Any programs out there that will create Volumetric Efficiency Table?
Any programs out there that will create Volumetric Efficiency Table?
Well i'm after a program that will create an Volumetric Efficiency table that is suitable for my engine. I'm not really sure how they work. Even if someone can explain to me it would be great.
I'm in the process of programming an 808 ecu and i'd just like to have everything configured right.
Are there any good sites out there that will teach be about all this? I am very interested in all of it. I'm just a beginner though.
Thanks alot
I'm in the process of programming an 808 ecu and i'd just like to have everything configured right.
Are there any good sites out there that will teach be about all this? I am very interested in all of it. I'm just a beginner though.
Thanks alot
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 406 Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Bringing this back from the dead.... Is the VE table is creates good for anything? Is there any way to determine "optimum" spark information based on engine specs similar to the way Desktop Dyno can create a VE table?
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Rockport, TX
Car: 1980 Jeep CJ7
Engine: AMC 360 with GM TBI
Transmission: TF727 set for kill...let's get it on!!!
The only drawbacks to this that I can see are:
1.) DD2000 only gives a single dataset for VE vs RPM
2.) There is no way to get it to generate a VE vs MAP table that I can see
3.) You have to take the DD2000 numbers and convert them to numbers that can be put into your VE% tables and then burned to a chip.
Does anyone here know of anyway around this? What about Panalyze? Doesn't it give some sort of VE stuff?
Nevermind...I just looked at Panalyze...the newest version I could find. It just takes the csv file and parses it into a more meaningful form.
Now, if you look at Craig's VEPhD, you can adapt it to just about any ECM. I started doing that but I haven't quite finished it yet. All I am doing is removing the rows and columns that I don't need for my VE tables. When I finish it, I'll let you know how it works.
1.) DD2000 only gives a single dataset for VE vs RPM
2.) There is no way to get it to generate a VE vs MAP table that I can see
3.) You have to take the DD2000 numbers and convert them to numbers that can be put into your VE% tables and then burned to a chip.
Does anyone here know of anyway around this? What about Panalyze? Doesn't it give some sort of VE stuff?
Nevermind...I just looked at Panalyze...the newest version I could find. It just takes the csv file and parses it into a more meaningful form.
Now, if you look at Craig's VEPhD, you can adapt it to just about any ECM. I started doing that but I haven't quite finished it yet. All I am doing is removing the rows and columns that I don't need for my VE tables. When I finish it, I'll let you know how it works.
Last edited by jeepguy553; Apr 3, 2004 at 11:27 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Scott_92RS
Bringing this back from the dead.... Is the VE table is creates good for anything? Is there any way to determine "optimum" spark information based on engine specs similar to the way Desktop Dyno can create a VE table?
Bringing this back from the dead.... Is the VE table is creates good for anything? Is there any way to determine "optimum" spark information based on engine specs similar to the way Desktop Dyno can create a VE table?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Grumpy
When you get to working in the advanced lab areas at, at least the big two, ie GM, and Ford, they have some simulation stuff that gets close. Other then that nothing, that'd I'd trust. A few years ago I bought some real expensive software, and the results were always based on threshold detonation tuning. And for that you can just tune for 93, dump in some 116, and then add 4* and be close, IMB
When you get to working in the advanced lab areas at, at least the big two, ie GM, and Ford, they have some simulation stuff that gets close. Other then that nothing, that'd I'd trust. A few years ago I bought some real expensive software, and the results were always based on threshold detonation tuning. And for that you can just tune for 93, dump in some 116, and then add 4* and be close, IMB
If you had a buisness I would recommend Virtual 4-stroke. It's not cheap but it'll give you accurate results.
For the money, I'd rather purchase an engine dyno with some good data-aq like NI Labview
. Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM





