Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

TRW and Manley Piston prices....why such a difference?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 05:20 PM
  #1  
mult68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-56
TRW and Manley Piston prices....why such a difference?????

Here are prices from Scoogin Dickeys website...

Manley Flat Top Forged Pistons:
-Bore: 4.030"
-Stroke: 3.750"
-Rod Length: 5.700"
-Pin Height: 1.560"
-Weight: 482g
-C/R: 11.0:1 w/64cc heads
-Pin Type: P or F (whatever that means)
-Dome volume: -3.5cc
==Price: $479.00==

TRW Flat Top 2VR Forged Pistons:
- Bore: 4.000" w/ +.030" over bore
- Stroke: 3.750"
- Rod Length: 5.700"
- Pin Height: 1.565"
- Weight: 505g
- C/R: 10.7:1 w/64cc heads
- Pin Type: P or F
- Dome Volume: -3.4cc
==Price: $41.00/piston; $328/set==

TRW Lightweight Flat Top 2VR Forged Pistons:
- Bore: 4.000" w/ +.030" over bore
- Stroke: 3.750"
- Rod Length: 5.700"
- Pin Height: 1.430"
- Weight: 497g
- C/R: 10.7:1 w/64cc heads
- Pin Type: P or F
- Dome Volume: -3.4cc
==Price: $30.50/piston; $244/set==

And why are the Lightweigt TRW pistons cheaper than the regular TRW pistons? Im confused...thanks in advance for the help.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 05:37 PM
  #2  
SoCo80p's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
the price seem to be becuase of the pin height if you notice there diffrent, one might be for the stock 5.7 rod and one for the 6.0 rod. also one might include pins and the other doesnt, i bet the lightweight ones dont.

[This message has been edited by TempesT68 (edited November 26, 2001).]
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 05:52 PM
  #3  
mult68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Carrollton, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-56
All three are for 5.700" rod lengths....could it have to do with the weight and name?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 09:26 PM
  #4  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
There's some kind of mistake...

Look at the last 2 rods. Note that they say that the stroke and rod lengths are the same, but that the pin height is different. That is not possible. In a SBC, the sum of ½ the stroke, plus the rod length, plus the pin height, must equal 9.025" +.000" -.030". The third piston meets that requirement. The first and second pistons, if you add up all the numbers, come out to 9.135" and 9.14"; that would make the piston top stick out of the block approximately 1/8". Not in my motor thank you. However, if you use ½ the stroke of a 350 (½ of 3.48", or 1.74"), they work out to 9.005" and 9.000" respectively Much happier now. The first 2 are 350 pistons, the third is a 383 piston.

Part numbers would help identify them properly.

The TRW pistons are basically forged heavy-duty replacements; the Manleys are specialty racing parts. If you see them side by side, I think you'd understand instantly why they are so different in price.

P or F = Pressed pin or Floating pin.

------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports

[This message has been edited by RB83L69 (edited November 26, 2001).]
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2001 | 09:35 PM
  #5  
MorgRS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Price difference
Could be the Material used.
Skirt design.
If they use a tapered pin.
Ring package design.
Give'em a call, both companies should tell ya what'll work best for your needs.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2001 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
johnsjj2's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 2
From: Monticello, IN USA
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5 (gonna buy the farm)
I don't want to knock any manufacturer, but Manley pistons are in the same area as JE, Ross, and SRP. TRW's are "the next best thing", but more than adequate for me. Now to keep everyone happy, this is my opinion. No, I don't have facts from each company to show this. But this is what I believe.



------------------
Joshua Johnston
1991 Z-28
350, T-5, K&N, Ported Vortec heads, Edelbrock RPM, Holley 750 D.P., HEI, 11.07:1 CR, Comp Cams Roller-.510"/.520"-282*/288* dur., Shorty Headers, Dual 2.5 Exhaust, Dynomax Bullet Mufflers, T&R Motorsports custom air intake, Bald tires
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BAMiller
TPI
4
Sep 14, 2015 06:38 PM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
NastyEngines
Group Purchases
4
Sep 8, 2015 10:14 AM
greenyone
TPI
3
Sep 2, 2015 03:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.