
StealthElephant's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
From: Woodbury, NJ
Car: 87' Iroc
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Ahh....so what should I do so I can exactly control my total vacuum advance?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grant2k
TBI
17
Jul 10, 2018 04:01 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 25, 2015 08:05 AM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.