***** exhaust
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Car: '84 Z28, '06 Scion tC
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto
***** exhaust
are people in here opposed to putting a japanese exhaust on a camaro?
its just a weird idea that i had.. i was just thinking what would that sound like?
any opinions?
im thinking going towards like megan racing or something like that i mean my camaros not a true dual anyways...
its just a weird idea that i had.. i was just thinking what would that sound like?
any opinions?
im thinking going towards like megan racing or something like that i mean my camaros not a true dual anyways...
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Car: '84 Z28, '06 Scion tC
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto
Re: ***** exhaust
something like this?
i like the look of japanese cars too so i think it might be a good mix.
what do you think itll sound like?
i like the look of japanese cars too so i think it might be a good mix.
what do you think itll sound like?
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis
Car: 1988 GTA Black on Black Hardtop
Engine: 383 miniram/ Ebl
Transmission: 700r4/Performabuilt/3000 Stall
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt / 3.27
Re: ***** exhaust
Well being an exhaust system is designed to fit a certain vehicle i would stick to a system that fits. Unless you would like to fab hangers bend pipe and be a pita.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Shawano, WI
Car: 1986 Camaro
Engine: 350-Carb
Transmission: 700-R4
Re: ***** exhaust
I think you would have a lot less hassles and less money just buying a cat-back system that was designed for ur camaro, just my opinion.
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: n/a
Transmission: n/a
Axle/Gears: 3.27, I think
Re: ***** exhaust
Go for it. Make sure you get a sound clip or a video of it after you put it on.
I always wondered what it would sound like, but I still haven't seen one.
I always wondered what it would sound like, but I still haven't seen one.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Car: '84 Z28, '06 Scion tC
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto
Re: ***** exhaust
well this is going to be the first time im working on a car and my starter issue has drug me into alot of places i didnt think it would take me. and i had to get into exhaust to resolve the issue too. and the thought came in my head. im in an auto tech class too and were getting grades for customizing cars and what not so why not right?
Trending Topics
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: ***** exhaust
I've seen the stock, dual tipped exhaust built with mufflers like that, here on TGO,so it wouldn't be the first time. Just never heard how it sounded.
But I think it was built with "V8 style bullet" mufflers made for dual exhaust & not just using 2 4-cyl r i c e r mufflers.
But I think it was built with "V8 style bullet" mufflers made for dual exhaust & not just using 2 4-cyl r i c e r mufflers.
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: ***** exhaust
I wasn't referring to duals. The stock single pipe splits into 2 outlets at the rear. That is where they put the 2 mufflers at.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: Fallston, Maryland
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3.70
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: San Jose CA
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: ***** exhaust
Maybe look at something made for a Supra. They are about the same length as an fbody, and put down 4th gen power so they probably flow pretty well.
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: ***** exhaust
I don't think you get what I mean.....
INSTEAD of the muffler even being there, use that area as the splitting point, then put dul mufflers AFTER that.
Like my rear section is. I just have a single bullet muffler before the rear axle.
INSTEAD of the muffler even being there, use that area as the splitting point, then put dul mufflers AFTER that.
Like my rear section is. I just have a single bullet muffler before the rear axle.
Last edited by Stephen; Dec 8, 2009 at 08:55 PM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Car: '84 Z28, '06 Scion tC
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto
Re: ***** exhaust
ok... i see. sorry.
ill have to do some thinking on it. i dont have money RIGHT NOW anyways. but i was just thinking go single because itll be cheaper
ill have to do some thinking on it. i dont have money RIGHT NOW anyways. but i was just thinking go single because itll be cheaper
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Greater D.C. area.
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3 TBI
Transmission: 700R4 => WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open Diff
Re: ***** exhaust
I put a japanese muffler on my saab. It was loud and didn't sounds very good, kinda raspy. Swapped it for a magnaflow and it's much quieter and smoother sounding.
Do what you want, it's your car.
Do what you want, it's your car.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Car: '84 Z28, '06 Scion tC
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto
Re: ***** exhaust
well im going to end up doing what i want. just like anyone else would. but im just trying to get opinions about it and how to go about doing it. single, dual... what manufacturer to go with im just not sure...
the ones ive seen and seem to like are made by megan, injen, and greddy... ill have to check different things out
the ones ive seen and seem to like are made by megan, injen, and greddy... ill have to check different things out
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: ***** exhaust
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
Re: ***** exhaust
WTF are you talking about vipers and tips for?
I was talking about aftermarket mufflers/systems that every honda civic owns that this kid wants to stick on a real car.

