DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

MAF gram/sec @ idle and scalar question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
BlackWidow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Cartahge, MO
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
MAF gram/sec @ idle and scalar question

After an hour of searching I will give up and ask. I have a 383 running 6e and the MAF is reading 13-14 grams per second at idle. Stock calibration calls for 4-8 grams per second at idle. Is mine reading more because of the bigger engine or do I have a problem here and they should be reading 4-8?

I got a little off track when searching and saw a post regarding MAF scalars. Everything I read said the last cell in table one should match the first in table two. I am using Tuner Pro 4.0 and in Table 1 last entry is 22.36 and in Table 2 first entry is 21.38. Should I change them to match?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 07:49 AM
  #2  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
4 is very low, 8 is more typical, but I dont see anything too terribly wrong with around 13 g/s, especially if the motor is set up to have a fast idle. How does the exhaust smell?
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
88305tpiT/A's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 2
From: Ft Worth, TX USA
Car: 2016 Ram 1500
Engine: 3.0L Diesel
Transmission: 8sp
and yes, change them to match.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
BlackWidow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Cartahge, MO
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
dimented24x7 - The exhaust smells rich at idle. I am commanding idle at 750 rpm so maybe that is the reason for the added air flow. I will set the table back to stock and see if the grams/sec comes down. It makes since. Thanks

88305tpiT/A - I will change them, I apprecaite it. Have any idea why they did not match in the first place? Confusing...
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #5  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
What file are you using for editing (ecu/xdf)? Where did you get it and when.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #6  
BlackWidow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Cartahge, MO
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
I am using xdf off of TunerPro's website. I downloaded it around 3 to 4 weeks ago when I went to 4.0. I originally read the stock chip with TunerPro 3.10 and the ecu file off the website as well. Why, are there some know problems that have been fixed?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Logan Bryant
TPI
10
Aug 27, 2015 11:52 AM
Bert87
Electronics
3
Aug 23, 2015 03:50 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
perZ
TPI
7
Aug 15, 2015 01:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.