Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.
View Poll Results: What should i do?
put in Stock 2.8l remanufactured engine?
4
17.39%
or put in used 5.0l carb w/700r4 trans?
19
82.61%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

What engine should i put in my bird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2006 | 10:37 PM
  #1  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
What engine should i put in my bird

First of all i have a 1984 pontiac firebird with the 2.8l 700r4 trans and 3.23 gears, what engine should i put in? need opinions. id put in a 350 but the gas prices r too high, so if my motor goes out i wanted to go the best route.

P.S. if u think i should put in the 3.4 just add a reply. cuz i forgot to add the 1 to the poll. thanx

Last edited by 84'Firebird; Jun 3, 2006 at 04:33 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2006 | 11:23 PM
  #2  
Tobias05's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
If I were you, I'd try to find a 3.4 longblock. The 3.4 is externally the same size as your 2.8, but offers an extra 50 ft-lbs of tourque, and 25 more horsepower than the 2.8. Everything will bolt right up IIRC, and you can top it off w/ an aftermarket cam, a little headwork, and a bit of a tune. I bet you could get 225 horse/275 ft-lbs w/ a 3.4.

You can probably drop at least a second off your quarter mile and you'll still have that near 50/50 weight distribution common w/ our v6 brethren.

Plus it'll look just as stock as before...better to fool ppl into races with.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
well i was looking on this new motor from gm, its a replacement 4 the carbed 2.8 s10 motors but wasnt sure if itll work or not?(3.4)
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by Bandit84
well i was looking on this new motor from gm, its a replacement 4 the carbed 2.8 s10 motors but wasnt sure if itll work or not?(3.4)
look for the thread 3.4 swap boogie ?

the 3.4 is a bolt in swap. Everything is reused.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #5  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
Originally Posted by Bandit84
well i was looking on this new motor from gm, its a replacement 4 the carbed 2.8 s10 motors but wasnt sure if itll work or not?(3.4)

I think GM discontinued that motor right?
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 02:15 PM
  #6  
Firebat's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,786
Likes: 3
My vote is a 3.4L
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
83camaroMN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 1998 Mustang
Engine: 3.8L V6
Transmission: Automatic with overdrive
Axle/Gears: 2.73:1 axle ratio
Originally Posted by 1989karr
I think GM discontinued that motor right?
I think hes talking about the reman. 2.8L there like new. But yea they stoped making 2.8L
----------
I would stay with the 2.8L they are good motors. IMO

Last edited by 83camaroMN; Jun 3, 2006 at 04:25 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #8  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
Originally Posted by 1989karr
I think GM discontinued that motor right?
Not sure but i seen it on this website Chevy 350 Engines, New Chevy Crate Engines & Rebuilt Engines for Chevrolet . it said it was a new product so i think they remade them.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #9  
83camaroMN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 1998 Mustang
Engine: 3.8L V6
Transmission: Automatic with overdrive
Axle/Gears: 2.73:1 axle ratio
Originally Posted by Bandit84
id put in a 350 but the gas prices r too high, so if my motor goes out i wanted to go the best route.
and if you are worried about gas prices stay away from the 5.0L gas hogs
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 03:41 AM
  #10  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
oh, seems that they still do make the thing

but like the others, my vote is on 3.4.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #11  
Tobias05's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally Posted by 83camaroMN
I think hes talking about the reman. 2.8L there like new. But yea they stoped making 2.8L
----------
I would stay with the 2.8L they are good motors. IMO
why stay with a 2.8, if a 3.4 is externally identical, AND has an extra 50ft-lbs of torque and an extra 25 horses?

sounds like you're shooting yourself in the foot if you ask me...
----------
Originally Posted by 83camaroMN
and if you are worried about gas prices stay away from the 5.0L gas hogs
Not out to flame you or anything, but my v8 (350HO, carb, 700r4) just got 23MPG on a 900 mile road trip, averaging 80MPH the whole way...and I've seen other members on here w/ more rear gear, and more horsepower, getting even better fuel mileage than myself.