I was talking about aftermarket mufflers/systems that every honda civic owns that this kid wants to stick on a real car.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: ***** exhaust
i think the "r!cer" exhausts your talking about are going to be too small in diameter for your V8, you need at least a 3" single really for these cars, 2.5" might be ok, but not if you want to make any real power
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 10
From: South Carolina
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: ***** exhaust
Then save your money and buy a real exhaust. I agree that our cars need at least 3 inch single, I think most of the r i c e r pipes are 2 inches.
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: ***** exhaust
Easy.....You said ricers have mufflers with tip. Since Vipers have mufflers with tip, they must fall in to your description.
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: ***** exhaust
Anyway, to the OP. If the car is a huge POS whatever, You will be just adding to a horrible stigma and sterotype these cars have, and one that alot of members on here are trying to obsolve by building and restoring proper Thirdgens. If its a decent car. Dont mess it up with some J/A honda type exhaust system. Its just stupid. and any motorhead/car guy with half a brain will say the same when they see you driving around in it. All IMO of course.
Last edited by NY3RDGEN; Dec 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: titusville FL
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: tbi 305
Transmission: 5 speed
Re: ***** exhaust
It will probably sound close to a glasspack thats essentially all those jdm type mufflers really are. look into companies like hks , apex. Aside from the hole ri*e thing i think that visually that style muffler just won't fit well enough to look good. just my 2 cents
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: ***** exhaust
a propper muffler would sound better and last much longer, or just straightpipe it with a pair of long 3.5" diameter tips.. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/STAIN...Q5fAccessories
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 20
From: Boston, MA
Car: 1983 Pontiac Trans Am Daytona 500
Engine: Crossfire 305ci V8
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 4 speed Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip/posi
Re: ***** exhaust
any udates on your project?
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton FL
Car: CAMARO,GMC SUBURBAN DUALLY,RACEBOA
Engine: 305 TBI( soon 383),350Vortec
Transmission: 700 turbo
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Temple City, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: V8 305 TBI
Transmission: W/C T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: ***** exhaust
Well what you have to understand is that what gives those cars their distinct sound is the fact that they're 4 cylinder cars.
Your car is a v8 correct? So at idle your motor will be spinning at ~800 rpm, so you are firing 400 times a minute, divided by 8 cylinders firing each time. So each cylinder fires 50 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing it to 0.8 fires each second, almost one cylinder fire each second.
Opposed to 400 times a minute divided by 4 cylinders, with each cylinder firing at 100 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing to 1.6 fires per second.
So what I am getting at is that due to the lower rate of fire in our V8 powered cars, we cannot really attain the same "fart can" sound that those cars are so famous for.
In my opinion, I think it would just sound raspy, like the other posters say, like a glasspack.
Anyone feel free to correct me if they feel I'm in any way incorrect.
Your car is a v8 correct? So at idle your motor will be spinning at ~800 rpm, so you are firing 400 times a minute, divided by 8 cylinders firing each time. So each cylinder fires 50 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing it to 0.8 fires each second, almost one cylinder fire each second.
Opposed to 400 times a minute divided by 4 cylinders, with each cylinder firing at 100 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing to 1.6 fires per second.
So what I am getting at is that due to the lower rate of fire in our V8 powered cars, we cannot really attain the same "fart can" sound that those cars are so famous for.
In my opinion, I think it would just sound raspy, like the other posters say, like a glasspack.
Anyone feel free to correct me if they feel I'm in any way incorrect.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Re: ***** exhaust
Well what you have to understand is that what gives those cars their distinct sound is the fact that they're 4 cylinder cars.
Your car is a v8 correct? So at idle your motor will be spinning at ~800 rpm, so you are firing 400 times a minute, divided by 8 cylinders firing each time. So each cylinder fires 50 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing it to 0.8 fires each second, almost one cylinder fire each second.
Opposed to 400 times a minute divided by 4 cylinders, with each cylinder firing at 100 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing to 1.6 fires per second.
So what I am getting at is that due to the lower rate of fire in our V8 powered cars, we cannot really attain the same "fart can" sound that those cars are so famous for.
In my opinion, I think it would just sound raspy, like the other posters say, like a glasspack.
Anyone feel free to correct me if they feel I'm in any way incorrect.
Your car is a v8 correct? So at idle your motor will be spinning at ~800 rpm, so you are firing 400 times a minute, divided by 8 cylinders firing each time. So each cylinder fires 50 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing it to 0.8 fires each second, almost one cylinder fire each second.
Opposed to 400 times a minute divided by 4 cylinders, with each cylinder firing at 100 times a minute, divided by 60, reducing to 1.6 fires per second.
So what I am getting at is that due to the lower rate of fire in our V8 powered cars, we cannot really attain the same "fart can" sound that those cars are so famous for.
