duals vs 4" mufflex system
duals vs 4" mufflex system
I see everyone stuggling trying to fit duals under a car that basically isn't made to have duals and have any ground clearance.. My question is does anyone have the mufflex 4" system and how do they like it? Seems like it would be a lot less hassle and can support a lot of hp.
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
price and sound prolly plays a roll in what folks are doing. the duals sound better (IMO) and are usually cheaper.
you could always do what Willie did tho, run in stock location...
you could always do what Willie did tho, run in stock location...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: Can you say stroke?!?!
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Willie's system is killer, especially in person. The problem is that Willie shelled out some cash to get his done right. The Mufflex system is pretty good also. I love mine but I do not recommend using the hardware they send with it. When you get it put on, have an exhaust shop do it. They can put on custom hangers and make it fit much better than it does coming directly from Mufllex. I paid $80 to have them cut some tubing and tuck it up nice and tight. You can't even tell that there is 4 inches of sewer tube under the car.
Hope that helps.
Hope that helps.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM





