Check out this post. Something just doesnt seem to add up about all that he says, options that he lists, then the way the car looks. Maybe Im wrong, thats why Im asking the expertshttps://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthread.php?s=&postid=761357#post761357

pretty much all my issues that dont make sense are in the post, also after looking at the pictures the Iroc logos look to be possitioned wrong, and they are grey and the RPO says red. I just want to know for sure if its all correct before I bother driving to look at it.

 

Based on what I read, the last post questioned the rims and ground effects. This person obviously knows nothing about IROC's. The rims he has on the car are correct for a 1990 IROC. The ground effects in question were on the 91-92 Camaros. There were no 91 IROC's!!!!

Second, the L98 350 motor was an option. His motor is correct for that car based on the RPO LB9. The color of the IROC-Z badge and emblems should be red based on the decoder, but he did say it was just repainted. If he opted for the silver IROC-Z, he probably swapped the emblems for a match. Either way, these are easily changed back. The dash emblem is yellow which is also indicative of the 90 (I think it should say IROC-Z in yellow though). The only problem I see with the 81A RPO, it states a red stripe which would have given a red IROC-Z badge and then would have (I think) the red interior, however everything else in his RPO's matches what he has. I would think that the 81A is either a typo or could be incorrect on this car.

I don't understand your comment about the car being a real IROC, but not a real Z28. That makes no sense, since the IROC is a package on top of the Z28. You can't have an IROC without first having the Z.

This car looks legit.