Last edited by Tobias05; Jun 4, 2006 at 01:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #12  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
How good r the 3.4l like in dependability becuz i want something dependable with some power.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #13  
83camaroMN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 1998 Mustang
Engine: 3.8L V6
Transmission: Automatic with overdrive
Axle/Gears: 2.73:1 axle ratio
Originally Posted by Tobias05
why stay with a 2.8, if a 3.4 is externally identical, AND has an extra 50ft-lbs of torque and an extra 25 horses?

sounds like you're shooting yourself in the foot if you ask me...
----------


Not out to flame you or anything, but my v8 (350HO, carb, 700r4) just got 23MPG on a 900 mile road trip, averaging 80MPH the whole way...and I've seen other members on here w/ more rear gear, and more horsepower, getting even better fuel mileage than myself.

iv seen his car and his motor is fine it would be a waste of money and time to put a 3.4 or 5.7 in it when theres nothing wrong with the 2.8L
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #14  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
yeah, im might go ahead with the 3.4l to give it alittle more power, like ppl said the 3.4 has just as much power as the 5.0, let me know how good the 3.4 is.
----------
Originally Posted by 83camaroMN
iv seen his car and his motor is fine it would be a waste of money and time to put a 3.4 or 5.7 in it when theres nothing wrong with the 2.8L
im looking to add some more hp to my bird. i think the 2.8l only has a 107hp stock. mine i probaly have 140hp with the upgrades and the stuff done to it.

Last edited by 84'Firebird; Jun 5, 2006 at 03:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #15  
nimrod_sixty9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Okeechobee, Florida
Car: '91 RS Camaro
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Id go a 3.8! One out of a newer camaro or bird... I had a 99' 3.8 camaro and that thing was incredibly fast and great on gas! Thats just my opinion, if your wanting the gas milege. BTW there are quite a few aftermarket parts for that motor too!

What do you guys think about the 3.8?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:43 PM
  #16  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
can u convert the 3.8l into a carb, i want that old school feeling.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #17  
nimrod_sixty9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Okeechobee, Florida
Car: '91 RS Camaro
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Not sure?

That would kill its gas milege though... You can get bigger injectors and throttle body and all that stuff!

If you want milege and power, Id go 3.8, and upgrade the fuel system (not needed).

If you want the carb and power, I would go 305, no question about it...

Last edited by nimrod_sixty9; Jun 5, 2006 at 03:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #18  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
I like the power of the 3.8, but the other V-6 guys say it's a real hassle to do. But I think they refer to it like that if you swap over the wiring too. Not to sure about the carb idea, but i think you'll need a new tranny and all that other stuff where as the 3.4 reuses more less what you got.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #19  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The 3.4 mounts like the 2.8. There's a tech article about that swap. I've never heard any reliability issues with the 3.4.

The 3.8 is a completely different animal. If you want old-school, you aren't talking about anything made since the 3rd gens came out. If you get something later, you're going to have fun putting a distributor on it.

3.4 or small block Chevy. Or, be realistic and keep the 2.8.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #20  
niceroc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 1
From: Palatine, IL
Car: 87 iroc
Engine: 454 .030 over
Transmission: th-350
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
put a lt1 t56 in it... ive seen them for less then 2g's for the pair... you can get like 30 mpg with them tooo
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #21  
dwillis's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Beech Bluff,TN
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:08
455 Pontiac
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #22  
nimrod_sixty9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Okeechobee, Florida
Car: '91 RS Camaro
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.08
J/k

niceroc, where is the how to on that? You should link, it would help talk the guy into it!

