WUTS BETTER 160* OR 180*
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Oviedo,Florida
Car: 86' Trans am
Engine: 85 LG4-non cc carb(building a 350)
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4,vette servo,2200stall
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
WUTS BETTER 160* OR 180*
WUTS BETTER FOR A 305 CARB A 160* OR 180* THERMOSTAT
-MIKE
-MIKE
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by xgtharo86x
WUTS BETTER FOR A 305 CARB A 160* OR 180* THERMOSTAT
-MIKE
-MIKE
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
The engine itself (assuming close to stock) should run around 190-210*... whatever thermostat will allow it to do that will work.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Car: 85 IROC
Engine: L-69 305
Transmission: T-5 manual
what would be considerd to cool
i have a 160 in mine and on the highway i run at app. 165 even if its 90* out
would i be better off with a 180?
i have a 160 in mine and on the highway i run at app. 165 even if its 90* out
would i be better off with a 180?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post