Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Flowmaster mufflers - which is which?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2003 | 09:07 PM
  #51  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Good post 25. As far as interior noise goes, it is definetly not as loud at cruising speeds as people make it to be imo. I have no problem talking to people or listening to the radio when I am just crusing around.

But If I take it above 3k, then It gets loud inside
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 01:14 AM
  #52  
89ReDIrOcZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: 1989 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7L 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4, Shift Kit
yah thats how my flowmaster is. At crusing speeds its not as loud as i would want it to be. i can harly even hear it inside lol.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #53  
biff85ta's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I have a V-force (flowmaster copy) and at cruising speeds the wind noise is more than the exhaust.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 03:40 AM
  #54  
Matt87GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
The unattractive noise we refer to here is a DRONE people!!!!! Not an all-encompassing assualt on your ears that leaves you feeling violated!!!!

Drone.... Just a drone... And as mentioned above many, many times... it really isn't a big deal at all. Just not something you would purposely design into the system.

And yes, SOME Hooker systems do it too. Been there, heard that. SOME Flowmaster systems also DO NOT do it......
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #55  
FruityOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
The drone from my 80 series muffler is too loud on long drives. I like the sound of the muffler, but over time I find myself turning up the radio just to drown out the noise from the muffler.

Now, when I'm romping on it, I turn the radio off, simply because I love to hear the engine roar.

Course, my neighboors aren't happy that its so loud when I leave for school at 6:30am in the morning.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #56  
Irocster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R-4
I have a spintech muffler and love it...will probably never own another brand...why? Because it works for me. Like said already, for most of us, all these brands will flow pretty much the same, and even if they don't flow the same, not many people will notice a difference. Lets just make life easy on everyone and just say to buy what you think sounds best! There are too many of these muffler fights going on....just get what sounds good to you and be done with it.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #57  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
If you want a REALLY nice MEGA-FLOWING exhaust system that sounds good on the outside, but also produces NO INTERIOR noise, then get a Corsa cat-back for a 4thgen and have a shop put it on your 3rdgen!

Look to spend some bucks though! The Corsa cat-backs are a little pricey~!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #58  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
I chopped out my 30-Series Blowmaster (part of the Force II) and replaced it with a straight through Dynomax UltraFlo welded muffler. The blowmaster sounded excellent ... but the flow rating (cfm) just wasn't there for a high horsepower setup. It was a custom installation because the Muffler I picked is not made for our cars. However, it was -almost- a bolt in. The cool thing about this muffler is that it is quieter than the blowmaster but flows A LOT more. This particular muffler I am talking about from Dynomax is rated at 1500cfm. It's a single 3" in, single 3" out. Look in one side and see out the other. I just went 11.6's @ 117mph with this muffler. Who said 3" exhausts aren't enough for a high hp motor? hehe.

Tim

Last edited by TRAXION; Nov 25, 2003 at 07:51 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #59  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
I can't believe you did that, your car sounded SO good with the Flowmaster. I woulda liked to see times with the Flowmaster then with the new muffler on your current setup.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #60  
Irocster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R-4
I'd like to hear a sound clip of that dynomax. Never heard one. I'm sure it's a lot quieter than the flowmaster, but I'm sure it flows better like you say since it is straight through. And if you're turning 11.5s than you must have a pretty built motor.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #61  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by Irocster
I'd like to hear a sound clip of that dynomax. Never heard one. I'm sure it's a lot quieter than the flowmaster, but I'm sure it flows better like you say since it is straight through. And if you're turning 11.5s than you must have a pretty built motor.
I should have some sound clips withing the week. Built motor? Naaaa. It's just a wimpy stock shortblock. The motor has never been pulled and tranny has never been rebuilt.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #62  
Irocster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R-4
Hell, you're turning those kind of times with a mostly stock set-up? Wow, what's your secret? lol
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 06:18 AM
  #63  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Hell, you're turning those kind of times with a mostly stock set-
up? Wow, what's your secret? lol
The only thing "stock" about Tim's setup is the block, crank, rods, and pistons. Otherwise everythings aftermarket.

Whats impressive is he hasn't beamed a piston to the moon yet.

-- Joe
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 07:11 AM
  #64  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by anesthes
The only thing "stock" about Tim's setup is the block, crank, rods, and pistons. Otherwise everythings aftermarket.

Whats impressive is he hasn't beamed a piston to the moon yet.

-- Joe
Beam me up scotty. Beam me up.

