DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Theoretical Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
ploegi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Theoretical Question

Well, for all you folks doing prom tuning, I have a question.

It seems to me, that having fuel pressure change throughout the RPM range simply adds another variable to an already complex equation. Would it not make life easier having fuel pressure remain constant? Thus, removing one variable from the equation?

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 03:26 PM
  #2  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: Theoretical Question

Originally posted by ploegi
Well, for all you folks doing prom tuning, I have a question.

It seems to me, that having fuel pressure change throughout the RPM range simply adds another variable to an already complex equation. Would it not make life easier having fuel pressure remain constant? Thus, removing one variable from the equation?
Thanks
Not really it's more then compensated for by increasing the dynamic range of the injector.
I've been know to use two regulators on a TBI to increase the dynamic range of them. With one being vac referenced, there is too much dynamic range, so a second one that wasn't vac referenced was added to clip the range some.

It's not really a variable anyway. The couple K/Pa difference from baro changes isn't a large change.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2001 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
ploegi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
It is precisely because it alters the characteristics of the injector that I ask.

It would seem to me (and I may be way off base here, not speaking from direct experience......) that having fuel pressure remain constant throughout the RPM range would make tuning changes more predictable. It would also lessen the impact of, say, a cam change. (since the cam will also alter the engines manifold vacuum characteristics.......)

I may be talking out my a$$, but, as I am planning to get into this REAL soon. I want to make my life as easy as possible. (Yes, I am lazy......... but, I love to work on my car)

Thanks Grumpy. I note that you live in Dayton. I manage to make my way down there on occasion, perhaps if there is an event in the not-too-distant future, we could meet..... I would welcome the opportunity to talk with other folks that enjoy this passtime as much as I do.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2001 | 08:23 PM
  #4  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by ploegi
It is precisely because it alters the characteristics of the injector that I ask.

It would seem to me (and I may be way off base here, not speaking from direct experience......) that having fuel pressure remain constant throughout the RPM range would make tuning changes more predictable. It would also lessen the impact of, say, a cam change. (since the cam will also alter the engines manifold vacuum characteristics.......)

I may be talking out my a$$, but, as I am planning to get into this REAL soon. I want to make my life as easy as possible. (Yes, I am lazy......... but, I love to work on my car)

Thanks Grumpy. I note that you live in Dayton. I manage to make my way down there on occasion, perhaps if there is an event in the not-too-distant future, we could meet..... I would welcome the opportunity to talk with other folks that enjoy this passtime as much as I do.

Guess you've never heard of the EFI POWWOWs that I host 2x a year.

By making the FPR vac compenstaed it's actually simplier to tune.
It makes the baro correction less of an issue.
When you get to actually looking into the tables from a TBI to MAP TPI they really aren't that different.

I've tried even vac referencing none referenced systems and it makes for an interesting final result <g>
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 08:42 AM
  #5  
ploegi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 28
From: Adrian, Mi, USA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
POWWOW? Hhhhmmm. Let me know when the next one is.... You can email me at brianp@aix.cc

Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Also, the vacuum on an FPR helps reduce the amount of fuel that is delievered to the injectors in idle, light throttle and deceleration. There is a limit of how short the injector pulse width will go. The vacuum's lowering of the fuel pressure in these circumstances helps the ecm keep from needing too short of a pulse width.

Tuning the VE Tables is far simpler than people think.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adamki2000
Brakes
24
Dec 20, 2015 10:40 PM
masonta
Power Adders
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:40 PM
Bubbajones_ya
Electronics
4
Aug 31, 2015 12:02 PM
ezobens
DIY PROM
8
Aug 19, 2015 10:29 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.