History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

1982 Trans Am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #1  
Disco Man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Washington, D.C. metropolitian area
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LU5 - Cross-Fire
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 2.93
1982 Trans Am




1982 Pontiac Trans Am – the Suave Aerodynamic Warrior:


http://www.oldcarmemories.com/content/view/49/1/
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
TOM-1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 1LE
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: G92 Perf. Axle
Re: 1982 Trans Am

That is one of the better articles on the early Third-Gens I have read.

My favorite quote, that I couldn't agree with more:

The real testament to the 1982 Trans Am is the fact that even almost thirty years after its introduction it looks more modern and aerodynamic than the current field of new rear-wheel drive muscle cars. It was indeed a car well ahead of its time – a suave aerodynamic warrior.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #3  
flippermtc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 3
From: King of Prussia Pa
Car: 88 IROC T-Top
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: 1982 Trans Am

It is a shame that Pontiac wasn't allowed to put the 4.9 turbo in the new T/A. If that motor had been able to hold on until the fuel injection systems came on line it would have been neat. Chevrolet couldn't let the mighty Corvette take a back seat. The 80-81 editions were eating vettes at the time and the new 82's would have done the same.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
okfoz's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,298
Likes: 197
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1982 Trans Am

In so many ways the Firebird and Camaro were really ahead of thier time in 1982, As technology progressed so did the cars, these cars were more sophisticated than anything made before them. They are really overlooked but I see a definate intrest peaking in collectors...

John
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2010 | 11:48 PM
  #5  
92RS(real slow)'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,151
Likes: 0
From: Osceola Indiana
Car: 92 RS(sold) 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ones that turn
Re: 1982 Trans Am

that was a good article it is hard to believe that our cars where so ahead of there time when they were new
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2010 | 03:52 AM
  #6  
Bowtiebruiser's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Car: 1982 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 350 4bbl
Transmission: Borg Warner Super T-10
Axle/Gears: Richmond 10 bolt 4:10 Posi
Re: 1982 Trans Am

Look at it this way, is the forth gen suspension that much different than ours? No not really. And even look at the Fifth Gen, with the exception of IRS it's still pretty close. Our cars definitly made a huge though subtle impact on performance cars. And by subtle i mean most people dont think of the torque arm suspensions origins
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hawk312
Firebirds for Sale
36
Aug 22, 2017 08:55 PM
louishenry
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
0
Aug 28, 2015 09:41 AM
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM
firebirdchick28
Mid-West Region
0
Aug 16, 2015 02:52 PM
Leggman1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Aug 6, 2015 04:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.