DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

A quick PE question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #1  
eric305TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Houston / The Woodlands, TX
Car: 82 ElCamino, looking for a 3rd gen
Engine: 305 TPI(427SB in progress) 730 $8D
Transmission: THM350 (Getting a 4L80E soon)
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt w/ 2.43 gears :(
A quick PE question

Is it possible to completely disable PE on a $8d calibration? If it is set to 100% it still enables while I am trying to adjust my VE up there.

Last edited by eric305TPI; Oct 27, 2004 at 09:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
How about just setting the PE AFR to 14.7, or 0% AFR correction?.

Just be REALLY careful about detonation when doing that. Lots of plug reading.

You can get to the point of tampering with the acoustic signature enough that the Knock Sensor is Deaf to the new noise.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 09:11 PM
  #3  
eric305TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Houston / The Woodlands, TX
Car: 82 ElCamino, looking for a 3rd gen
Engine: 305 TPI(427SB in progress) 730 $8D
Transmission: THM350 (Getting a 4L80E soon)
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt w/ 2.43 gears :(
I feel like a moron for not thinking of doing that.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
But won't entering PE, even with an AF of 14.7, still cause the Integrator to be set to 128 and BLM set to 128 or greater, and no O2 sensor feedback? (I don't want to say Open Loop or Closed Loop, or it will start a flame war - let's just call it PE Mode)
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #5  
eric305TPI's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Houston / The Woodlands, TX
Car: 82 ElCamino, looking for a 3rd gen
Engine: 305 TPI(427SB in progress) 730 $8D
Transmission: THM350 (Getting a 4L80E soon)
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt w/ 2.43 gears :(
That is correct, but it will still allow me to see if the VE is correct based on the WB reading.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 01:46 PM
  #6  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
when adjusting the VE at higher rpms i set TPS for AE to a higher value. my PE was set in bin to 70% so i did not need to mess with it(now it is 50%) . are you certain it is PE you are involking and not AE? cant see how PE could be involked if you have it set 100% TPS? now i never thought of AE/MAP coming on(till now)? when i looked at VE/higher rpms i did not have a WB02.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by RednGold86Z
But won't entering PE, even with an AF of 14.7, still cause the Integrator to be set to 128 and BLM set to 128 or greater, and no O2 sensor feedback? (I don't want to say Open Loop or Closed Loop, or it will start a flame war - let's just call it PE Mode)
And the problem with that is?.
There's so many mingled and tangled items in the code, IMO, it's best to invoke things as they are normally executed.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 12:16 AM
  #8  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
I was just assuming he wanted to have closed loop to tune - didn't know he had a wideband running.

If you have a wideband that you can trust, and know the commanded AF, it's not totally stupid to tune VE to achieve that AF in PE, if it's dangerous to run (for extended times) at those loads at stoich (but up to a point - don't expect much accuracy below 12.5). I'd recommend setting the PE AF to a constant at all RPMs first, though, to make things easier. Also, I'd recommend driving a bunch in normal closed loop mode and logging to see if closed loop is adding or subtracting (at those loads) before PE is entered to verify and make finer adjustments. It may not be 100% precise, but there's a good 5% of room to not really have to worry about if you tune to 12.5-12.8:1. Also, when in PE, you're usually in RPMs that are way above daily driving, so it's not likely to see too much Block Learn going on up there.

If you do set PE to 14.7, I'd have to recommend disabling PE spark adder while tuning there (and I'm sure Grumpy will say remove it all-together).
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 06:11 AM
  #9  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
I guess, I gotta splain this since no one's gonna run with it.

Set the PE low, that disables the closed loop mode.
Then set the VE table(s) to refect what AFR you want to run (in the higher load redions).
Then you don't have to worry about the high load PE AFRs being stoich., you just then tune for what makes the engine happy.

And yes, you just leave the PE enables at the lower specs..
For the lil v6, I think I have em set at ~20-25% TPS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM
jahblah
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 12, 2015 05:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.