History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2017, 10:45 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
yo soy el warg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

If the guy would have put a car like this away in a bubble it would have been the right decision.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/122402154126
Old 03-18-2017, 11:38 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (58)
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 20,309
Received 1,052 Likes on 748 Posts
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

It's kinda sad either way, if you think about it... In both cases no one really got to enjoy either car. The RS on account of being a nothing sixer, and the Iroc on account of it sitting in storage 98% of the time.

I appreciate seeing a nicely preserved thirdgen. I've mostly preserved most of the ones I've kept for 17 years. But I'd be hard pressed to say that I've enjoyed them as much as I have my fleet of beaters I've owned in the same time period. There's a certain freedom that comes with a higher mileage car that you just don't get with a pristine original. A small tear in a seat, or a door ding still rubs me wrong, but at the end of the day it's no biggie.
Old 03-18-2017, 01:47 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
PurelyPMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 3,038
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Original Owner
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M39 MM5
Axle/Gears: G80 G92 J65
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Here is the problem - all of these NAPA sourced replacement parts!

Old 03-18-2017, 02:06 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
BOTTLEDZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Mass
Posts: 3,871
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Im digging that Iroc and its only 15 minutes from me. Maybe I can convince the shop owner to let me drool over it. Id also love to take a pictures of it for restoration purposes.
Old 03-18-2017, 02:51 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Originally Posted by Drew
It's kinda sad either way, if you think about it... In both cases no one really got to enjoy either car. The RS on account of being a nothing sixer, and the Iroc on account of it sitting in storage 98% of the time.

I appreciate seeing a nicely preserved thirdgen. I've mostly preserved most of the ones I've kept for 17 years. But I'd be hard pressed to say that I've enjoyed them as much as I have my fleet of beaters I've owned in the same time period. There's a certain freedom that comes with a higher mileage car that you just don't get with a pristine original. A small tear in a seat, or a door ding still rubs me wrong, but at the end of the day it's no biggie.
I hear you. A well maintained 3rd gen with over 100,000 miles can be driven with abandon.
Old 03-19-2017, 12:45 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Croz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Now that is a beautiful car. I post on the "91 RS" that it was in fact US dollars, not Canadian. Comparing the 2, there is no question which one I would be bringing home. But seeing the price of this one, makes me real happy with the deal I got.
Old 03-19-2017, 09:28 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
PurelyPMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 3,038
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC Original Owner
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M39 MM5
Axle/Gears: G80 G92 J65
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Originally Posted by Croz
Now that is a beautiful car. I post on the "91 RS" that it was in fact US dollars, not Canadian. Comparing the 2, there is no question which one I would be bringing home. But seeing the price of this one, makes me real happy with the deal I got.
You stole your car - that's all there is to it!
Old 03-20-2017, 09:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
ev305tpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MA
Posts: 732
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Car: 92 & 91 Z28 1LEs, 87 IROC-Z, 90 ZR1
Engine: L98, LT5
Transmission: 700R4, 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.42, 3.73, 3.27
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

I almost bought this exact car a few years ago from the original owner as it wasn't advertised, but someone else with deeper pockets got wind of it and stepped in at the time to buy it... I remember being pretty upset about it. However, in hindsight, it was very nice, but being as picky as I am it definitely wasn't perfect and there were some body imperfections that would have driven me nuts. There were multiple dings in the car that broke thru the paint and had been touched up. But still, it was a very nice example.
Old 03-21-2017, 07:15 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,422
Received 721 Likes on 490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Originally Posted by Drew
It's kinda sad either way, if you think about it... In both cases no one really got to enjoy either car. The RS on account of being a nothing sixer, and the Iroc on account of it sitting in storage 98% of the time.

I appreciate seeing a nicely preserved thirdgen. I've mostly preserved most of the ones I've kept for 17 years. But I'd be hard pressed to say that I've enjoyed them as much as I have my fleet of beaters I've owned in the same time period. There's a certain freedom that comes with a higher mileage car that you just don't get with a pristine original. A small tear in a seat, or a door ding still rubs me wrong, but at the end of the day it's no biggie.
I totally agree!
Old 03-21-2017, 09:09 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Originally Posted by PurelyPMD
Here is the problem - all of these NAPA sourced replacement parts!

I would be more worried about the fact that some knucklehead tech took the dash apart then the replacement heater core.
Old 03-22-2017, 10:16 AM
  #11  
Member

 
bigarmzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Elkins W.V.a.
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 2wd
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2:73 open (for now)
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

holy crap! that cherry iroc gives me wood! the freaking A-arms are still shiney black, what a cherry of a car
Old 03-22-2017, 11:47 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
RedLeader289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,483
Received 106 Likes on 87 Posts
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 385 Fastburn
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 9-bolt posi, 3.27 gears
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

Clean car, never been a fan of the red ones though (idk why). I imagine they could get 22 for it, either way it's not a bad price for what you get.

But man, ya gotta think that car has had a pretty sad life. It's like building a house and never living in it.

I'd DD it all day.
Old 03-25-2017, 09:27 PM
  #13  
Member

 
DAVEY420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Trevose,PA
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 IROC Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: TCI TH350 TCI 2400 STALL
Axle/Gears: 3.42 WORN OUT POSI
Re: Compare this 1990 IROC to the 1991 287 mile RS

I'm curious as to how it took 19.9 gallons of gas. Probably a generic value on the invoice but still that customer probably thought he got 20 gallons. Lol




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 PM.