History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2017, 09:44 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Hi, I was just reading the "standard catalog of Firebird" and noticed that in 1982 these cars started out with 16 gallon gas tanks, then in 1983 the capacity was increased to 16.1 gallons, it remains that way until 1985 when it dropped to 15.5 gallons and remained that way until 1992 when third generation production ended.
What was the reason behind the fuel tanks change to a lower capacity?
Old 04-13-2017, 12:17 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Catheran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Was that the time period when they started going to fuel injection and needed an intank pump??
Old 04-13-2017, 12:31 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
navy02ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,208
Received 63 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

'85 was the first year that you could get TPI, so I'd say the need for an in-tank pump on some models and the drop in capacity are probably related.
Old 04-15-2017, 10:04 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

I'd blame mpg/epa.
GM for years has limited gas tank volume for mileage.

Last edited by Vanilla Ice; 04-15-2017 at 10:09 PM.
Old 04-16-2017, 08:08 AM
  #5  
On Probation

 
sonjaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 1,588
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 84 Z-28
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: r-700
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

I guess the pump in the tank started with the 83 HO motors.
My 84 has both pumps.
Old 04-16-2017, 09:15 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Originally Posted by Vanilla Ice
I'd blame mpg/epa.
GM for years has limited gas tank volume for mileage.
I don't understand. Why would you reduce the tank size for mileage? I can't see 5 gallons making that much of a difference. I am assuming you are meaning they did it to meet "CAFE" standards,right?
Supposedly wasn't that the reason some cars got those horrible plexiglass t-tops too? And why after 88 (I think) you couldn't get a 350 and t-tops? To save on weight?
Once again another example of far too much government interference in private industry. Small wonder the cars look like plastic tonka toys today

Last edited by JimRockford; 04-16-2017 at 09:22 AM.
Old 04-16-2017, 09:18 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Originally Posted by sonjaab
I guess the pump in the tank started with the 83 HO motors.
My 84 has both pumps.
Why would someone want both an mechanical and electric in tank pump on a carbed car? As another member had suggested here, why didn't GM just reroute the fuel lines so they did not have a vapor lock issue? We didn't have "helper" pumps in the tanks of cars prior to this.

So what happens on your 84 when the in tank pump goes out? Can you still keep driving it with a mechanical pump?

I had a couple 82 and 83's before and none of them had an electric pump inside the tank, and I never had any vapor lock issues and I live in California where it gets hot in the summer.
Old 04-16-2017, 09:22 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Originally Posted by navy02ws6
'85 was the first year that you could get TPI, so I'd say the need for an in-tank pump on some models and the drop in capacity are probably related.
I am inclined to agree with your theory.
Old 04-16-2017, 09:41 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
gt4373's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 2,744
Received 258 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: 5.0 Liter 4-BBL V8 High Output
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

For The Camaro's The 1985 Brochure Shows The Sport Coupe And Berlinetta Got 15.5 Tanks And The Z28's And IROC's Got 16.2 Tanks.

Maybe Is Was Similar As The Base Firebird/Se Vs The Trans Am.
Old 04-16-2017, 10:19 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Dyno Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,674
Likes: 0
Received 106 Likes on 65 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

I would guess a misprint, I have changed out both and never noticed a difference.
Old 04-16-2017, 10:53 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member
 
Ghettobird52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 88 Firebird Formula
Engine: LO5 5.7 TBI/Ebl Flash
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 stock rear end
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Wow there must be alot more in my tank than i can fit. i usually fill up around 1/4 and i can only fit 10-11 gals.
Old 04-18-2017, 11:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Originally Posted by gt4373
For The Camaro's The 1985 Brochure Shows The Sport Coupe And Berlinetta Got 15.5 Tanks And The Z28's And IROC's Got 16.2 Tanks.

Maybe Is Was Similar As The Base Firebird/Se Vs The Trans Am.
Interesting,according to Standard Catalog Of Firebird all models got 15.5
Old 04-19-2017, 12:10 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

For the record, the Crossfire and US Iron Dukes had in tank fuel pumps from day one.
Old 04-19-2017, 12:35 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
JimRockford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Originally Posted by chazman
For the record, the Crossfire and US Iron Dukes had in tank fuel pumps from day one.
Yes,I was aware of that since Cross-Fire and the Iron Duke were both TBI cars.
TBI and TPI cars have electric pumps on the tank.
Old 04-19-2017, 01:38 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

 
Vanilla Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am Conv
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Why did the gas tank capacity drop in 1985?

Even with the tanks being identical "full volume" could be artificially limited with the vent to force the nozzle to shut off early.
Again for weight/mpg/CAFE reasons.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.