Fabrication Custom fabrication ideas and concepts ranging from body kits, interior work, driveline tech, and much more.

STB fabed up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
fitbmxseries1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: fond du lac, WI
Car: 1988 trans am GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
STB fabed up

was bored and found some extra metal laying around so i went at it!

i have 3 bolts holding it in on each end, right now its only primered not sure what color to paint it yet
Attached Thumbnails STB fabed up-p1010193.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #2  
johnnyboy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: western ny
Car: '82 formula clone, 95 saab 900se
Engine: 350 vortec'd tbi, 2.0L turbo
Transmission: 700r4, 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 2.77 open
that's pretty nifty, but aren't they usually connected directly to the strut tower?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
Xophertony's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
with our cars it does not need to be connected directly to the top of the strut, as the entire sheet metal "strut tower" is what flexes. most bars attach just like his.

looks good man, does that smaller rear bit actualy contact the engine?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
fitbmxseries1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: fond du lac, WI
Car: 1988 trans am GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
delete this post it accidentaly double posted.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #5  
fitbmxseries1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: fond du lac, WI
Car: 1988 trans am GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
its not making any contact with the engine it is very close though! on the rear peice its not square tubing its smaller c-channel for some extra clearance. im not even sure if that part even helps with strenght though. and ive heard its bad to connect it directly to the struts, not sure why though.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #6  
JeremyNYR's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
Originally Posted by fitbmxseries1
and ive heard its bad to connect it directly to the struts, not sure why though.

The reason that comes to my mind is that the brace could force the strut out of position and ruin the alignment. It looks good, but the pictures make it look really close and I wonder if there is sufficient room for the motor to torque without hitting it.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
fitbmxseries1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 1
From: fond du lac, WI
Car: 1988 trans am GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
ive pushed the car to its limits for the past few days and removed it, ive checked for any signs of touching and the only thing i see is that it was touching the hood, but im gunna keep an eye on it make sure it doesnt hit. aperntly only have an inch or so between the hood and the engine so i had to make it a bit tight.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
87iroctheo
Exhaust
18
Dec 4, 2016 11:47 AM
Biochem
Aftermarket Product Review
9
Jul 6, 2001 11:10 PM
Stell1579
Aftermarket Product Review
10
Feb 1, 2001 10:47 AM
Joe's-88
Aftermarket Product Review
2
Nov 26, 2000 09:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.