specs
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: greenville, OH
Car: 86 Firebird, 2002 Monte Carlo, 91 v
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
specs
com 270 h-10 cam
stock 79 350
416 heads
600 cfm edelbrock
Holley street dominator 300-38
.039 head gasket
I calculated my compression guessing at -4cc for the pistons and stock deck height of .015 and it came to 10.31:1. Would that be ok with 93 octane or will I blow holes in my pistons
stock 79 350
416 heads
600 cfm edelbrock
Holley street dominator 300-38
.039 head gasket
I calculated my compression guessing at -4cc for the pistons and stock deck height of .015 and it came to 10.31:1. Would that be ok with 93 octane or will I blow holes in my pistons
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
The overlap in that cam will bleed off some cylinder pressure.
But with a good tune, you should be ok.
But with a good tune, you should be ok.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: greenville, OH
Car: 86 Firebird, 2002 Monte Carlo, 91 v
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
thanks that puts my mind at ease. I'll probably run octane boost just to be safe and it wouldn't be past me to splurge on $6/gallon turbo blue. Just read an interesting article
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/72498/
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/72498/
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 814
Likes: 1
From: Savannah GA
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: 383 chevy
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10-bolt, posi, 3.42 ratio
i was too, but i honestly felt like if you're gonna run the booster, why not run the cheap stuff first? save more money in the long run. assuming you can get away with that, anyway.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
If the motor is a "stock" 79 350, you won't have to worry about any 10.anything compression.
It will have roughly 15cc dish pistons.
With a more realistic .025" of deck clearance, and the actual properties of a "stock" 79 350, I come up with about 9.3:1 CR.
I don't think you'll have any trouble with it.
It would run better with the XE268; those heads can use the bigger exhaust lobe.
It will have roughly 15cc dish pistons.
With a more realistic .025" of deck clearance, and the actual properties of a "stock" 79 350, I come up with about 9.3:1 CR.
I don't think you'll have any trouble with it.
It would run better with the XE268; those heads can use the bigger exhaust lobe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TX-SleeperC5
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 24, 2015 03:13 PM




