Decreasing startup time?
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Car: Which one?
Engine: 355
Transmission: 465
Decreasing startup time?
I tried to search and either search is broken, or I can't, as no search word returns results.
I suspect this has been covered, so is there a consensus on whether or not changing the number of distributor reference pulses required to fire to decrease startup time is good or bad?
It's not a faulty fuel pump relay I'm dealing with, starts aren't unreasonable, just longer than they have to be based on the settings in the bin.
I suspect this was done by GM to get some oil flowing before the load from running hits the bearings, but I played around with it, and the engine will certainly start much faster if you let it.
Specs in sig, if it matters.
I suspect this has been covered, so is there a consensus on whether or not changing the number of distributor reference pulses required to fire to decrease startup time is good or bad?
It's not a faulty fuel pump relay I'm dealing with, starts aren't unreasonable, just longer than they have to be based on the settings in the bin.
I suspect this was done by GM to get some oil flowing before the load from running hits the bearings, but I played around with it, and the engine will certainly start much faster if you let it.
Specs in sig, if it matters.
Member

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Crestline,OH
Car: 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 6.0 boost and smak
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27
Re: Decreasing startup time?
If i remember right, you may be useing a version of ARAP... my first 8-9 cells in the "Crank Fuel PW Multipliler Vs. Ref. Pulse" table were zero, put a little in them and see what happens....
mulitply anything by zero and what do you get?
ref. pulse- is something like crank revs
mulitply anything by zero and what do you get?
ref. pulse- is something like crank revs
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Car: Which one?
Engine: 355
Transmission: 465
Re: Decreasing startup time?
Yeah, that's what I had changed to see how fast it would start. It certainly makes a huge difference, my question is why did GM not just set the system to start faster in the first place?
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
Re: Decreasing startup time?
They want to avoid electrical noise from causing injections at a bad time.
They want to get the starter moving the engine a little faster before injecting to reduce flooding chance.
It's only 2 revolutions of delayed start.
A little extra oil pressure is good too.
And just see if it starts on the fumes in the manifold.
It helps ensure the operator really desired a start, rather than a bump, to avoid flooding or starting.
All possible, some more probable.
They want to get the starter moving the engine a little faster before injecting to reduce flooding chance.
It's only 2 revolutions of delayed start.
A little extra oil pressure is good too.
And just see if it starts on the fumes in the manifold.
It helps ensure the operator really desired a start, rather than a bump, to avoid flooding or starting.
All possible, some more probable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




