exhaust systems organized by volume
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: MA
Car: 1981 Chevy Malibu, 1987 Formula 350
Engine: 229 V6, L98 TPI 350
Transmission: TH350, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ???, 9 bolt 3.27 posi
exhaust systems organized by volume
Just curious if anyones thought about putting together a chart or something, just "ranking" the different exhaust systems as far as volume at idle and at higher RPM's....I know headers and stuff like that has a big part with that, but if there was a way to just either rank them with or without headers...I know it would be hard to get a bunch of similar cars together at once to do this, and i dont really know of any better way....but its just a thought i had...
:lala:
:lala:
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
There are way to many variables that determine loudness on a motoer excluding headers.
They only true way would be to have a 'control' subject (car) and bolt all the catbacks on to it and then measure with a dB meter.
The easiest way (IMO) to determing lous ranking it the way sound is deadened.
Obviously, a system with bullets/resonators/straight through being loudest, sound cancelling next (ie flowmaster, no dampening material), chambered (ie: hooker{esque}), and standard turbo (ie: dynomax). Just my opinoin though....
They only true way would be to have a 'control' subject (car) and bolt all the catbacks on to it and then measure with a dB meter.
The easiest way (IMO) to determing lous ranking it the way sound is deadened.
Obviously, a system with bullets/resonators/straight through being loudest, sound cancelling next (ie flowmaster, no dampening material), chambered (ie: hooker{esque}), and standard turbo (ie: dynomax). Just my opinoin though....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
Apr 30, 2019 12:14 PM




