Im using TunerPro and the 6E.xdf. The bin is APYM.
If you check out the 2 pictures I hopefully attached, the second to the top voltage in the table, is higher than the top! I noticed while graphing in excel, which im also attaching a pic because it looks like the voltage (x-axis) is definitly what is the fault. it should be 2.1 instead of 2.2 in order to make a linear section there.
This does not occur anywhere else in the MAF tables.
and, well...
I duno how to fix it! haha, is there a way? Is it the .xdf's fault? the .bin's fault?
Thanks for any help
If you check out the 2 pictures I hopefully attached, the second to the top voltage in the table, is higher than the top! I noticed while graphing in excel, which im also attaching a pic because it looks like the voltage (x-axis) is definitly what is the fault. it should be 2.1 instead of 2.2 in order to make a linear section there.
This does not occur anywhere else in the MAF tables.
and, well...
I duno how to fix it! haha, is there a way? Is it the .xdf's fault? the .bin's fault?
Thanks for any help
Well, I jumped the gun, this thread can be deleted if the mods want.
i figured out how to edit the .xdf, and realized the voltage numbers are just typed right into the first column of that table within the xdf, so i assume that they are nothing more than labels for me to look at.
now i suppose ill have to wonder where those numbers originated, for somebody to input into the xdf in the first place..
ah well, always a learning experience i guess
i figured out how to edit the .xdf, and realized the voltage numbers are just typed right into the first column of that table within the xdf, so i assume that they are nothing more than labels for me to look at.
now i suppose ill have to wonder where those numbers originated, for somebody to input into the xdf in the first place..
ah well, always a learning experience i guess
