Ok, locked my BLM to 128, now what....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 786
Likes: 2
From: Guilford, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 w/TransGo
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73s
Ok, locked my BLM to 128, now what....
do I look for next to make changes? I did a scan/record on my way to work today, got about 16minutes of data. I checked the results, and the BLM was definitely stuck on 128. The INT acted a little differently than before the lock. It used to change rapidly, and the BLM changed slowly. Now the INT changes a little slower. What do I look for to make adjustments? There was about 100 frames of data in a row where the INT was around 112-118, and the airflow was about 30-32, relatively steady. Do I adjust the MAF tables like I did before with the BLM?
IE new MAF=(INT/128)*old MAF
I worked on the tables a bit with the just tweaking the MAF tables via the BLMs, above or below 128 at specific airflows. Now I just locked the BLM to 128. There was only one section in this scan where I could pinpoint making a change based on the INT numbers. Other areas things were changing simultaneously.
Also, how much should I be changing the MAF numbers, since it is a finer adjustment?
Thanks for any tips.
------------------
Best ET 14.413 @95.57 without
pulling valve covers or manifolds.
Also with stock 2.77 rear end!!!
IE new MAF=(INT/128)*old MAF
I worked on the tables a bit with the just tweaking the MAF tables via the BLMs, above or below 128 at specific airflows. Now I just locked the BLM to 128. There was only one section in this scan where I could pinpoint making a change based on the INT numbers. Other areas things were changing simultaneously.
Also, how much should I be changing the MAF numbers, since it is a finer adjustment?
Thanks for any tips.
------------------
Best ET 14.413 @95.57 without
pulling valve covers or manifolds.
Also with stock 2.77 rear end!!!
I never really got into tuning my MAF setup a whole lot, i think i had some things that were flaking out on me(relays, MAF itself, some other stuff). So i switched to SD soon afterwards. The best thing i can suggest is, Use the same road and weather conditions as possible when getting info. Then just start experimenting by adding and lowering values GRADUALLY. Then get more data and compare.
------------------
1987 IROC-Z L98,SuperRam,EB 6085's,LPE 219/219 Roller, Crane 1.6RR, EB TPI Base, 58mm TB, ADS 24#, AFPR, K&N, EB TES, Catco Cat, 3" Borla Cat-Back, Accel cap,rotor,distro/other crap, MSD 6AL, MSD Blaster 3, Aluminum DS, 94 Disk Rear, Adjustable Valve, Precision 3.73 Gears, Sub-Frame Connectors, Hotchkis Lower Control Arms, KYB Shocks/Struts, Suspension Techniques Lowering Springs, Polyurethan Bushings all over the place, Moog Upper/Lower Ball joints and Tie Rods ends/Idler Arm,
To see the ROC, Check out the webpage Here
------------------
1987 IROC-Z L98,SuperRam,EB 6085's,LPE 219/219 Roller, Crane 1.6RR, EB TPI Base, 58mm TB, ADS 24#, AFPR, K&N, EB TES, Catco Cat, 3" Borla Cat-Back, Accel cap,rotor,distro/other crap, MSD 6AL, MSD Blaster 3, Aluminum DS, 94 Disk Rear, Adjustable Valve, Precision 3.73 Gears, Sub-Frame Connectors, Hotchkis Lower Control Arms, KYB Shocks/Struts, Suspension Techniques Lowering Springs, Polyurethan Bushings all over the place, Moog Upper/Lower Ball joints and Tie Rods ends/Idler Arm,
To see the ROC, Check out the webpage Here
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 786
Likes: 2
From: Guilford, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 w/TransGo
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt w/3.73s
Anyone else got some ideas? I will most likely make another scan on my car, before I make more changes.
I just would like to know the proper procedure to tune with the BLM locked to 128.
I just would like to know the proper procedure to tune with the BLM locked to 128.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM
Dragonsys
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 25, 2015 03:51 PM





