350 build Feedback Needed
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Car: 87
Engine: TPI L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
350 build Feedback Needed
i recently purchased a 89 Trans Am with the TBI 305/700r4 (blah) 2 weeks later i purchased an 91 L05 oilpan to pistons. it has been rebuilt with stock roller setup bt rebuilt with high-compression pistons, walls are smooth as butter. 2 days ago i purchased a set of completely reworked and ported '72 #882 heads rods springs etc from my buddy(off his 406stroker) also i purchased an Torker 2 singleplane, 670 HollyStreetAvenger rebuilt w spring kit. I plan on changing the stock .38- roller with flat-tappet comp .488 .488 (all from 406) i am mainly wondering how much overall power HP/TQ im looking at with the .488 flat setup and compared to saving time and trouble and just putting the top components on it with the stock roller .38- setup. Also what would the stock roller setup with my components make if i decide keep it roller? Thanks
Read more: http://forums.chevyhiperformance.com...#ixzz20j0Ky4Us
Read more: http://forums.chevyhiperformance.com...#ixzz20j0Ky4Us
Re: 350 build Feedback Needed
i recently purchased a 89 Trans Am with the TBI 305/700r4 (blah) 2 weeks later i purchased an 91 L05 oilpan to pistons. it has been rebuilt with stock roller setup bt rebuilt with high-compression pistons, walls are smooth as butter. 2 days ago i purchased a set of completely reworked and ported '72 #882 heads rods springs etc from my buddy(off his 406stroker) also i purchased an Torker 2 singleplane, 670 HollyStreetAvenger rebuilt w spring kit. I plan on changing the stock .38- roller with flat-tappet comp .488 .488 (all from 406) i am mainly wondering how much overall power HP/TQ im looking at with the .488 flat setup and compared to saving time and trouble and just putting the top components on it with the stock roller .38- setup. Also what would the stock roller setup with my components make if i decide keep it roller? Thanks
Read more: http://forums.chevyhiperformance.com...#ixzz20j0Ky4Us
Read more: http://forums.chevyhiperformance.com...#ixzz20j0Ky4Us
...Javier
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: 350 build Feedback Needed
Sounds like a poor combination to me. 882 heads are junk heads, and that cam is probably a low lift flat tappet cam. neither of those is doing that motor any favors. Plus, a single plane intake is all wrong for those heads, that cam and that little carb. You really need to do some homework to understand what types of parts will work best together.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Car: 87
Engine: TPI L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 350 build Feedback Needed
Sounds like a poor combination to me. 882 heads are junk heads, and that cam is probably a low lift flat tappet cam. neither of those is doing that motor any favors. Plus, a single plane intake is all wrong for those heads, that cam and that little carb. You really need to do some homework to understand what types of parts will work best together.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Car: 87
Engine: TPI L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 350 build Feedback Needed
Would you explain to me exactly why that wouldn't be a good combination, why dualplane would be better, cam is .292 duration, 670 wouldnt be bigenuf?
Last edited by nikk2themax; Jul 15, 2012 at 07:22 PM. Reason: .292 duration
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM





