87 Formula Comp. Carb to regular straight carb
87 Formula Comp. Carb to regular straight carb
A buddy of mine has an 87 firebird formula with a 305. The engine is carburated and has a computer. I told him to use the engine harness and just unplug the sensors and stuff. He wants to put a whole new top end in it and change the carb to a holley or edelbrock and not use the computer. Was I right, or is there more to it than that. Someone help me out here so he will shut up. He also wants to know if he has to change his gauges or not.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
The computer also controls the ignition and converter lock up (if auto) so these things will have to be swapped out as well. Do a search and you'll find numerous threads that advise keeping the ccc-qjet and ecm. Whole lot of work for little or no additional performance.
If his car is an LG4 he'll need to tackle the exhaust before any other mod makes a diff.
If his car is an LG4 he'll need to tackle the exhaust before any other mod makes a diff.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 21
From: Rochester NY
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11
I have a 1984 Z28 and I just dropped in a 355. I unplugged all the sensors for the computer and the car started and ran fine and then I took out the computer . All I had to do is put in a tc lockupswitch in and nothing else.As for the guages you should be fine there not hooked to the computer either. I would chage them there usally not accurate.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
I have a 1984 Z28 and I just dropped in a 355. I unplugged all the sensors for the computer and the car started and ran fine and then I took out the computer . All I had to do is put in a tc lockupswitch in and nothing else.As for the guages you should be fine there not hooked to the computer either. I would chage them there usally not accurate.
Imagine how it would run with everything working right...
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Whether that is a smart thing to do depends completely upon the use and other equipment of the car. If it is primarily a daily driver, the Holley doesn't make much sense (in my opinion, the Edelbrock doesn't make any sense under any circumstance - and that's a technical opinion, not a personal bias).
First, we'll assume this is a daily driver with an automatic transmission. He's already got the ideal carburetor, and any change would have the same effect on performance as flushing 6 $100 bills down the toilet. The effect on economy would be on top of that. The effect on driveability will be mostly the tweaking required to get an aftermarket carb to operate properly.
If the above assumption isn't correct, we'll modify it to daily driver with a manual transmission. In this case, the q-jet isn't ideal from a performance standpoint, but it is still the better carb from the economy standpoint. You could argue for a Holley/Demon mechanical secondary carb, but the Edelbrock or a vacuum secondary Holley/Demon is definately no improvement over the q-jet.
Finally, if neither of the above assumptions are correct, and this is a weekend warrior/strip/track car, then for the sake of consisency (ET racing) or autox, the Holley/Demon mechanical secondary is again the choice.
The carb is the absolute very last thing to change on these cars to improve performance. Until you get that into your head, you are chasing your tail and flushing $'s.
First, we'll assume this is a daily driver with an automatic transmission. He's already got the ideal carburetor, and any change would have the same effect on performance as flushing 6 $100 bills down the toilet. The effect on economy would be on top of that. The effect on driveability will be mostly the tweaking required to get an aftermarket carb to operate properly.
If the above assumption isn't correct, we'll modify it to daily driver with a manual transmission. In this case, the q-jet isn't ideal from a performance standpoint, but it is still the better carb from the economy standpoint. You could argue for a Holley/Demon mechanical secondary carb, but the Edelbrock or a vacuum secondary Holley/Demon is definately no improvement over the q-jet.
Finally, if neither of the above assumptions are correct, and this is a weekend warrior/strip/track car, then for the sake of consisency (ET racing) or autox, the Holley/Demon mechanical secondary is again the choice.
The carb is the absolute very last thing to change on these cars to improve performance. Until you get that into your head, you are chasing your tail and flushing $'s.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,801
Likes: 21
From: Rochester NY
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11
If he is getting a bran new top end with nothing computer controlled then there is no need to for the ecm or any sensors but temp. I have a 650 mighty demon and a mechanical hei distributor with a tc lock up switch and the car runs very well.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Again, getting a whole new top end with nothing computer controlled may not be money well spent. Depends upon more than just replacing things to be replacing things.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM






