Post Pictures from back in the day.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,228
Likes: 1,156
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Me and my 89 formula 350 at a friends house back in the day..
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
puma: You are dating yourself! I remember the same, Autotrader was delivered to my local corner store every Friday afternoon. And it was regionalized, so you could only search cars that were close. The only way to find a more exotic car from a far away land was to buy a differnent paper, like Old Autos or Hemmings.
Ahhh the good old days. When information was acquired in blocks of a week or a month.
Ahhh the good old days. When information was acquired in blocks of a week or a month.
Pre that was the LA Times or Daily news..... You paid by the word so there wasn't all the hype....
I can still remember a Corvette, a 66 I think it was, one owner with low miles in the LA Times for like 8K... it sounded so nice but I just didn't have that much to spend..... I ended up buying a 65 Roadster for 4,500 ( probably all the money I had or could raise ) with 4 speed, 300hp, maroon with saddle interior and a luggage rack..... I didn't even have a garage
and my rental house/ shack was about as big as a garage. Good times....
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,840
Likes: 921
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
This 1992 Camaro was my first new car, bought from Hamilton Chevrolet in Warren, Michigan. It's pictured here at the GM Tech Center in Warren, in front of the Chevrolet Central office building, with the sign recently re-christened World Headquarters.

It was a pretty plain car. L03, 5 spd., with the 16 wheels, rear window defog, a/c, casstte, and that was about it. I loved that car.

It was a pretty plain car. L03, 5 spd., with the 16 wheels, rear window defog, a/c, casstte, and that was about it. I loved that car.
Last edited by DynoDave43; Apr 30, 2014 at 10:22 PM.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Me with an '87 Dk. Blue/Gold Z28. March 1987. I really liked this car and no I did not buy it.
Supreme Member




Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 48
From: Dallas
Car: 1991 Trans Am Vert
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 baby
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 7
From: MA, USA
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 644
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 7
From: MA, USA
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Weird. Might be for wheel strap reasons? Don't think they'd be worried about them falling off in transport as they don't come off driving! haha
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
They disappeared from dealer lots, so they were put in the car to be installed at the time of sale. It had nothing to do with falling off in shipment. However, in 1982, the first design was very weak and they would fall off when driving. They had little tabs that would crack if installed incorrectly. When I bought my '83, the dealer offered me a second set for a discount knowing that I would need them. And I did!
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 4
From: Mountain Maryland
Car: 89 RS Vert, 89 Formula, 89 Bird
Engine: L03, TBI 350, none
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4, none
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.45, none
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
They disappeared from dealer lots, so they were put in the car to be installed at the time of sale. It had nothing to do with falling off in shipment. However, in 1982, the first design was very weak and they would fall off when driving. They had little tabs that would crack if installed incorrectly. When I bought my '83, the dealer offered me a second set for a discount knowing that I would need them. And I did!
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
The early rims had these holes also, and those were what broke. They also had a metal tab that would lock onto the center of the rim, but they weren't very strong. The later years used a stronger spring steel clip that held better. Many dealers even put glue on the plastic tabs to keep them on.
Actually, David M do you remember if the early center caps had a plastic clip that held onto the rim center? I just remember that they could go flying off like a hubcap while driving.
Actually, David M do you remember if the early center caps had a plastic clip that held onto the rim center? I just remember that they could go flying off like a hubcap while driving.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
No Scott I'm sorry I don't remember that. I became "hands on" with third-gens starting in 1988 when I started working at GM dealerships. So the most current design with the strong metal tangs is the only one I'm familiar with.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Along with the front ground effect, and the lower air deflector. Look how far forward these cars are parked against the curb. The lower air deflectors can't be installed or they'd be torn off.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 811
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
My 91z28 and 87GTA. Wish i had an old pic of my 87Formula and my 82 z28 pace car
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
A load of '87 Firebirds and Camaros being delivered to Hardy Chevrolet Dallas, GA. Sept. 1986.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 613
Likes: 5
From: Michigan
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MD8
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
David M those pics are great. Nothing like seeing pics of new F bodies on the dealer lots. I always wonder the fate of all those cars.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
I have more pics, I just have to get them scanned and posted.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Thank's for the pic's David, their great. Glad you had the vision to take them. The carrier pic is really nice.. it's something we've all seen in person, but not in pictures very often.
Please post more.....
Please post more.....
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 871
Likes: 4
From: Yreka, in the State of Jefferson
Car: 1991 red Z/28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
I always enjoy David M's pictures. He sent me a bunch and I still enjoy looking at them.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
'84 H.O. Z28 fresh off the truck. Berglund Chevrolet Roanoake, VA Feb. 1984. Photo courtesy Sinks Chevrolet collection.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Stills from '80's Chevrolet TV commercial. March 1987.
Last edited by David M; Jul 6, 2014 at 10:27 PM.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 101
From: Spokane WA
Car: 92 Lingenfelter Z28 articwhite
Engine: Aluminum 615BBC
Transmission: Th400wbrake/curri entps9" locker
Axle/Gears: 4.11/4.30/4.56
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
look at the pic in post #55...ouch!!
Last edited by articwhiteZ; Jun 22, 2014 at 02:21 PM.
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 710
Likes: 32
From: pensacola florida
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Really cool to see these cars fresh out of the factory on the dealer lot. Thanks for the photos David
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 613
Likes: 5
From: Michigan
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MD8
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Supreme Member




Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 48
From: Dallas
Car: 1991 Trans Am Vert
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 baby
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
also I was a lot boy back then for a chevy dealer.... never scarfed one.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 613
Likes: 5
From: Michigan
Car: 1985 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: MD8
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 710
Likes: 32
From: pensacola florida
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Where the cars in the 1st pic 86's? I see the high mount hatch brake light on at least 2 of them.
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,840
Likes: 921
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
I would contend that the answer is not that simple. I too worked at a Chevrolet dealership "back in the day".
This spoiler would have been installed at PDI (Pre-Delivery Inspection). This was a specific process that Chevrolet (or Pontiac) would pay for. It was submitted to GM just like any other warranty repair, and is usually the first item to appear in the warranty history.
But when it was done was not regulated. At our store, which was fairly high volume, we had a full time employee (Lonnie) who did nothing but PDI. If he found a true defect outside of the scope of PDI, or if a defect was spotted during new vehicle check-in( receiving it off the truck), a ticket was written to send it to a line technician for warranty repair.
But during a busy selling season, with lots of sales, and lots of new cars coming in, Lonnie could not keep up.
So, off the truck (I did vehicle check-in...off-the-truck defect inspection), they would go straight onto the lot. It might be the back lot to await PDI, it might be the front lot when we had a "full house". As Lonnie needed work, units were brought to him and prepped. So some cars on the lot had been through PDI, some had not.
When things were busy up front (high sales) but slow in back (little service work), and when Lonnie could not keep up, if there were cars that still needed PDI, line techs would be assigned those cars, just to keep them busy flagging time.
So I think dealer policy, practice and volume probably had a lot to do with this. Thus you are seeing photos of some that have been PDI'd, and some that have not.
This spoiler would have been installed at PDI (Pre-Delivery Inspection). This was a specific process that Chevrolet (or Pontiac) would pay for. It was submitted to GM just like any other warranty repair, and is usually the first item to appear in the warranty history.
But when it was done was not regulated. At our store, which was fairly high volume, we had a full time employee (Lonnie) who did nothing but PDI. If he found a true defect outside of the scope of PDI, or if a defect was spotted during new vehicle check-in( receiving it off the truck), a ticket was written to send it to a line technician for warranty repair.
But during a busy selling season, with lots of sales, and lots of new cars coming in, Lonnie could not keep up.
So, off the truck (I did vehicle check-in...off-the-truck defect inspection), they would go straight onto the lot. It might be the back lot to await PDI, it might be the front lot when we had a "full house". As Lonnie needed work, units were brought to him and prepped. So some cars on the lot had been through PDI, some had not.
When things were busy up front (high sales) but slow in back (little service work), and when Lonnie could not keep up, if there were cars that still needed PDI, line techs would be assigned those cars, just to keep them busy flagging time.
So I think dealer policy, practice and volume probably had a lot to do with this. Thus you are seeing photos of some that have been PDI'd, and some that have not.
Supreme Member




Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 48
From: Dallas
Car: 1991 Trans Am Vert
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 baby
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
I would contend that the answer is not that simple. I too worked at a Chevrolet dealership "back in the day".
This spoiler would have been installed at PDI (Pre-Delivery Inspection). This was a specific process that Chevrolet (or Pontiac) would pay for. It was submitted to GM just like any other warranty repair, and is usually the first item to appear in the warranty history.
But when it was done was not regulated. At our store, which was fairly high volume, we had a full time employee (Lonnie) who did nothing but PDI. If he found a true defect outside of the scope of PDI, or if a defect was spotted during new vehicle check-in( receiving it off the truck), a ticket was written to send it to a line technician for warranty repair.
But during a busy selling season, with lots of sales, and lots of new cars coming in, Lonnie could not keep up.
So, off the truck (I did vehicle check-in...off-the-truck defect inspection), they would go straight onto the lot. It might be the back lot to await PDI, it might be the front lot when we had a "full house". As Lonnie needed work, units were brought to him and prepped. So some cars on the lot had been through PDI, some had not.
When things were busy up front (high sales) but slow in back (little service work), and when Lonnie could not keep up, if there were cars that still needed PDI, line techs would be assigned those cars, just to keep them busy flagging time.
So I think dealer policy, practice and volume probably had a lot to do with this. Thus you are seeing photos of some that have been PDI'd, and some that have not.
This spoiler would have been installed at PDI (Pre-Delivery Inspection). This was a specific process that Chevrolet (or Pontiac) would pay for. It was submitted to GM just like any other warranty repair, and is usually the first item to appear in the warranty history.
But when it was done was not regulated. At our store, which was fairly high volume, we had a full time employee (Lonnie) who did nothing but PDI. If he found a true defect outside of the scope of PDI, or if a defect was spotted during new vehicle check-in( receiving it off the truck), a ticket was written to send it to a line technician for warranty repair.
But during a busy selling season, with lots of sales, and lots of new cars coming in, Lonnie could not keep up.
So, off the truck (I did vehicle check-in...off-the-truck defect inspection), they would go straight onto the lot. It might be the back lot to await PDI, it might be the front lot when we had a "full house". As Lonnie needed work, units were brought to him and prepped. So some cars on the lot had been through PDI, some had not.
When things were busy up front (high sales) but slow in back (little service work), and when Lonnie could not keep up, if there were cars that still needed PDI, line techs would be assigned those cars, just to keep them busy flagging time.
So I think dealer policy, practice and volume probably had a lot to do with this. Thus you are seeing photos of some that have been PDI'd, and some that have not.
Last edited by IMissMy86TA; Aug 18, 2014 at 08:21 AM.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Tom Jumper Chevrolet, Atlanta, GA. March 1987.
Pic #2 is a good reference point of where the build sheet ended up from the assembly plant. Pass. side floorboard.
Pic #2 is a good reference point of where the build sheet ended up from the assembly plant. Pass. side floorboard.
Supreme Member




Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 48
From: Dallas
Car: 1991 Trans Am Vert
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 baby
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 683
Likes: 4
From: Mountain Maryland
Car: 89 RS Vert, 89 Formula, 89 Bird
Engine: L03, TBI 350, none
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4, none
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.45, none
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 99
From: Huntsville AL
Car: 88GTA
Engine: 5.7TPI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Supreme Member




Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 48
From: Dallas
Car: 1991 Trans Am Vert
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 baby
Member

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 5
From: South Pekin, IL
Car: 87 Fomula, bought new, October 86
Engine: 305 Quadrajet,
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt now in, starting on body work
Re: Post Pictures from back in the day.
Oct. 86. Just a few days after I picked it up-no front plate yet. Still patiently waiting in my garage to return it to new...