I still have stock bearings, stock oil pump, stock oil pump driveshaft, stock oil pan, stock oil pan gasket, stock distributor .... hmmm ... running out of things here

Irocster - the full report on my run is HERE

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 07:41 AM
  #65  
90formula5spd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 trans am
Engine: 357sbc
Transmission: 700r4
Stock or not, those are impressive times. And in his case, NOT!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #66  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Beam me up scotty. Beam me up.

I still have stock bearings, stock oil pump, stock oil pump driveshaft, stock oil pan, stock oil pan gasket, stock distributor .... hmmm ... running out of things here
I've looked at your setup 100 times and I dunno why I'm not going as fast as you. I think its my sportsman-II heads, and your AFR 190s.


-- Joe

Last edited by anesthes; Nov 21, 2003 at 09:25 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #67  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Joe,

Our setups are actually night and day different ...

1) Stock Sportsman IIs vs. Ported AFRs
2) Tame SLP cam vs. my Lethal EFI Performance Cam
3) TPI intake vs. MiniRam
4) Hedman 1-5/8" shorties vs. Hooker 1-3/4" Long Tubes

You have a supercharger but, IMHO, you are going to have to run a fair amount of boost to make up for my power.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:44 AM
  #68  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by 90formula5spd
Stock or not, those are impressive times. And in his case, NOT!
... but, the shortblock is stock. It's never been out of the car, never rebuilt.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:28 AM
  #69  
anesthes's Avatar
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,089
Likes: 125
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Hey Tim,


Our setups are actually night and day different ...
Yep!

1) Stock Sportsman IIs vs. Ported AFRs
2) Tame SLP cam vs. my Lethal EFI Performance Cam
3) TPI intake vs. MiniRam
4) Hedman 1-5/8" shorties vs. Hooker 1-3/4" Long Tubes
The cam was chosen because of the boost. I'm not sure how much cam changes would make. The Heads for sure are a big difference. I'm flowing like 230/170 cfm.

The TPI I'm not sure about.. You'd think with the boost it wouldn't matter what intake i'm running.. The Miniram surely is better for N/A application.

If I tear this motor down, i'll prolly go with alum heads, and a victor jr efi intake with a carb turndown. Could then run a super chiller to cool stuff down.. wooha!

-- Joe
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 02:31 PM
  #70  
90formula5spd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 trans am
Engine: 357sbc
Transmission: 700r4
Even though your shortblock is stock, which is impressive, The rest is definately not, and im sure it doesn't appear stock either... But good running, you plan on a rebuild any time soon? or is it still running good? When you rebuild you will be upgrading then, won't you?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #71  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
TRAX, what's the original mileage on your car??
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 03:11 PM
  #72  
Matt87GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Originally posted by TRAXION
I chopped out my 30-Series Blowmaster (part of the Force II)
I don't think you had a 30....

Force IIs come with a 40 series 3 chamber muffler that doesn't (according to Flowmaster) flow as well as the 2 chamber 30 series. Plus the 30 series was made specifically for big power applications (NMCA Fastest Streetcar Series).

Unless of course you pieced together your system and put a 30 series on it ....
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #73  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by Matt87GTA
I don't think you had a 30....

Force IIs come with a 40 series
According to flowmaster the thirdgen Force II is the 30 series. Look here ...

PN 17150:
http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cg...ter/17150.html

The muffler in this setup is the 53033. Crossreferencing 53033 on flowmaster's site yields ...
http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cg...ter/53033.html

According to flowmaster the 17150 kit comes with a 30 series.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:04 PM
  #74  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
TRAX, what's the original mileage on your car??
I think I am up to around 34,000 now

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:07 PM
  #75  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by 90formula5spd
Even though your shortblock is stock, which is impressive, The rest is definately not, and im sure it doesn't appear stock either... But good running, you plan on a rebuild any time soon? or is it still running good? When you rebuild you will be upgrading then, won't you?
I never said I was stock. I said 'stock shortblock'. I'm definitely not stock ... no way you can run those times stock - lol. You can't even run those times stock and on nitrous or a supercharger. In any case I have no rebuild planned at this time and I currently don't need one. The leakdown on the cylinders comes out pretty darn good. When it is time to replace the motor I am probably going with a Motown 427ci shortblock.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #76  
90formula5spd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1989 trans am
Engine: 357sbc
Transmission: 700r4
sweet ***!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 01:36 AM
  #77  
Matt87GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Originally posted by TRAXION
PN 17150:
http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cg...ter/17150.html

The muffler in this setup is the 53033. Crossreferencing 53033 on flowmaster's site yields ...
http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cg...ter/53033.html

According to flowmaster the 17150 kit comes with a 30 series.
Well I'll be d*mned.... I was thinking they had 40s on those systems.... My mistake.