In my opinion, I think it would just sound raspy, like the other posters say, like a glasspack.
Anyone feel free to correct me if they feel I'm in any way incorrect.
Last edited by 2002chad; Jan 26, 2010 at 01:53 AM. Reason: To shocked to think straight.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: minneapolis
Car: 1988 GTA Black on Black Hardtop
Engine: 383 miniram/ Ebl
Transmission: 700r4/Performabuilt/3000 Stall
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt / 3.27
Re: ***** exhaust
Started 12-8-09. Over a month long. WHY ?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Temple City, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: V8 305 TBI
Transmission: W/C T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: ***** exhaust
WOW, your understanding of an internal combustion engine is all jacked up. I'm no brain scientist but how can the 4cil have twice as many combustions per minute as a v8 at the same rpm? Does that mean i can pull four sparkplug wires and start having twice as many combustions per minute?
You have to understand that the RPM does not reflect the amount of times a cylinder fires per minute. RPM is each revolution of the crank.
In an internal combustion engine there is only one stroke of a four stroke cycle that creates power, if there was no flywheel on the engine (to balance the difference between power and intake/compression/and exhaust strokes) the single power stroke would not be sufficient to spin the crank efficiently.
As a result we just added more cylinders to do all that work, multiple times over.
So with the understanding of that I'll move on. A V8 needs less firings of it's cylinders to spin the crankshaft the same number of times as a 4 cylinder engine. Understand? In order to spin the engine at 800 RPM a V8 is not firing it's cylinders as many times as a 4 cylinder engine.
I believe somewhere around V12 engines is where engines have almost 360 degrees of power stroke rotation.
Do you understand what I was saying?
Now we get into torque vs horsepower. Because V8 has twice as many cylinders firing, it gets the engine spinning much quicker than a 4 cylinder engine, which is why V8's have so much torque.
Now on the opposite side, this big and heavy V8 has so much rotational mass that it does not safely spin at such high RPM's as a 4 cylinder engine, which is why 4 cylinder engines make their horse power in high RPM's.
Hopefully this helps.
Last edited by kkingsrulee; Jan 26, 2010 at 06:58 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Re: ***** exhaust
I stand by my origional statement. You have no idea what you are talking about. The number of cylinders doesn't matter. Each one fires the same number of times at a given rpm. Doesn't matter if it has 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 or even 543.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Temple City, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: V8 305 TBI
Transmission: W/C T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: ***** exhaust
That's one of the most ignorant auto-related things I've ever heard.
Take a couple of auto classes and come back.
Take a couple of auto classes and come back.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Temple City, CA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: V8 305 TBI
Transmission: W/C T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: ***** exhaust
So, if according to you, every engine fires each cylinder the same amount of times at each RPM why is it that you can sit there at idle in a V8 and count the cylinder fires?
Good luck trying to do that at idle in a four banger.
Good luck trying to do that at idle in a four banger.
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 10
From: South Carolina
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: ***** exhaust
there's alot more to exhaust sound than just number of cylinders and mufflers, displacement and volumetric efficiency play a huge role in tone and sound. there's also things to consider, like the firing order headers or manifolds, primary and exhaust size, primary and exhaust length, do I even have to bring up idle rpm?
a 4 cylinder and a V8 of similar cylinder volume and volumetric efficiency, Idling at the exact same rpm, the V8 will have a smoother Idle, because it has powerstrokes every 90* of crank rotation, where as a 4 cylinder has a powerstroke every 180*.
a 4 cylinder and a V8 of similar cylinder volume and volumetric efficiency, Idling at the exact same rpm, the V8 will have a smoother Idle, because it has powerstrokes every 90* of crank rotation, where as a 4 cylinder has a powerstroke every 180*.
Supreme Member

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 10
From: South Carolina
Car: 85 2M6, 87 'Bird 88 'burb
Engine: LX9, LG4, L05
Transmission: F23, 700r4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.63, 2.73, 4.10
Re: ***** exhaust
and, as I said before, save your money anddo it right once, If you can't afford to do it right the first time, can you afford to do it again?
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
Re: ***** exhaust
If you think you can count how many times a cylinder fires... Then that's another WOW.
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton FL
Car: CAMARO,GMC SUBURBAN DUALLY,RACEBOA
Engine: 305 TBI( soon 383),350Vortec
Transmission: 700 turbo
Re: ***** exhaust
We are both talking about four stroke engines correct? In a four stroke engine the plug fires once every four strokes, since there is two strokes to every one revolution of the crankshaft then the cylinder combusts one time for every two revolutions of the crank. No matter how many cylinders the engine has, this one always repeats this same action. If it didn't then it wouldn't be a four stroke. I don't know how i can make it any more simple than that.
