AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables
#1
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 SLP GTA
Engine: Five Seven
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables
I was looking at the differences between Bins today and decided to check out a 305 TPI's chip just to see if there was a difference so I looked at the AXXF bin which is for a 305/Auto car with speed density and TPI and compared it to a stock AUJP bin. I found that the VE tables were the same, but the AXXF bin had a much more aggressive spark advannce table than the AUJP for the 350 motors. Is there a reason why GM did this? I know that the LB9 and the L98 have the same compression ratio, and same camshaft specs in 91-92 but both used iron heads and both have the same fueling curve? Has anybody ever tried running the more aggressive SA table from the 305 on a 350 motor?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Camden, MI
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1985 IROC-Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: AXXF vs, AUJP spark advance tables
IIRC, a larger bore requires more advance for obvious reasons... and since the main difference between any 305 and 350 is the bore, that may explain the differences you saw.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post