Anyways, where did you get flow data for the 3" Flow versus the Dynomax?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 01:42 AM
  #78  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
34,000 miles?!?!

TRAX's car was plenty fast with the Flowmaster!!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 08:28 AM
  #79  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Well I'll be d*mned.... I was thinking they had 40s on those systems.... My mistake.


Anyways, where did you get flow data for the 3" Flow versus the Dynomax?
Honestly Matt - I have none. I looked at the internal design of the 30-Series (which is an excellent muffler) and then it was evident to me that I needed something else. My car is about the combination of parts. I need an exhaust that has great velocity while still flowing a lot. The fact that I am running a 3" gives me my velocity ... but I needed a muffler that would help create this velocity instead of working against it. The Flowmaster has internal baffles (walls) which hurt velocity. Basically, exhaust enters the flowmaster and hits walls. This creates turbulence ... a lot. A straight through muffler won't have this kind of turbulence ... and compliments the 3" by not hurting the velocity. Add to that the fact that the muffler I chose is rated at 1500cfm (common sense dictates that the 53033 Flowmaster can't touch that), and now I have both my velocity and my raw flow.

Tim

Last edited by TRAXION; Nov 25, 2003 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 08:30 AM
  #80  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
34,000 miles?!?!

TRAX's car was plenty fast with the Flowmaster!!
Word. I went 12.2@112 with 1-5/8" shorty headers, flowmaster muffler, stock AFR190s, small 218/224 cam, and a weak 2800 stall. That setup would have probably gone 12.0's but I somehow always get a bug up my butt and want to try something new. I didn't spend enough time with that setup. Well - I can tell ya this - I WILL be spending significant time with my current setup. No more bugs up my butt to change things. I think I am finally happy with the configuration of my 350.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 03:25 PM
  #81  
Matt87GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Makes sense Tim... I guess I never questioned the flow capabilities of the 30 series given the kind of setups it is designed for. That and I personally know of one setup in particular that put 500 RWHP down out of an NA 392 LT1 through a 4" 30 series... It made 606 at the crank and a little over 500 at the wheels (T56, 12 bolt) so it seems the exhaust in the car isn't holding it back any.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 03:36 PM
  #82  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Dynomax UltraFlo Welded straight through 3" in/out on my setup.
http://celligent.com/tim/iroc/movies/dynomax_idle.wmv

The Flowmaster 53033 is a deeper sounding muffler with less midrange. It is a rather loud muffler.

The Dynomax has more midrange with less bass and is more 'hollow'. It is quieter which is surprising given the fact that is straight through (look in one end and see out the other).

IMHO, the flowmaster 53033 is an excellent sounding muffler. At idle is does sound much better with the flowmaster. However, the dynomax is much more comfortable at cruise because it doesn't have that characteristic flowmaster 2000-2500rpm drone.

With that said, I've already had people who have commented on how much they like my new sound. I've been told that it is much more akin to a race type setup since most race cars use straight through designs whereas flowmaster is specifically creating mufflers to produce a particular sound. They particular dynomax I chose was created for pure flow.

Pluses and minuses to both setups. I just know that if I am running a 3" exhaust that I need the highest flowing muffler that I can get my hands on. Bang - for me that's the dynomax ultraflo welded.

Tim

Last edited by TRAXION; Nov 23, 2003 at 07:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #83  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
I really wanna hear/compare the new Dynomax sound to the Flowmaster. Whenever I showed someone that video with your car at idle and the 30 Series, they were like "Wow that sounds good!" And then they were even more surprised when I said that it was the F2 system and NOT the AT, which is the loud system!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:39 AM
  #84  
Timmys88Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
That sounds pretty damn good. Do you have any sounds of the old flowmaster to compare?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 06:44 AM
  #85  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Guys,

I modified my Hooker Long Tube sticky post to include links to BOTH videos ... the 53033 FM 30-Series, and the Dynomax UltraFlo Welded straight through.

It's listed under "Idle sound with full exhaust connected (yummy)."

