16149396 vs 1227727
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Doghouse
Car: Pro Stadium Tough Truck
Engine: Buick V6 272 cu in
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: Broken most of the time
16149396 vs 1227727
While searching for some info I stumbled across this information. If this is true does that mean that I can run $8D on a 16149396 ecm?
Info found at Untitled Document
"...Cars with the 91-93 3.4L DOHC V6 use a 16149396 PCM, which is identical to the 1227727 ECM, but with additional SRAM installed into a space which is left empty on the 1227727..."
Info found at Untitled Document
"...Cars with the 91-93 3.4L DOHC V6 use a 16149396 PCM, which is identical to the 1227727 ECM, but with additional SRAM installed into a space which is left empty on the 1227727..."
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Car: 1993 Pontiac Grand prix
Engine: 2.8/3100
Transmission: 4T60-E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
no the i/o are different
you can see for yourself here
GM P4 ECM Crossreference
look at the schematics for both, and i/o schematics
i wish you could do that, becuase i would run 8f on my 9396
you can see for yourself here
GM P4 ECM Crossreference
look at the schematics for both, and i/o schematics
i wish you could do that, becuase i would run 8f on my 9396
Scot
Why don't you think it will work? They are identicle ECMs except for the added 2k of SRAM.
Scot
----------
Well, sorta 8F, it started out as 8F.Scot
Last edited by ScotSea; Oct 22, 2006 at 07:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dave w
DIY PROM
2
Jun 11, 2009 01:57 PM
