0-60 times w/ WINALDL accuracy?
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Car: 91' Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 388 ci Small block CHEVY (4.060x3.75), Dart Iron Eagle Platinum 200cc, Performer intake, 454 TBI, Long Tubes, True Dual 3" GPs
Transmission: 700R4, B&M, Governer Recal, 20,000 GVW cooler
0-60 times w/ WINALDL accuracy?
Has anybody ever compared the accuracy of using WINALDL to check your 0-60 times.
Of two logs I made at WOT, I got 5.8 seconds and 6.4 seconds, so average about 6.1 seconds, if winaldl is accurate.
Of two logs I made at WOT, I got 5.8 seconds and 6.4 seconds, so average about 6.1 seconds, if winaldl is accurate.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: In your ear. No, the other one.
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Given a 160 baud packet rate is on the order of < 1 packet per second, I'd guess it is highly inaccurate (at +/- 1 second).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
