DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 09:54 AM
  #1  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Starting to think I should back injectors off..

I dunno. I'm starting to think I should get smaller injectors and run higher rail pressure so my idle pulse widths are a bit larger (pulling 1.5's now)..

Here is my combo:

Engine: 357 cid 4-bolt main 1pc rear
Camshaft: Comp Cams CC-306 (230/244, .510/.540, 112lsa 110ctr)
Pistons: SRP-139629 reverse dome, -16cc dish
Rods: SCAT H-BEAM 5.850"
Heads: TrickFlow TFS 23* alum, angle milled to 55cc
Manifold: TPIS Miniram, 58MM BBK Throttle body
Exhaust: Hooker 2149 long tube headers, carsound cat, dual exhaust
Intake: Stock ram air, K&N air filter
Fuel: Walbro 255lph pump
ECM: 1227730 ECM, $8D MAP code
Transmission: 700R4 w/ transgo shift kit, 2800 stall raptor 5x converter
Compression: 10.14:1

I'm running 36# LS1 injectors (the white ones). Starting to think 30's might be better for my combo.

What do you guys think?

-- Joe
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #2  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Sounds reasonable to me, it's looking like my SVO 30's are going to be plenty for me since I donm't run any power adders.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #3  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by vernw
Sounds reasonable to me, it's looking like my SVO 30's are going to be plenty for me since I donm't run any power adders.
Good thing is, I could probably do an even trade with someone whos running boost or NOS. heh

That and MR fuel injectors take 30 seconds to change.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #4  
vernw's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX area
Car: 91 Formula WS6 (Black, T-Tops)
Engine: 383 MiniRam (529 HP, 519 TQ - DD2K)
Transmission: Built '97 T56, Pro 5.0, CF-DF
Axle/Gears: 4.11 posi Ford 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

I know, that's a real sweet feature on the MR's!!!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
CriSSes's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

I have a very similar setup and was running 24# injectors. They were in the low 9ms range at about 5200 rpm, so I just recently installed some 30# SVO injectors. As you say - the MR makes it easy except that I ended up damaging two o-rings where they fit into the fuel rail despite being very careful. Damaged o-rings can leak quite a bit of fuel at 43 psi, so that would be my caution here. Unfortunatley, I don't know yet what base pulse width I have at high rpm. I can report this in the next day or so. I think the 30# will be the correct size. I do like how you can change the injector constant and easily be back in business and the car runs the same as it did before.

Last edited by CriSSes; Mar 30, 2007 at 10:58 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
HaulnA$$'s Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 458
Likes: 2
From: Dallas
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by anesthes
I dunno. I'm starting to think I should get smaller injectors and run higher rail pressure so my idle pulse widths are a bit larger (pulling 1.5's now)..

Here is my combo:

Engine: 357 cid 4-bolt main 1pc rear
Camshaft: Comp Cams CC-306 (230/244, .510/.540, 112lsa 110ctr)
Pistons: SRP-139629 reverse dome, -16cc dish
Rods: SCAT H-BEAM 5.850"
Heads: TrickFlow TFS 23* alum, angle milled to 55cc
Manifold: TPIS Miniram, 58MM BBK Throttle body
Exhaust: Hooker 2149 long tube headers, carsound cat, dual exhaust
Intake: Stock ram air, K&N air filter
Fuel: Walbro 255lph pump
ECM: 1227730 ECM, $8D MAP code
Transmission: 700R4 w/ transgo shift kit, 2800 stall raptor 5x converter
Compression: 10.14:1

I'm running 36# LS1 injectors (the white ones). Starting to think 30's might be better for my combo.

What do you guys think?

-- Joe
Have you played with the injector biases, more specifically the min sync pulse width? This setting is critical for a good idle with larger injectors. A while back, I tested several different size injectors, 19,22,24, and 30 lb. As injector size increased, so did the minimum pulse width to open the injector. The 19 lb. injectors were right at 1mS, the 22's were just under 1.1mS and the 30's were at 1.3mS. That is a 30% swing. I did not have a 36 to test although you can test it yourself easily if you have access to an oscilloscope. It doesn't take a fancy setup. Al you need is a simple 555 timer circuit with a driver transistor and potientometer for varying the pulsewidth, a 12V batttery, a regulated air compressor and some hose. Connect the circuit to the injector and connect the compressor to the input side of the injector with a small piece of hose and some hose clamps. You can fill the hose with some fluid if you want to get fanvy. Set the pressure to something reasonable like 40 psi and turn on the circuit starting at a low PW. Slowly increase the PW until the injector starts flowing air (or fluid) and then measure the PW with the scope. This time will be very close, close enough to use as the min sync PW. Just a thought. HTH
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #7  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by HaulnA$$
Have you played with the injector biases, more specifically the min sync pulse width? This setting is critical for a good idle with larger injectors. A while back, I tested several different size injectors, 19,22,24, and 30 lb. As injector size increased, so did the minimum pulse width to open the injector. The 19 lb. injectors were right at 1mS, the 22's were just under 1.1mS and the 30's were at 1.3mS. That is a 30% swing. I did not have a 36 to test although you can test it yourself easily if you have access to an oscilloscope. It doesn't take a fancy setup. Al you need is a simple 555 timer circuit with a driver transistor and potientometer for varying the pulsewidth, a 12V batttery, a regulated air compressor and some hose. Connect the circuit to the injector and connect the compressor to the input side of the injector with a small piece of hose and some hose clamps. You can fill the hose with some fluid if you want to get fanvy. Set the pressure to something reasonable like 40 psi and turn on the circuit starting at a low PW. Slowly increase the PW until the injector starts flowing air (or fluid) and then measure the PW with the scope. This time will be very close, close enough to use as the min sync PW. Just a thought. HTH

