Proportional Gain vs 02 mV error?
Proportional Gain vs 02 mV error?
I am using EBL.bin for this table.
Why does the table values only run 417 mV to o mV? appears the higher mV are not being looked at.
EBL.bin runs 417mV value of 55 gain and 0 mV being value of 16.
I have fuel pressure of 19 lbs with 80 lbs injectors. Should I reduce this table? If so how much to start?
Also, PRP duration vs 02 Error. Mine are slighly increased vs EBL.bin. Not sure how that happened? Is that increase incorrect?
Also, PRP-Duration offset vs airflow. my values are less. Is that correct?
Thanks.
Why does the table values only run 417 mV to o mV? appears the higher mV are not being looked at.
EBL.bin runs 417mV value of 55 gain and 0 mV being value of 16.
I have fuel pressure of 19 lbs with 80 lbs injectors. Should I reduce this table? If so how much to start?
Also, PRP duration vs 02 Error. Mine are slighly increased vs EBL.bin. Not sure how that happened? Is that increase incorrect?
Also, PRP-Duration offset vs airflow. my values are less. Is that correct?
Thanks.
Last edited by Ronny; Jul 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Proportional Gain vs 02 mV error?
The 417 mV of error covers the usable range of the O2 sensor. It is both a plus & minus 417 mV from the desired O2 window. So the full range is 834 mV.
If you are not having any issues with closed loop prop gains causing surging, then no need to fix what isn't broken.
RBob.
If you are not having any issues with closed loop prop gains causing surging, then no need to fix what isn't broken.
RBob.
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Corvette
Engine: 415
Transmission: six speed
Axle/Gears: Dana44 3.73
Re: Proportional Gain vs 02 mV error?
The 417 mV of error covers the usable range of the O2 sensor. It is both a plus & minus 417 mV from the desired O2 window. So the full range is 834 mV.
If you are not having any issues with closed loop prop gains causing surging, then no need to fix what isn't broken.
RBob.
If you are not having any issues with closed loop prop gains causing surging, then no need to fix what isn't broken.
RBob.
Hi!!
i have some surging, that i want to bet rid of...
the ECM is a ´727, and im using TC, and their new $8D def file...
engine is a 396 with an XFI467 camshaft...
maybe you have an idea, how the gains could be altered?
thank you
Reinhold
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Proportional Gain vs 02 mV error?
Check out this thread:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ng-points.html
It explains the the O2 window along with the proportional gains and there use. Near the end the closed loop control table address are listed for $8D.
RBob.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...ng-points.html
It explains the the O2 window along with the proportional gains and there use. Near the end the closed loop control table address are listed for $8D.
RBob.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
82xCAMAROxZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 27, 2015 12:31 AM