If you think you can count how many times a cylinder fires... Then that's another WOW.
If you think you can count how many times a cylinder fires... Then that's another WOW.

AND WOW !!!!!



Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton FL
Car: CAMARO,GMC SUBURBAN DUALLY,RACEBOA
Engine: 305 TBI( soon 383),350Vortec
Transmission: 700 turbo
Re: ***** exhaust
No, all that would do is create more time between combustions.
You have to understand that the RPM does not reflect the amount of times a cylinder fires per minute. RPM is each revolution of the crank.
In an internal combustion engine there is only one stroke of a four stroke cycle that creates power, if there was no flywheel on the engine (to balance the difference between power and intake/compression/and exhaust strokes) the single power stroke would not be sufficient to spin the crank efficiently.
As a result we just added more cylinders to do all that work, multiple times over.
So with the understanding of that I'll move on. A V8 needs less firings of it's cylinders to spin the crankshaft the same number of times as a 4 cylinder engine. Understand? In order to spin the engine at 800 RPM a V8 is not firing it's cylinders as many times as a 4 cylinder engine.
I believe somewhere around V12 engines is where engines have almost 360 degrees of power stroke rotation.
Do you understand what I was saying?
Now we get into torque vs horsepower. Because V8 has twice as many cylinders firing, it gets the engine spinning much quicker than a 4 cylinder engine, which is why V8's have so much torque.
Now on the opposite side, this big and heavy V8 has so much rotational mass that it does not safely spin at such high RPM's as a 4 cylinder engine, which is why 4 cylinder engines make their horse power in high RPM's.
Hopefully this helps.
You have to understand that the RPM does not reflect the amount of times a cylinder fires per minute. RPM is each revolution of the crank.
In an internal combustion engine there is only one stroke of a four stroke cycle that creates power, if there was no flywheel on the engine (to balance the difference between power and intake/compression/and exhaust strokes) the single power stroke would not be sufficient to spin the crank efficiently.
As a result we just added more cylinders to do all that work, multiple times over.
So with the understanding of that I'll move on. A V8 needs less firings of it's cylinders to spin the crankshaft the same number of times as a 4 cylinder engine. Understand? In order to spin the engine at 800 RPM a V8 is not firing it's cylinders as many times as a 4 cylinder engine.
I believe somewhere around V12 engines is where engines have almost 360 degrees of power stroke rotation.
Do you understand what I was saying?
Now we get into torque vs horsepower. Because V8 has twice as many cylinders firing, it gets the engine spinning much quicker than a 4 cylinder engine, which is why V8's have so much torque.
Now on the opposite side, this big and heavy V8 has so much rotational mass that it does not safely spin at such high RPM's as a 4 cylinder engine, which is why 4 cylinder engines make their horse power in high RPM's.
Hopefully this helps.

Tourge is made because of CI and not on how many cylinders u have, also a 4 cylinder revs up faster then a V8 because of less weight on the internals...think about it for a minute before u say anything !!!!!!
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Car: '87 Z-28
Engine: LT1-topped 400
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: ***** exhaust
Fail. A four-stroke engine fires one time, per cylinder, per two revolutions. So a single cylinder engine at 600rpm fires 300 times per minute. Divide 300 ignitions in a minute by 60 seconds per minute and you get 5 times per second. Multiply that by eight cylinders and you get 40 total ignition events per second. At 600 rpm idle. The "lumpy" sound that's almost slow enough to count is one cylinder making a bit more noise on the exhaust cycle than the other seven. Four cylinder engines typically run smoother and quieter, and idle faster.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: ***** exhaust
Fail. A four-stroke engine fires one time, per cylinder, per two revolutions. So a single cylinder engine at 600rpm fires 300 times per minute. Divide 300 ignitions in a minute by 60 seconds per minute and you get 5 times per second. Multiply that by eight cylinders and you get 40 total ignition events per second. At 600 rpm idle. The "lumpy" sound that's almost slow enough to count is one cylinder making a bit more noise on the exhaust cycle than the other seven. Four cylinder engines typically run smoother and quieter, and idle faster.
This isn't for you el_muerte.
A v8 has more IGNITION events per engine rotation plain and simple all cylinders HAVE to fire every other time it comes to TDC which is every 720*s. A v8 will have TWICE as many ignition events at a given rpm as compared to the 4cyl.
I can explain it to you but I can not understand it for you.
Last edited by stroker_SS; Jan 29, 2010 at 09:34 PM.
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton FL
Car: CAMARO,GMC SUBURBAN DUALLY,RACEBOA
Engine: 305 TBI( soon 383),350Vortec
Transmission: 700 turbo





