pulse width(730 ecm)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
I explained of it in this post ...
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=214156
Basically:
GMS of Air / CYL = ((MAP - EGR part press) * CYL VOL)/((MAT + 233) * 128)) * VE
BPW = GMS AIR / (AFR * Injector Flow)
However, there are more adders/subtractors like Acceleration Enrichment, Start Up Enrichment, Injector Pulse Width Correction vs. Battery Voltage, Open Loop change, etc. Also don't forget that the BLM and INT modify it too.
Tim
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=214156
Basically:
GMS of Air / CYL = ((MAP - EGR part press) * CYL VOL)/((MAT + 233) * 128)) * VE
BPW = GMS AIR / (AFR * Injector Flow)
However, there are more adders/subtractors like Acceleration Enrichment, Start Up Enrichment, Injector Pulse Width Correction vs. Battery Voltage, Open Loop change, etc. Also don't forget that the BLM and INT modify it too.
Tim
I asked because the pulse width was 4.5ish msec at idle when cold. the pulse width goes down to 2.5ish msec once warmed. So I'm trying to figure out if the ve tables are still far off and closed loop is lowering my p/w by 100% OR if the open loop coolant stuff needs leaned out. There is a few test I'll run tomorrow and then I'll know what table(s) is reducing pw. I do know that the ve table is still off some. The engine is way rich at cold startup(and still a bit rich once warmed). The engine idles rough when cold. I really need to get off my butt and get an ecm bench.....
thanks,
Tim
thanks,
Tim
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by 11sORbust
I asked because the pulse width was 4.5ish msec at idle when cold. the pulse width goes down to 2.5ish msec once warmed. So I'm trying to figure out if the ve tables are still far off and closed loop is lowering my p/w by 100% OR if the open loop coolant stuff needs leaned out. There is a few test I'll run tomorrow and then I'll know what table(s) is reducing pw. I do know that the ve table is still off some. The engine is way rich at cold startup(and still a bit rich once warmed). The engine idles rough when cold. I really need to get off my butt and get an ecm bench.....
thanks,
Tim
I asked because the pulse width was 4.5ish msec at idle when cold. the pulse width goes down to 2.5ish msec once warmed. So I'm trying to figure out if the ve tables are still far off and closed loop is lowering my p/w by 100% OR if the open loop coolant stuff needs leaned out. There is a few test I'll run tomorrow and then I'll know what table(s) is reducing pw. I do know that the ve table is still off some. The engine is way rich at cold startup(and still a bit rich once warmed). The engine idles rough when cold. I really need to get off my butt and get an ecm bench.....
thanks,
Tim
Tim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