Last edited by nimrod_sixty9; Jun 7, 2006 at 11:12 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #23  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Or you could just read the sticky. . .
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #24  
dwillis's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Beech Bluff,TN
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:08
I have one I could sell him too...That needs to be built....I put a 400 pontiac in an 87 GTA T-5....It was awesome...
DO THIS MAN>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>455 ALL THE WAY!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #25  
83trans-am350's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Car: 83 Trans-am recaro editon
Engine: chevy 350 from a 76 gmc truck
Transmission: 700r4
I have an 83 trans am i put a 350 in it with a holley 650 and the gas mil is not that bad and the parts are so easy to get forget the 5.0 and go with a vortec 4.3 liter or a 5.7 the 4.3 is very reliable and close to a v8 in torq
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #26  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
i would but i want something with a carb.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #27  
JeremyNYR's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
I think your goals are contradicting if you want the old school feel of a carb, yet want good gas milage. smaller engine + carb will most likely give you worse gas milage and certainly less power than a larger engine with fuel injection.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #28  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
I think the 3.4 crate engine comes ready for a carb right? I think that would probably be your best bet if you really want carb and some decent gas mileage. Anyone else have thoughts on this??
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #29  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
yeah i think im going to get a 3.4l, im worried if i get the reman. 2.8l itll go bad again becuz of the crankshaft.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #30  
KniteWulfe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Korea/Wisconsin
Car: 91 Firebird, (miss my 87 Formula)
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
If you want gas mileage buy a 4cyl daily driver and keep the bird as a project car. As was already said the LT1 swap would be my 1st choice. Not too expensive really and just takes some time. Gas mileage on the LT1s isnt that bad. Probably better MPG than any carbed V6.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #31  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
At this point if it gets better than 15mpg it gets good gas milage to me.lol
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
83trans-am350's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Car: 83 Trans-am recaro editon
Engine: chevy 350 from a 76 gmc truck
Transmission: 700r4
A fuel injected motor is not at all a bad thing and you can just about put a carb on anything if you really want to its the wallet that it hurts and the 4.3 leaves alot of room in front of the engine for turbo or what ever else If i could do it again I would go with the 5.7 or 4.3
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #33  
Speed_Kills's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, Sc
4.3L
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #34  
84'Firebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
Car: 84' Trans Am
Engine: 5.0 H.O. L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Disc Brakes
can u add a carb to a 4.3l?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #35  
nimrod_sixty9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Okeechobee, Florida
Car: '91 RS Camaro
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Originally Posted by Bandit84
can u add a carb to a 4.3l?
Ive seen it done. Dont know with what though... from what your wanting from a motor Id say go 4.3 or 5.0.. You can do alot with both engines and there are so many parts out there for them...

And you should be able to swap fairly easy..
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #36  
dwillis's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: Beech Bluff,TN
Car: 1991 Trans Am Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:08
There is a carbbed V-6 in some older astro vans..A 4bbl at that...Maby you could find one in a salvage yard
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #37  
83trans-am350's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Car: 83 Trans-am recaro editon
Engine: chevy 350 from a 76 gmc truck
Transmission: 700r4
Yeah you can put a carb on a 4.3 I have an 88 astro van for a work van its got a tbi which is almost the same thing just the comp. runs it and it gets good gas for a van i would find one out of probably a 93 gmc with the vortec seriously that engine is bad *** i had one it would light the tires up nice plus it did not eat my pocket. Im sure you would really like that engine in a t-a. If you dont end up doing it i will next year probably i believe that engine stock produced 300 ft lbs of torque and if you wanted to get crazy with it you will probably have the room for dual turbos just dont let piggys see under your hood lol
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2006 | 10:51 PM
  #38  
KniteWulfe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Korea/Wisconsin
Car: 91 Firebird, (miss my 87 Formula)
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally Posted by 83trans-am350
Yeah you can put a carb on a 4.3 I have an 88 astro van for a work van its got a tbi which is almost the same thing just the comp. runs it and it gets good gas for a van i would find one out of probably a 93 gmc with the vortec seriously that engine is bad *** i had one it would light the tires up nice plus it did not eat my pocket. Im sure you would really like that engine in a t-a. If you dont end up doing it i will next year probably i believe that engine stock produced 300 ft lbs of torque and if you wanted to get crazy with it you will probably have the room for dual turbos just dont let piggys see under your hood lol
Well, the regular vortec was 200 hp dunno the torque, but the turbo one from the syclones was 280 hp and 360 ft-lbs of torque. Yeah those 4.3s are pretty powerful.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
Catcher55
Body
4
Aug 15, 2015 07:08 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.