Any reason I should leave the BLM update amount at 2?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Car: 89 Turbo Trans Am and lots of non-3rd gens
Engine: 231 SFI Turbo's, LT4, LT1
Transmission: 2004r, 4L60E
Any reason I should leave the BLM update amount at 2?
Any reason I should leave the BLM update amount set to the factory 2 in the TPI $8D? Which means the BLMs can only increment or decrement 2 units at a time, from 128 to 126 or 130...
Why not set it to '1' so it can go from 128 to 127 or 129 for finer fueling adjustments??
Why not set it to '1' so it can go from 128 to 127 or 129 for finer fueling adjustments??
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
From: great lakes
are we sure thats not blm update intervals IE 2 seconds ?alot of the later p4 code ive noticed use a 2 or so second updates for blm and pushes alot of fuel trim correction of to the intergrator. which editor are you using ?
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, IN
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: L98
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 7.625 10 bolt/3.73s
My BLM is at 129 at idle so mine will move in increments of one. So if it is seconds, why not have it update every second?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Car: 89 Turbo Trans Am and lots of non-3rd gens
Engine: 231 SFI Turbo's, LT4, LT1
Transmission: 2004r, 4L60E
Originally posted by funstick
are we sure thats not blm update intervals IE 2 seconds ?alot of the later p4 code ive noticed use a 2 or so second updates for blm and pushes alot of fuel trim correction of to the intergrator. which editor are you using ?
are we sure thats not blm update intervals IE 2 seconds ?alot of the later p4 code ive noticed use a 2 or so second updates for blm and pushes alot of fuel trim correction of to the intergrator. which editor are you using ?
I set the value to 1, now I see 127, 129, etc..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post