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...1&pagenumber=1

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #86  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
It's pretty good, but that Flowmaster was great. I wish I coulda heard you rev in the other 2 videos.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #87  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
wow, this thread went from muffler talk to Trax is G()D!! hehehe. Trax, your car is very sweet! I still have some shots of it from TGN.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #88  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
It's pretty good, but that Flowmaster was great. I wish I coulda heard you rev in the other 2 videos.
I agree with you. However, I've also heard the opposite. Some like the new muffler better because it sounds more like a true racecar ... and not like a 'fabricated' sound which is what flowmaster is doing.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #89  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Traxion -

Word. I went 12.2@112 with 1-5/8" shorty headers, flowmaster muffler, stock AFR190s, small 218/224 cam, and a weak 2800 stall. That setup would have probably gone 12.0's but I somehow always get a bug up my butt and want to try something new. I didn't spend enough time with that setup. Well - I can tell ya this - I WILL be spending significant time with my current setup. No more bugs up my butt to change things. I think I am finally happy with the configuration of my 350.
Do you still think my car cant pull at least an 11.9 when your above setup went 12.2's ? Keep in mind that my heads flow better than stock AFR 190's, I have a bigger cam than the above posted, I have more compression, 5 more cubes (big deal ) , I have long-tube headers, and a tranny that loses less to the ground than the power robbing 700r4.

Just a thought!

Also, you have mail.

Mike (1bad91Z)
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:46 PM
  #90  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
Traxion -



Do you still think my car cant pull at least an 11.9 when your above setup went 12.2's ? Keep in mind that my heads flow better than stock AFR 190's, I have a bigger cam than the above posted, I have more compression, 5 more cubes (big deal ) , I have long-tube headers, and a tranny that loses less to the ground than the power robbing 700r4.

Just a thought!

Also, you have mail.

Mike (1bad91Z)
I went 12.2's with the MiniRam ... not a LTR setup. I went 12.5's with a LTR setup. Also - you will note when you read my previous posts to you that I think 11's are possible ... just not probable. I've personally witnessed LTR cars in the 11's with 350ci. My main beef was with 350rwhp on a 350 LTR setup with a normal weight (and not stripped) car.

Again - PLEASE just put the numbers down. $75 is easy enough to come by given 2 months or so. Or, just go to the track and pay $20.

Checking e-mail now ...

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #91  
JERRYWHO's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: So-cal.
Originally posted by TRAXION
I'm definitely not stock ... no way you can run those times stock - lol. You can't even run those times stock and on nitrous or a supercharger.

Tim
I have SLP runners, SLP headers, flowmaster and a Edelbrock base and thats it for motor mods. The 105K old motor has never had the valve covers off and still has the stock 48mm TB on it.

11.614 @ 115.44 with a NOS 5151 plate kit.

I now have the stock base and runners on it (Kevin91Z has the runners on his car.) and will try more nitrous to see if it will run a 11.50 with headers and nitrous only.

Jerry
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #92  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Originally posted by JERRYWHO
I have SLP runners, SLP headers, flowmaster and a Edelbrock base and thats it for motor mods. The 105K old motor has never had the valve covers off and still has the stock 48mm TB on it.

11.614 @ 115.44 with a NOS 5151 plate kit.

I now have the stock base and runners on it (Kevin91Z has the runners on his car.) and will try more nitrous to see if it will run a 11.50 with headers and nitrous only.

Jerry
At first I was cornfused by your comment ... then I looked at your signature ... "210hp of nitrous" ... holy crap dude. And you are going to put more on it? Wowzas.

Tim
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #93  
JERRYWHO's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: So-cal.
Originally posted by TRAXION
At first I was cornfused by your comment ... then I looked at your signature ... "210hp of nitrous" ... holy crap dude. And you are going to put more on it? Wowzas.

Tim
I will try 250 and if that lives than 300 will be next. For backup my new motor ( 6.7L Rodeck ) is on the stand and allmost ready for action.

Jerry
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 10:23 AM
  #94  
Mike91bird's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: currently 305
Transmission: 700R4
Has anyone seen or heard flowmaster's new Super 40's. They just came out with em a little while ago and are supposed to flow quite abit more than the original 40's. Flowmaster has some sound clips(they are about 1.3 megs or so) They sound quite abit deeper and less raspy than the originals http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/cg...r/super40.html

Last edited by Mike91bird; Dec 31, 2003 at 10:28 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulasOnly
TPI
95
Jul 23, 2018 08:47 AM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Oct 9, 2015 09:25 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.