Disassembly Question
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Disassembly Question
When I disassembled my AUJP and reassembled it with no errors and compared it to the original it works perfectly.
The question that I have came up when I started to comment the file.
When comparing the addresses on my file to the ANHT hac, my addresses seem to 8 positions off from the ANHT.
Here is the control file I'm using (may or may not be 100% correct)
But it does reassemble correctly. Have not burned the image to try to run it yet.
I would like anyone to look at this and tell me if it matters.
Might just be a code difference between the two.
The sections I began commenting were the utilities near the end of the code, that's where I saw the references were shifted.
EDIT: Side note, I think there is a problem with it because if I use it on the S_aujp it will not assemble correctly.
End edit
; CONTROL FILE
; FOR AUJP 90-92 SPEED DENSITY TPI
; JP 9-10-04
;
;
INPUT AUJP.bin
OUTPUT AUJPP.dis
LOAD 8000
ADDRESSES ON
OPBYTES ON
DATAOPBYTES ON
ASCII OFF
ASCIIBYTES OFF
SPIT OFF
TABS OFF
TABWIDTH 1
LABEL fffa coprtn
LABEL fffc cmonrtn
indirect fff0 rtirtn
indirect fff2 irqrtn
indirect fff4 xirqrtn
indirect fff6 swirtn
indirect fff8 iloprtn
;indirect fffa coprtn ;CAUSED DUPLICATES
;indirect fffc cmonrtn ;CAUSED DUPLICATES
;ENTRY 8000 ; NOT NEEDED AND CAUSED PROBLEMS
ENTRY b000
ENTRY B204
ENTRY B6F8
ENTRY CE64
ENTRY CEC5
ENTRY D129
ENTRY D169
ENTRY D278
ENTRY D285
ENTRY D514
ENTRY D564
ENTRY D5CE
ENTRY D6C9
ENTRY D81A
ENTRY E1CE
ENTRY D885
ENTRY DA04
ENTRY E3F5
TIA,
Jp
The question that I have came up when I started to comment the file.
When comparing the addresses on my file to the ANHT hac, my addresses seem to 8 positions off from the ANHT.
Here is the control file I'm using (may or may not be 100% correct)
But it does reassemble correctly. Have not burned the image to try to run it yet.
I would like anyone to look at this and tell me if it matters.
Might just be a code difference between the two.
The sections I began commenting were the utilities near the end of the code, that's where I saw the references were shifted.
EDIT: Side note, I think there is a problem with it because if I use it on the S_aujp it will not assemble correctly.
End edit
; CONTROL FILE
; FOR AUJP 90-92 SPEED DENSITY TPI
; JP 9-10-04
;
;
INPUT AUJP.bin
OUTPUT AUJPP.dis
LOAD 8000
ADDRESSES ON
OPBYTES ON
DATAOPBYTES ON
ASCII OFF
ASCIIBYTES OFF
SPIT OFF
TABS OFF
TABWIDTH 1
LABEL fffa coprtn
LABEL fffc cmonrtn
indirect fff0 rtirtn
indirect fff2 irqrtn
indirect fff4 xirqrtn
indirect fff6 swirtn
indirect fff8 iloprtn
;indirect fffa coprtn ;CAUSED DUPLICATES
;indirect fffc cmonrtn ;CAUSED DUPLICATES
;ENTRY 8000 ; NOT NEEDED AND CAUSED PROBLEMS
ENTRY b000
ENTRY B204
ENTRY B6F8
ENTRY CE64
ENTRY CEC5
ENTRY D129
ENTRY D169
ENTRY D278
ENTRY D285
ENTRY D514
ENTRY D564
ENTRY D5CE
ENTRY D6C9
ENTRY D81A
ENTRY E1CE
ENTRY D885
ENTRY DA04
ENTRY E3F5
TIA,
Jp
Last edited by JP86SS; Sep 10, 2004 at 11:49 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
While the ANHT, and AUJP are 8D masks there are differences.
And there are even several different AUJPs.
Confusing?, yes, but just find of the thing GM would due to confuse us mortals.
And there are even several different AUJPs.
Confusing?, yes, but just find of the thing GM would due to confuse us mortals.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 3
From: Browns Town
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
I figured as much but didn't want to spend the next 6 months commenting and tracing the code to find out all my comments need to be shifted by 1 line
The upper portions seem to be the same but I'm not that far along.
Once I get the bin burned and run it, then I'll be sure I can keep working with it.
After I go through the $8D I'm going to concentrate on the $58 stuff to see how the boost is implemented.
I see a SC in my future
Now I just have to convince the wife it will save gas
With more power, I don't have to use as much!
The upper portions seem to be the same but I'm not that far along.
Once I get the bin burned and run it, then I'll be sure I can keep working with it.
After I go through the $8D I'm going to concentrate on the $58 stuff to see how the boost is implemented.
I see a SC in my future
Now I just have to convince the wife it will save gas
With more power, I don't have to use as much!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






