DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

While we're at it...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 07:17 PM
  #1  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
While we're at it...

'84-'85 GN Maf = Cardone #74-7699
'86-'87 GN Maf = Cardone #74-7899

Any ideas on the differences?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 07:58 PM
  #2  
funstick's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
From: great lakes
Re: While we're at it...

Originally posted by Doward
'84-'85 GN Maf = Cardone #74-7699
'86-'87 GN Maf = Cardone #74-7899

Any ideas on the differences?
yes 84-85 is a hot wire Bosch tpi design i do belive and the 86-87 peice is a film style AC delco peice. it could be the other way around.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
My sources are quoted as having said -

'The hot-film MAFs, which AC Rochester
introduced in 1984 on the Buick turbo 3.8L
V6 and were also used on Chevrolet 2.8L
engines and GM 3.0L and 3.8L V6 engines,
produce a square-wave variable frequency
output. The frequency range varies from 32
to 150 Hz, with 32 Hz being average for idle
and 150 Hz for wide-open throttle'

This from a Wells Counterpoint issue.

Perhaps the '84-'85 are the hot film frequency based MAFs, similar to the 2.8's?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 07:40 AM
  #4  
3.8TransAM's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
I believe you are correct in the frequency output of the earlier ones. Cant verify the use of them on toher cars however.

I dont know alot about the earlier ones, but the later 86-89 MAF was pretty much junk if u got a good one , u did, the rest would just crap out in a week it seems. Something like a MAF translator(if u can make it work) may work really nice for you if u can use it. Let u run a late model MAF and they are alot cheaper and way more reliable.

later
Jeremy
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
Doward's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Hmm... I think I'll pick up like an '84 GN Maf, see about using it in place of the stock 2.8 one
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okfoz
History / Originality
27
Oct 13, 2015 02:19 PM
85cmroz28
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 4, 2015 09:44 PM
luvofjah
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
13
Sep 26, 2015 08:28 PM
CORV3TT3
DIY PROM
6
Aug 23, 2015 11:26 AM
CD MaroMan 91
Auto Detailing and Appearance
2
Nov 28, 2001 04:45 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.