3" 450+ hp
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 2
From: WI north
Car: 88 Firebird
Engine: 302 SBC
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.27 Dana 44
3" 450+ hp
Looking at the Dynomax website, I find that they have a system to rate the horsepower limit on their mufflers. They call it the "Powertech Index." I studied that and then found their pdf file that shows the specs on their race mufflers. They rate all their 3"ID mufflers that use a straight pipe through the muffler to be sufficient for over 450hp. I say 450 because they seem to quit counting there.
My question is: Wouldn't the rest of the 3" exhaust pipes be able to handle the same horsepower or more than the muffler? Most on this board put a limit on 3" cat-back or no cat systems at around 300-325hp. Are the bends that limiting on horsepower?
My question is: Wouldn't the rest of the 3" exhaust pipes be able to handle the same horsepower or more than the muffler? Most on this board put a limit on 3" cat-back or no cat systems at around 300-325hp. Are the bends that limiting on horsepower?
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 2
From: WI north
Car: 88 Firebird
Engine: 302 SBC
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.27 Dana 44
Here is the 'powertech index' and a list of their mufflers.
http://www.dynomax.com/documents/race_specs.pdf
3" straight through mufflers have a single index rating of 1000. 1000/2.2= 454.5 hp. Am I doing this right?
Can their mufflers be less restrictive than the rest of the pipes?
http://www.dynomax.com/documents/race_specs.pdf
3" straight through mufflers have a single index rating of 1000. 1000/2.2= 454.5 hp. Am I doing this right?
Can their mufflers be less restrictive than the rest of the pipes?
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 364
Likes: 2
From: WI north
Car: 88 Firebird
Engine: 302 SBC
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 4.27 Dana 44
I am not looking for suggestions on a system to handle 450hp.
I wondering what to think here. People on this board have said many times over that a single 3" won't allow an engine to produce that kind of power and yet Dynomax is providing some published evidence (as far as I can tell) that it could.
Dynomax also lists a 3" that does not look to be a straight through design and it is only good for 155hp. Another has a 3" on one side (I'm guessing inlet) and two 2.5 on the other side that is good for 290hp.
Are the doubters using inferior flow systems that use poor components or is Dynomax risking their reputation on their claims?
I wondering what to think here. People on this board have said many times over that a single 3" won't allow an engine to produce that kind of power and yet Dynomax is providing some published evidence (as far as I can tell) that it could.
Dynomax also lists a 3" that does not look to be a straight through design and it is only good for 155hp. Another has a 3" on one side (I'm guessing inlet) and two 2.5 on the other side that is good for 290hp.
Are the doubters using inferior flow systems that use poor components or is Dynomax risking their reputation on their claims?
There are people on here making more than 300 horse on 3" pipe, but I would think that after you get much above that you could probably gain quite a bit by going with better exhaust.
Ben
Ben
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 1
From: Medford, Oregon
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by Momar
There are people on here making more than 300 horse on 3" pipe, but I would think that after you get much above that you could probably gain quite a bit by going with better exhaust.
Ben
There are people on here making more than 300 horse on 3" pipe, but I would think that after you get much above that you could probably gain quite a bit by going with better exhaust.
Ben
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
luvofjah
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
13
Sep 26, 2015 08:28 PM





Or some dumps. How about some 1 chamber mufflers? 