DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

TunerPro 160 baud def file troubles..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #1  
7Point4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Dyersburg, TN
Car: 1990 Chevy 454SS
Engine: 454
Transmission: TH400
TunerPro 160 baud def file troubles..

Having created a def file for my ecm, '8747, i am having a devil of a time getting it to work correctly.

I can read values now, and sometimes they are right.

With key on, and nothing moving, no sensors, etc.. The values bump around. With engine started, they move more than they should. And seemingly repeatable numbers, but not the right ones. Rpms from 750, to zero, to 3800, 750, etc...

They bounce with key on, but not started, but only to 2 values, 000 rpm, 1200 rpm, 000 rpm, etc.

After much frustration.. I do not know what to try next. using 20 word packet, thats what all the hacks and ALDLStuff.zip say it uses. 19 works better with key on and no motor running, but still bounces, just less. I got another 160 def file for a 8746, and it does the same thing. uses 20 word packet also.

Winaldl works with the same cable, and shows a flashing 20 at top, so thats 20 words? Is there some header/trailer info in the communictions spec that I am missing? Voltage levels different when running and not running and maybe tunerpro is cutting it a little close?

ANY ideas greatly appreciated. Hopefully its something simple, a checkbox or something, but I am almost at wits end right now.

Thanks alot!!!

(xposted here and on TunerPro forum. Hope thats okay. Thanks).
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
Mangus's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
I think its time for me to re-examine my 160 baud packet acquisition code. Enough people have been having issues. I can get it to work fine on my '165 $6E, other than an occasional glitch or two. Unfortunately I don't have access to any other test beds.

I'll be going through this code (and just about all other code) and will do my best to make it work better in the next release.

M
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #3  
jeepguy553's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Rockport, TX
Car: 1980 Jeep CJ7
Engine: AMC 360 with GM TBI
Transmission: TF727 set for kill...let's get it on!!!
Very cool!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 10:47 PM
  #4  
7Point4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Dyersburg, TN
Car: 1990 Chevy 454SS
Engine: 454
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by Mangus
I think its time for me to re-examine my 160 baud packet acquisition code. Enough people have been having issues. I can get it to work fine on my '165 $6E, other than an occasional glitch or two. Unfortunately I don't have access to any other test beds.

I'll be going through this code (and just about all other code) and will do my best to make it work better in the next release.

M

Thanks for the reply. Looking forward to the next release, and if there is anyway I can be of help, just email.

bmyers454@cableone.net
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
Apr 20, 2021 11:31 AM
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
May 24, 2018 01:02 PM
Rocket-Doc
TBI
1
Nov 14, 2015 02:08 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
12
Oct 2, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.