Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Back Preasure Good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
Bitchin89RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Car: '89 RS
Engine: LT4
Transmission: 700R4
Back Preasure Good or bad?

Ok, I've heard alot of talk about back preasure... and I was under the influence that back preasure is bad... and you want a negative back preasure.... but my friend told me that you some back preasure for you low end torque applications.. anyone know anything about this back preasure myth?
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #2  
TexasLT1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 3
From: Angleton, TX
Car: '92 RS
lol, Trevor, I'm gonna save you some trouble and just tell you to search before you open one of the biggest cans of worms on this site. Trust me, you'll find plenty.
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #3  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
This has been beaten to death over and over again. To sum it all up, backpressure is bad. Like stated above, do a search.
Old Oct 20, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #4  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Backpressure is bad. Period. The reason you don't see 4" duals on cars however, is not because of backpressure, but velocity. Huge exhaust pipes will have less backpressure, but also alot less velocity. The higher the velocity through the pipes, the better the scavenging effect to empty the cylinders. This means more horsepower and torque.

Basically, you want as little back pressure as possible and as high an exhaust velocity as possible.
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
Bitchin89RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Car: '89 RS
Engine: LT4
Transmission: 700R4
Sorry bout that, didn't know everyone was so touchy about this subject i just wanted to know before i went and did anything stupid....
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Well, pardner, you're new in these here parts, so we ain't gunna hold it again' ya.

The velocity part is really about the header primary tube size - keep it small enough to keep the velocity up but not too small to become a restriction. 1-5/8" primary headers are fine for most street-driven applications. 1-1/2" will be restrictive, 1-3/4" will slow down the exhaust at low RPMs and inhibit the scavaging effect produced by the velocity.

Once you get down beyond the collector, you just want to keep the stuff moving without undo restriction. But, as stated, at that point 4" isn't likely to do you any more good than 3". However, 2-1/4" trying to move that stuff on back is a different story.

Seems it all has to be repeated for somebody every couple of weeks, so this should take us into November.
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac



Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86IROC112
Body
47
Apr 9, 2016 10:20 PM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 22, 2015 08:17 PM
bbsr72
Brakes
0
Aug 12, 2015 10:44 AM
squiggy2
TPI
4
Aug 9, 2015 09:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.