knocking make sense?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
knocking make sense?
L98, MAF
zz4 cam
6* initial timing
TPS 1.55, MAF 67.83 g/s
arap advance curve
I did some datalogging and found 5 degrees retard on an acceleration burst at 2000 rpm while both integrator and blms showed 128 and load was 161.
According to the table, spark was exactly where it should have been at just over 32 degrees.
Why the knock and subsequent retard?
Is the solution to modify the advance table or to add fuel?
If I were to add fuel, wouldn't it then be rich?
Comments?
Oh! Why doesn't the tps match the maf table value at that point? (Should be 26 g/s in Table 2)
zz4 cam
6* initial timing
TPS 1.55, MAF 67.83 g/s
arap advance curve
I did some datalogging and found 5 degrees retard on an acceleration burst at 2000 rpm while both integrator and blms showed 128 and load was 161.
According to the table, spark was exactly where it should have been at just over 32 degrees.
Why the knock and subsequent retard?
Is the solution to modify the advance table or to add fuel?
If I were to add fuel, wouldn't it then be rich?
Comments?
Oh! Why doesn't the tps match the maf table value at that point? (Should be 26 g/s in Table 2)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Charles County, Maryland
Car: 2000 BMW M5
Oh! Why doesn't the tps match the maf table value at that point? (Should be 26 g/s in Table 2)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: knocking make sense?
Originally posted by 2new2funny
I did some datalogging and found 5 degrees retard on an acceleration burst at 2000 rpm while both integrator and blms showed 128 and load was 161.
I did some datalogging and found 5 degrees retard on an acceleration burst at 2000 rpm while both integrator and blms showed 128 and load was 161.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post