LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

lt1 408?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #1  
91rs5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed
lt1 408?

Is it possible to make a 408 lt1? using 4.00 crank, and 4.030 bore? Are there any negative effects of using this stroke? I haven't seen any 408 lt1s, i've seen a lot of 396 lt1s. I'm thinking of rebuilding the lt1 with better components and add some displacement while i'm at it before I drop it in my car, so I don't have to do it twice. I'm not planning to rev the motor past 6k, maximum 6500 rpm.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 10:30 PM
  #2  
TexasLT1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 3
From: Angleton, TX
Car: '92 RS
no, 396 is as far as I've ever seen anyone go on a factory block, and that in itself is pushing the limits of the block. If you want to go that far, get an aftermarket block and stay away from anything LT1, there is no point if you want large cubic inches.


*Edit* After rereading what I typed, I'm pretty sure I've seen 1 or 2 408's, but I'm almost positive they went with a SB400 block, and in doing so its not really an LT1 anymore.

If you want cubes, go with a 383 and not have to worry if your cylinder walls are too thin.

Last edited by TexasLT1; Apr 17, 2005 at 10:32 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 07:01 PM
  #3  
91rs5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed
Originally posted by TexasLT1
no, 396 is as far as I've ever seen anyone go on a factory block, and that in itself is pushing the limits of the block. If you want to go that far, get an aftermarket block and stay away from anything LT1, there is no point if you want large cubic inches.


*Edit* After rereading what I typed, I'm pretty sure I've seen 1 or 2 408's, but I'm almost positive they went with a SB400 block, and in doing so its not really an LT1 anymore.

If you want cubes, go with a 383 and not have to worry if your cylinder walls are too thin.
why is 396 pushing the limits of the block? 396 is still .30 over right? just with 3.875 stroke instead of 3.750. Unless you mean its too much stress on the rods or something like that.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
91rs5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed
sorry i meant .030
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #5  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by 91rs5.0
why is 396 pushing the limits of the block? 396 is still .30 over right? just with 3.875 stroke instead of 3.750. Unless you mean its too much stress on the rods or something like that.
Correct. However there are far more clearance issues with the larger crank than with a 383. A lot more items need to be grounded, the stock windage tray will no longer fit. You also run into running (not always) a smaller base circle cam.

A 408 LT1 has been done, believe it was done by combination motorsports or some other vendor. There are a few out I believe it involved a billet 4.000 stroke crank and boring .030 over. Not very practical for an extra 10 cubes.


Stick with the 383 or 396 you won't gain much more performance with the extra 9 cubes, i'd say 10 more rwhp at most.


f your pockets are extremely deep you could always sleeve a lt1 block and make a 427. That has also been done, but yet again impractical when a 400 sbc can be netted for 1/5 the cost of building a 427 lt1.

Last edited by pasky; Apr 18, 2005 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #6  
91rs5.0's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: 91 RS (Black, T-top)
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 5-speed
Ok. then i think i'm gonna go the 383 route. i can use stock windage tray and all with that right? can i clearance the block myself, or is that better left to the machineshop?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Yes it can be done yourself, looking at mine all it seems like they did was put the crank and rods in the block and see where the rod bolts touched and just took some metal off the block near the bottom of the cylinder bores to clear them. You will need to run washers on the stock windage tray to clear the rod bolts and bang the stock oil pan a little near the sides.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88SS6SPEED
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Nov 11, 2015 07:05 AM
L0tuS
LTX and LSX
2
Oct 4, 2015 08:07 AM
WejaZ28
DFI and ECM
17
Oct 3, 2015 07:38 PM
CatmanFS
LTX and LSX
1
Sep 19, 2015 09:00 AM
L0tuS
LTX and LSX
0
Sep 4, 2015 11:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM.