Enrich Power Change to AFR Vs. RPM
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Enrich Power Change to AFR Vs. RPM
Should my Enrich Power Change to AFR Vs. RPM have (-)%AFR at 2000RPM and 2800RPM?
My 2D graph looked like this
/\ /\
/ \/ \
My 2D graph looked like this
/\ /\
/ \/ \
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally Posted by 91GTABird
Should my Enrich Power Change to AFR Vs. RPM have (-)%AFR at 2000RPM and 2800RPM?
My 2D graph looked like this
My 2D graph looked like this
FWIW, a 3rd Gen MAF sensor reads airflow in either direction, so if there is any reversion, it reads excessively high. Which to compensate for, means removing fuel in that area.
And that might be enough to fubar the LV8 calculations, and thus the timing.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, Tn
Car: 92' RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Grump, heres a shot of it. I just thought that it was odd for the AFR to numerically increase at certain intervals , mainly in my LTR powerband.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally Posted by 91GTABird
Grump, heres a shot of it. I just thought that it was odd for the AFR to numerically increase at certain intervals , mainly in my LTR powerband.
The tuned lengths of the runners, plenum volumes, reversion, all add up for the tune to be *dynamic*.
It's just a matter of making the engine happy.... <G>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





