WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: I'm on the central coast of California
Car: Now, 83 Z-28
Engine: H.O.5.0
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Dam low!
WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
It's standard practice to run a crossover for improved performance, doesn't a cat do the same--if big enough??
I guess the cat back 'dulies' are just for looks
Straighten me out!
I guess the cat back 'dulies' are just for looks
Straighten me out!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
From: Glen Park, NY
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS II Supercharged w/Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond 12 Bolt
Re: WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
I have never been a fan of Cat's.. Pending on your setup. I completely removed it.. Plus, I am running a 4" exhaust and unless I want to run a truck convertor which won't fit under the car, It was just easier to remove it.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: I'm on the central coast of California
Car: Now, 83 Z-28
Engine: H.O.5.0
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Dam low!
Re: WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
TRUE, but I ned to pass Calif SMOG.
Seems I've seen serious V8 race cars running 8>2>1 exhausts
Seems I've seen serious V8 race cars running 8>2>1 exhausts
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: I'm on the central coast of California
Car: Now, 83 Z-28
Engine: H.O.5.0
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Dam low!
Re: WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
---so I'll run two 1" pipes instead of one 3.5" one, does thaat work in MN??--it doesn't here in Ca.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 5
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
a pair of 2.5" pipes will flow more air than a single 3" pipe- if you have something that needs more flow than a 3" pipe can support.. GN guys claim to see a noticeable differences in spool up and trap speeds between dual 2.5" pipes and dual 3" pipes after a single 3" cat, but that could also just be them subconsciously justifying that $500 exhaust system they just bought..
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: I'm on the central coast of California
Car: Now, 83 Z-28
Engine: H.O.5.0
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Dam low!
Re: WHY is a 2>1(cat)>2 cat back not as good as--
Haven't I seen big money race cars using a final single pipe? As I recall Kastner the British Triumph guru used a 6>2>1 system in his internatioonal champion cars.
I'll try and get an answer from Dr. Dave Vizard who has several books about how to get the big HP from engines. He also dragraces etc.
Changes to the exhaust historically have much less effect than the input end having to deal with only the 14.7 PSI pressure pushing air/fuel in as opposed to the hundreds of pounds shoving the exhaust out.
Somewhere there will a comparison about such things.
I'll try and get an answer from Dr. Dave Vizard who has several books about how to get the big HP from engines. He also dragraces etc.
Changes to the exhaust historically have much less effect than the input end having to deal with only the 14.7 PSI pressure pushing air/fuel in as opposed to the hundreds of pounds shoving the exhaust out.
Somewhere there will a comparison about such things.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




