MAF Table tuning question
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,257
Likes: 5
Car: Turbo Buick
Engine: 3.8 V6
MAF Table tuning question
Ive been tuning the tables on my car with the 148 ecm, 3.5" maf and translator
I have the car running way better than what i started with, I am using a scanmaster and wideband to figure out which air flow I am at and a/f ratio
I am noticing something strange though
Under load with a given Gm/s reading, I have one afr
and then if i am at say a lower LV8 but the same air flow, i have another AFR.
It seems like its anywhere from .5 to 1.0 afr point leaner under load, am I on crack or what? Or does this have a perfectly logical explanation?
another thing I was wondering is if the gm/s displayed is the number I put in the chip or is the GM/s display extrapolated from counts somehow and remains constant relative to the counts?
I ask because, lets say I put numbers that calculate to 5.6, 5.9, and 6.4 in three consecutive cells in the maf table, will I just be displayed 6 for all three cells?
Im guessing yes... and that makes tuning difficult without direct scan which I am getting soon anyway I hope
Thanks for any help
I have the car running way better than what i started with, I am using a scanmaster and wideband to figure out which air flow I am at and a/f ratio
I am noticing something strange though
Under load with a given Gm/s reading, I have one afr
and then if i am at say a lower LV8 but the same air flow, i have another AFR.
It seems like its anywhere from .5 to 1.0 afr point leaner under load, am I on crack or what? Or does this have a perfectly logical explanation?
another thing I was wondering is if the gm/s displayed is the number I put in the chip or is the GM/s display extrapolated from counts somehow and remains constant relative to the counts?
I ask because, lets say I put numbers that calculate to 5.6, 5.9, and 6.4 in three consecutive cells in the maf table, will I just be displayed 6 for all three cells?
Im guessing yes... and that makes tuning difficult without direct scan which I am getting soon anyway I hope
Thanks for any help
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: MAF Table tuning question
Originally posted by Pablo
Under load with a given Gm/s reading, I have one afr and then if i am at say a lower LV8 but the same air flow, i have another AFR.
It seems like its anywhere from .5 to 1.0 afr point leaner under load, am I on crack or what? Or does this have a perfectly logical explanation?
another thing I was wondering is if the gm/s displayed is the number I put in the chip or is the GM/s display extrapolated from counts somehow and remains constant relative to the counts?
I ask because, lets say I put numbers that calculate to 5.6, 5.9, and 6.4 in three consecutive cells in the maf table, will I just be displayed 6 for all three cells?
Under load with a given Gm/s reading, I have one afr and then if i am at say a lower LV8 but the same air flow, i have another AFR.
It seems like its anywhere from .5 to 1.0 afr point leaner under load, am I on crack or what? Or does this have a perfectly logical explanation?
another thing I was wondering is if the gm/s displayed is the number I put in the chip or is the GM/s display extrapolated from counts somehow and remains constant relative to the counts?
I ask because, lets say I put numbers that calculate to 5.6, 5.9, and 6.4 in three consecutive cells in the maf table, will I just be displayed 6 for all three cells?
The ecm rounds off it's calculations.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
Could be a problem with the "Injector turn-on time" or in other words the "offset vs Vbatt" giving problems. If the PW and frequency of injections are different (i.e. different load and RPM but same Airflow as you say), then this is what is needed to bring the two points to the same A/F.
I'm not certain how "Scanmaster" works, but I would suspect that the data you are seeing is AFTER the raw MAF input is translated by your scale tables. The only way to be sure is to monitor the raw MAF data/voltage. You could experiment by "wasting" a PROM and setting the MAF scales to something ridiculous, and seeing if the scanned data reacts accordingly or reports something more realistic. I'd suspect the former.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