I've played with them. The problem is actual minimum pw.. 1.5msec is not a reliable pulsewidth IMO. I've had best luck idling with setups in the 2.0msec range.. Maybe i'm being paranoid..

I'd like to get my hands on somebody elses map setup with big cam. My TPS reaction is just plain bad. I don't know if its map resolution causing the problem, or what. Theres almost a second delay in throttle stab.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
HaulnA$$'s Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 458
Likes: 2
From: Dallas
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by anesthes
.....I'd like to get my hands on somebody elses map setup with big cam. My TPS reaction is just plain bad. I don't know if its map resolution causing the problem, or what. Theres almost a second delay in throttle stab.

-- Joe
Sounds like an AE vs MAP (or LV8. Don't know what ECM you're running) issue to me. All the more reason to have plenty of injector.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #9  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by HaulnA$$
Sounds like an AE vs MAP (or LV8. Don't know what ECM you're running) issue to me. All the more reason to have plenty of injector.

$8D..

I dunno. it's weirdness. i'll figure it out when I'm done. I keep taking it apart.

Guess i'll tinker with the 36's for another month or two and make a decision.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #10  
CriSSes's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by HaulnA$$
Have you played with the injector biases, more specifically the min sync pulse width? This setting is critical for a good idle with larger injectors. A while back, I tested several different size injectors, 19,22,24, and 30 lb. As injector size increased, so did the minimum pulse width to open the injector. The 19 lb. injectors were right at 1mS, the 22's were just under 1.1mS and the 30's were at 1.3mS. That is a 30% swing. I did not have a 36 to test although you can test it yourself easily if you have access to an oscilloscope. It doesn't take a fancy setup. Al you need is a simple 555 timer circuit with a driver transistor and potientometer for varying the pulsewidth, a 12V batttery, a regulated air compressor and some hose. Connect the circuit to the injector and connect the compressor to the input side of the injector with a small piece of hose and some hose clamps. You can fill the hose with some fluid if you want to get fanvy. Set the pressure to something reasonable like 40 psi and turn on the circuit starting at a low PW. Slowly increase the PW until the injector starts flowing air (or fluid) and then measure the PW with the scope. This time will be very close, close enough to use as the min sync PW. Just a thought. HTH
Alright, I'm curious about the injector bias thing. In TunerPro 165/6E there is a constant called Minimum Enrich Async Pulse Width and its set to 1.69 ms. I currently idle with about a 2.2 ms pulse width. What happens if I change the constant in TunerPro from 1.69 ms up or down?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #11  
Z69's Avatar
Z69
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

I don't think Minimum Enrich Async Pulse Width is an injector bias in 6E.

For 8d it would be the low PW off set table at $840B.
There's also a single fire PW setting & the batt volts offset table.
If you do some digging, you might find Traxion's AE comments from his MR setup. All I remember of it was that he used 200% of aujp but not which tables he did it to. I used 1.7 applied to AXCN tables for the current MR bin on a 6sd 383 30lb setup I'm helping on. It has a slightly bigger cam than yours. But the 1600-2400 VE came out at 96/125 on the second chip so the extra richness may have covered up any AE defecits. I've also heard from guys with smaller cams that the LT1 tables work well.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #12  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Also, for AE, make sure your MAP sensor is on its own port to the the manifold. Don't share it with anything, not even the FPR. Also make sure the tube to it is as short as possible, and make sure the tube is not too soft. That can cause a lot of lag and turn a small AE problem into a big AE problem.

When you get to big cam and big injectors, it's time to consider some kind of sequential conversion, if you want to get better idle. Not mandatory, but life is easier with it.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 06:17 AM
  #13  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Re: Starting to think I should back injectors off..

Originally Posted by RednGold86Z
When you get to big cam and big injectors, it's time to consider some kind of sequential conversion, if you want to get better idle. Not mandatory, but life is easier with it.
In another thread, I was mentioning how much i'd love to run a 93-95 LT1 ecm. If I could get it to work with a hei dizzy i'd repin in the quickness. Then i'd get sequential, EFI with cyl trim, etc.

-- Joe
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
specialized
TPI
27
Jun 18, 2022 09:26 AM
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
Jae992
TBI
3
Aug 27, 2015 09:07 AM
justin57
TBI
30
Aug 20, 2015 07:05 PM
bbsr72
Brakes
0
Aug 12, 2015 10:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.