Frame question
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: New York State
Car: 1984 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L V6 2BBL (yeah I know...)
Transmission: 700R4 automatic
Frame question
Somebody inisted to me that 4-cyl, 6-cyl, and 8-cyl Camaro's all have different fame thicknesses. I didn't agree on the thickness of the frame metal, but he kept on insisting. Is he right, or am I?
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 349
Likes: 1
From: CO
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 4L60E
I think...
I'm not sure, however one would think they are all the same because why would GM have different frames for one car. It woldn't make sense from a business or practical point of view. just my opionion
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: under the hood
Car: 92 Z28 heritage
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5
The frame rail thickness is the same for 4, 6, and 8 cyl cars. It is very thin, but the same none the less. I had the misforture of cutting up two thirdgens. One was a 5.7L IROC and the other a 3.1 RS. Both had the same frame rails. Besides, there is only one GM part number for each rail on each side.
Don't forget, we are talking about General Motors here. They have been using the same steering column in ALL their cars since 1963! (practically). They practically invented the concept of using one part in 10 different applications. Why in the world would they make three different chassis' for one car? C'mon.
Don't forget, we are talking about General Motors here. They have been using the same steering column in ALL their cars since 1963! (practically). They practically invented the concept of using one part in 10 different applications. Why in the world would they make three different chassis' for one car? C'mon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




I was referring to the front subframe, should have specified.
