Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

LS1 t56 vs LT1 t56 length..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #1  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
LS1 t56 vs LT1 t56 length..

Hello,

already looking into the next big modification for the car, either forced induction or swapping over to an LS1.. A quick question for the LS1 folks..

Is the t56 from the LS1 the same overall length as the one from the LT1? I am pretty sure it is which would mean my conversion crossmember would work for either LT or LS engines and I would just need motor mounts..

Hypothetically speaking of course
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
Drakar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
ok, my information is based on what is the same.

if 82-02 driveshafts can be swapped and the position of the rear axle from 85-92 is the same as 93-97, and 93-97 share the same design as 98-02 and 82-02 share the same floor pan. I would hazzard a guess that the LS1 T-56 would be the same length as the LT1 version


(Also since I haven't measured it I could be all wrong.)
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #3  
scottland's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
assuming you buy a LS1 + an LS1 t56, then everything will work fine. transmission crossmember and all.

if you try to use your LT1 t56 + a LS1, things won't bolt up
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #4  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Same length, different input shaft splines, different type of yoke also. Other than that, same thing, LS1 T-56's being slightly weaker than the LT1 counterparts.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
Drakar's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally posted by pasky
Same length, different input shaft splines, different type of yoke also. Other than that, same thing, LS1 T-56's being slightly weaker than the LT1 counterparts.
Now why would GM make a weaker Tranny for a stronger engine?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
I honestly don't know, but its the truth, look it up for yourself.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #7  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
This may explain it:

Around '98, Tremec bought out BWA (Borg Warner Automotive), who of course owned Muncie. Production of the transmission was moved from Muncie, IN to Tremec's Mexico plant.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #8  
FLYNLOW92rs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
Originally posted by pasky
Same length, different input shaft splines, different type of yoke also. Other than that, same thing, LS1 T-56's being slightly weaker than the LT1 counterparts.
Interesting, but aren't both T56's rated at 450 lb-ft for torque capacity?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #9  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
No, neither is. The viper T-56 is rated at 450 LB's I believe. Im not sure on the 94-97 T-56's or LS1 T-56's. I do hear stories from shop owners on camaroz28.com of people braking LS1 T-56's at a 10:1 ratio over the LT1 T-56's. As far as thier actual ratings, im not sure, the 93's were rated lowest.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #10  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Just found out the 94-97 and 93 G92 T-56's are rated to 400 lbs. The non G92 93 T-56's were rated 350 LB's.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #11  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Oh J', the Input shaft on the LS1 T-56's are 1.5" longer than the T-56 version. If your throwing in an LS1 to the LS1 t-56, there will be no problem. I have hear dthat you can swap the shaft though.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:19 PM
  #12  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
94-97 is rated at 450, 93 with 2.97 first gear is 400, 3.36 first gear 350 ft lbs.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #13  
kevinc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 3
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Before swapping in the LS1, I was running an L98 with an LT1 T56 trans. Used the same Skulte Performance Designs T56 crossmember, same driveshaft also for both, no problems.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #14  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
Thanks for the rapid response! Figured it would be the same, never hurts to ask though..

If I did it I would swap in a whole assy. LS1 plus t56.. then sell off the LT1, harness, t56 and associated goodies..

I am just tossing around the idea of going LS since if I do a forced induction LT it would cost about the same as a head cam LS swap.. Though I am not sure if it is worth the trouble after putting in so much effort into the LTX swap (just rebuilt my t56, added heads and cam) and with a bit more will be up in the H&C LS territory anyway..

Last edited by J's T/A; Jul 28, 2004 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #15  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Are you nuts ? You've already got the vette accessories, now add the BBSDesigns single turbo kit, and a water to air intercooler, one of the ptk kit equipped guys twisted 454 rwhp 567 rwtq on a STOCK LT1 with a T66 and 9 psi, yes some LS1's might be able to get that hp figure, but the torque and curve they arent going to be able to match, you've got a nice setup, dont go trading it for something that might work a little better when what you've got can be made to work far better.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 07:44 PM
  #16  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
AHA! a turbo kit.. been looking for one, do you have a link?

yep I am leaning more toward keeping it LT based thanks for the NUTs! input

EDIT: found the link, looks interesting, cheaper than the corvette vortech..

Last edited by J's T/A; Jul 28, 2004 at 07:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 08:14 PM
  #17  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Since you've already got the link to the turbo

Add that with this intercooler http://66.70.20.245/store/scripts/pr...?idproduct=135

Where the battery normally mounts on the passenger side, a few other little items, and you'll be the new talk of the power adder forum, just sucks cause i was hoping to do it first
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #18  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
Interesting stuff,

Wouldn't air-to-air be a bit easier to run?

Second, the BBS stuff, looks a bit shaky, based in PRico and lots of small print on the kit, such as "not tested on angle-plug heads"

Not knocking it but do you know anyone running the kit??

You will still be the one to do it first, if I do this it will be on a fresh shortblock with a blower/turbo cam in it.. I still have a H&C swap to wear out first but may collect parts in the meantime..

Wait didn't I start this thread talking about transmissions??

Last edited by J's T/A; Jul 28, 2004 at 09:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #19  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Forgot about him not testing it on any angled plug heads yet, he just doesnt have extra heads laying around to test fit, a few people on the boards are running his kit, just none that i know of with an LT1, I believe SLP's have a disclaimer about angled plug heads, but we all know they clear LT1's fine, worst case scenario im prepared to go to the straight plug impala iron heads in order to run the turbo.

The air2water would be the easiest to plumb, effect your cooling efficiency the least, and fit the best, just 2 short boost pipes, a heat exchanger in front of the condenser, and a water pump for some flow.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #20  
J's T/A's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: Idaho Falls
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: LTX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 strengthed 7.5 inch
alrighty, thanks for the info.. I am going to give this a serious look for my next build thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.