DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Closed loop to open loop here I come

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #1  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Closed loop to open loop here I come

Well, I've had a studder with my cam in the new 383 I built....its a pretty hot combo and I couldn't get the studder gone and once I did, it would do it at another rpm. So, I decide to try open loop....got the idle A/F ratio close and just carefully watching the A/F ratio...made two VE adjustments and went for a drive.....the studder is gone.....wooohoooo. If feels so good to not have that anymore....so much more enjoyable to drive. So, any open loop tips are welcome. Right now, just trying to get the VE correct and basically take out some tip in as well. Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

You can probably go back to open loop once the VE tables are tuned in open loop. I usually do the following:
Tune the VE and spark using closed loop and BLMs
Once it is close, go to open loop and tune fuel & spark with a WBO2
Then go back to closed loop and tune the O2 constants and PID correction tables to match the open loop engine characteristics.

I like closed loop because it will adjust for different types of fuel and the car will run more consistent. Open loop is OK but you can get it to run better with closed loop enabled.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

The thing is...I could never get it....it would go from 13:1 to 18:1 for no reason just sitting at idle. In open loop, its a nice steady 14.5....and everything is out. I know I'll need two different tunes and that's fine. I already have the LM-1 and I'll get the guage so I can always keep track of it. If everything is better then that's fine with me. I'm going to try closed loop again in the end but I doubt it'll be better.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 10:52 PM
  #4  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

I have experienced the same thing.........O2 drifting lean at idle. I would only run open loop before because of that and not getting the AFR above 60KPA and under 30 KPA right. What I found that worked best was to tune the VE tables to the AFR I wanted using open loop. Then switch back to closed loop and tune the O2 and PID values to what I had in open loop. It isn't easy and takes a fair amount of time.

Take a look at the O2 value using the ALDL at idle. I bet the O2 sensor is cooling off and going static (not switching). It will usually drift to reporting lean before it goes static so the BLMs are thrown off.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #5  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

Originally Posted by junkcltr
I have experienced the same thing.........O2 drifting lean at idle. I would only run open loop before because of that and not getting the AFR above 60KPA and under 30 KPA right. What I found that worked best was to tune the VE tables to the AFR I wanted using open loop. Then switch back to closed loop and tune the O2 and PID values to what I had in open loop. It isn't easy and takes a fair amount of time.

Take a look at the O2 value using the ALDL at idle. I bet the O2 sensor is cooling off and going static (not switching). It will usually drift to reporting lean before it goes static so the BLMs are thrown off.
I'll take a look at it...the wideband was reporting those figures I posted up.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

The NBO2 can only be fudged in a limited amount. Please don't expect to tune it way off stoich. +/-.5 AFR is doable, but much more will give inconsistent results. A NBO2 that cools off will never give any consistent results.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #7  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

Originally Posted by junkcltr
The NBO2 can only be fudged in a limited amount. Please don't expect to tune it way off stoich. +/-.5 AFR is doable, but much more will give inconsistent results. A NBO2 that cools off will never give any consistent results.
I've gotten everything within 13.5 to 14.5 all the time now at part throttle and cruise. Idle is about 14.2. It runs so much better in open loop. I'm going to try and use closed loop this afternoon after two more tunes I'll try closed loop again...but I expect the same thing to happen....the studder will come back.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007 | 06:48 PM
  #8  
cgtms's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Manassas VA
Car: 1989 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.24
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

I have been running open loop for over a year now with no issues. The car runs strong and with a wide band I am running 14.5 to 15.0 light loads. If you have a wideband and happy with the tune I really see no reason to go back to closed loop.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 11:28 AM
  #9  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

Originally Posted by cgtms
I have been running open loop for over a year now with no issues. The car runs strong and with a wide band I am running 14.5 to 15.0 light loads. If you have a wideband and happy with the tune I really see no reason to go back to closed loop.
The more I get it fine tuned, the more I realize how different it can get...if the IAC is stuck open, MAT sensor is hot, etc.

But tuning is coming along...I'm realizing that you really need to tune the engine and a wideband is really a must. It really takes a lot of fine tuning once you get it to around 13.5:1 to 14:1.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #10  
cgtms's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Manassas VA
Car: 1989 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 3.24
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

So very true....
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
91chevz71's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

what about adjusting the proportional gains/ O2 sensor stuff in the bin?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #12  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

Originally Posted by junkcltr
I have experienced the same thing.........O2 drifting lean at idle. I would only run open loop before because of that and not getting the AFR above 60KPA and under 30 KPA right. What I found that worked best was to tune the VE tables to the AFR I wanted using open loop. Then switch back to closed loop and tune the O2 and PID values to what I had in open loop. It isn't easy and takes a fair amount of time.

Take a look at the O2 value using the ALDL at idle. I bet the O2 sensor is cooling off and going static (not switching). It will usually drift to reporting lean before it goes static so the BLMs are thrown off.
I have a heated o2 as well so its not cooling off.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #13  
junkcltr's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 1
From: garage
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

It sounds like you are getting the VE and spark close. That makes a huge difference in an engine working properly in closed loop. Give CL a try when you have open loop tuned. If you don't like it then go back to open loop. It sounds like CL will work for you in the end.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #14  
YenkoST's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Closed loop to open loop here I come

Originally Posted by junkcltr
It sounds like you are getting the VE and spark close. That makes a huge difference in an engine working properly in closed loop. Give CL a try when you have open loop tuned. If you don't like it then go back to open loop. It sounds like CL will work for you in the end.
Yep...checked the plugs...looked like a little detonation was on it so I decreased timing a degree and runs smoother at part throttle now. I also fine tuned the VE a little more, its between 13.8 and 14.3 now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM
luvofjah
Electronics
7
Sep 3, 2015 07:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.