New buildup, some questions
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Gettysburg,PA
Car: 1986 T/A,91 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305, 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH700-R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.73,3.23
New buildup, some questions
Got a 350 block been sitting a while I would like a strong street engine, pump gas, not a daily driver just a weekend cruiser. I got the block for cheap it had been sitting for a long time.
1974 350 block going to have to go .030 over
stock bottom end (rods and crank)
hp345np-30 pistons (9.97 with a 58cc head)
or
hp423ncp-30 pistons(9.45 with a 58cc)
.040 head gaskets
#416 heads
XE262 cam
Performer Rpm Intake
using CC Carb setup
3.42 or 3.73's
I tried using the DCR calculator and its not coming out right.
I dont know which of the pistons would give me a better CR to run on 93 at the most.
I dont want a HP monster just enough so I can keep up with the cars of today.
Yes I've searched just so many people have different answers to every little thing
1974 350 block going to have to go .030 over
stock bottom end (rods and crank)
hp345np-30 pistons (9.97 with a 58cc head)
or
hp423ncp-30 pistons(9.45 with a 58cc)
.040 head gaskets
#416 heads
XE262 cam
Performer Rpm Intake
using CC Carb setup
3.42 or 3.73's
I tried using the DCR calculator and its not coming out right.
I dont know which of the pistons would give me a better CR to run on 93 at the most.
I dont want a HP monster just enough so I can keep up with the cars of today.
Yes I've searched just so many people have different answers to every little thing
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'd go with the larger dish. I assume you're going to zero-deck the block.
What are you going to do to the heads?
You'll be using the spreadbore version of the RPM, right?
What are you going to do to the heads?
You'll be using the spreadbore version of the RPM, right?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Gettysburg,PA
Car: 1986 T/A,91 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305, 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH700-R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.73,3.23
Re: New buildup, some questions
Im going to port those out and put the 1.94's in.
zero deck the block
squarebore if they make one if not ill have to find one, Ive got a regular performer in the box but from what I've read might as well keep the LG4 intake since its about the same(as the performer)
zero deck the block
squarebore if they make one if not ill have to find one, Ive got a regular performer in the box but from what I've read might as well keep the LG4 intake since its about the same(as the performer)
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Car: 1982 - Z28
Engine: 350 / CCC Q-Jet
Transmission: THM-700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt - 3.73
Re: New buildup, some questions
Packmule,
LG4 may not be exactly the same as a performer but it's pretty darn close. Personally, the Rochester is an incredible carb IF you take a few hours to read a book or two and learn the proper way to install, adjust, & maintain it. "IMPO" it has much beter idle characteristics than the run of the mill aftermarket "Super Carb". And requires less "tinkering" once it's right. Your money could possibly be spend elsewhere and get REAL performance gains (I.E. Exhaust) for less money than the EdelBrock and an aftermarket square bore.
Just my
kboehringer
LG4 may not be exactly the same as a performer but it's pretty darn close. Personally, the Rochester is an incredible carb IF you take a few hours to read a book or two and learn the proper way to install, adjust, & maintain it. "IMPO" it has much beter idle characteristics than the run of the mill aftermarket "Super Carb". And requires less "tinkering" once it's right. Your money could possibly be spend elsewhere and get REAL performance gains (I.E. Exhaust) for less money than the EdelBrock and an aftermarket square bore.
Just my
kboehringer
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: mount airy md
Car: 1991 caprice / 96 caprice
Engine: 4?? bbc / lt-1
Transmission: 700r4 / 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 4.10/ 3.73
Re: New buildup, some questions
Packmule,
LG4 may not be exactly the same as a performer but it's pretty darn close. Personally, the Rochester is an incredible carb IF you take a few hours to read a book or two and learn the proper way to install, adjust, & maintain it. "IMPO" it has much beter idle characteristics than the run of the mill aftermarket "Super Carb". And requires less "tinkering" once it's right. Your money could possibly be spend elsewhere and get REAL performance gains (I.E. Exhaust) for less money than the EdelBrock and an aftermarket square bore.
Just my
kboehringer
LG4 may not be exactly the same as a performer but it's pretty darn close. Personally, the Rochester is an incredible carb IF you take a few hours to read a book or two and learn the proper way to install, adjust, & maintain it. "IMPO" it has much beter idle characteristics than the run of the mill aftermarket "Super Carb". And requires less "tinkering" once it's right. Your money could possibly be spend elsewhere and get REAL performance gains (I.E. Exhaust) for less money than the EdelBrock and an aftermarket square bore.
Just my
kboehringer
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Gettysburg,PA
Car: 1986 T/A,91 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305, 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH700-R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.73,3.23
Re: New buildup, some questions
No im keeping the CC carb i was talking about the intake only. I had a 73 el camino that had one and even after it was rebuilt it was junk. too young and stupid to do it myself. but this one is good it starts right up and runs good, just the motor leaks too much, and not keeping the 305 in it. Going to check out the carb when it comes off make sure its all ready for the next engine
Last edited by PackmuleTA; Nov 1, 2007 at 04:21 PM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
If you're going to use the CC q-jet, you need a spreadbore intake - that's why I said what I said in my first reply. Squarebore intake would require an adapter - not the best way to go. So, get the spreadbore version of the Performer RPM intake.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






