LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
89ROC-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 370 LSX, LS3 Top End
Transmission: Built T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" Aluminum Center 3.89's
Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I was diggin around for intakes and found an amazing thread on the hp differences on the 3 intakes. The professional products 96mm looks like it can handle some power!

(i hope i'm not breaking any rules by posting this here, if i am please delete)

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/dynamo...e-numbers.html
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #2  
SheldonZ28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Guelph, Ontario
Car: 89 IROC/05 RX8
Engine: LS1/LS1
Transmission: T56/T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 GM/3.55 8.8
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Look closer at the graph.

LS6 & Professional Products HP wise were identical until approx 6000rpm, where the LS6 fell off a tad, (7ish hp, not much at all)

LS6 made more tq down low, and then the professional products again picked up a little bit at 5600rpm.

FAST intake produced the best under the curve power, peak power etc.

After seeing those graphs, no way would i invest in a Proffessional products intake. Identical to LS6 until high RPM where minimal gains are seen, and the LS6 delivers more tq. Not to mention the Professional products is a Aluminum intake, and is much more prone to heat sink then a nylon intake, so after a 45 minute drive, it would likely be performing identical to the LS6 at all points.

IMO, its LS6 or FAST for cathedral port heads. Ive yet to see anything really do as well.

Even for boost, i build a 402ci w/ Paxton Novi 2000, using an LS6 intake it made 839rwhp, and my buddy's vette is a 402ci w/ Vortech YSi, makes 922rwhp w/ LS6 intake.

Sometimes its not nessicary to go further then the general's parts
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #3  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 876
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
Car: RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" for the ladies
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Metal intakes like the professional products ones heat soak and add weight to the nose
Only thing they are good for is containing a nitrous backfire or boost, so they have their place.
Beyond that all metal intakes suck for the same reason.

From personal experiance the ls6 intake keeps up until about 90mph at which point my FAST intake seems to pull away.
All those idiots keep complaining about how much the FAST costs. Well actually it's the ones still running the ls6 trying to feel better about continually losing to FAST motors.

I want to laugh in their face every time the price thing comes up and remind them all I got my FAST for $550 off ebay brand new with live's 30% cash back and everyone of them could have done the same thing so boo fricking hoo.

Last edited by Aaron91RS; Jul 12, 2009 at 11:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #4  
Z28FAST1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 741
Likes: 1
From: Baldwin Park
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I’m actually looking into Edelbrock new intake for the LS swap crowd “Pro-Flo XT.” They run about $430 and I can sell my LS6 for about $300. The initial model had some fitment issues (throttle body and injectors) but Edelbrock has addressed this issues in the newer model.



Waiting on dyno results for a Fast 92/92 vs. Edelbrock

Check out the buzz on ls1tech:
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/genera...than-fast.html
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #5  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
$550 for 17 HP seems insane to me. Got to be cheaper ways to get that kind of gain.

But, I'm new here. . .
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #6  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 876
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis
Car: RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9" for the ladies
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

$500+fuel rails$+trying to fit under a low hood which it won't clear.
Yet another try and fail to knock off the fast intake.
Why is this so hard I don't understand.
The fast is nothing more then an ls1/ls6 with bigger runners and TB.
Yet in all the years it's been out instead of just copying GM's design abeit with bigger runners every other manufactorer keeps trying to reinvent the wheel. Half the time they end up 'just about ready to debut' and never make it out of the gate and the rest have fitment issues that require different injectors, fuel rails, lines, TB fitment etc etc.

Good grief there is HUGE money to be made if you just come in and copy the fast intake and resell it at $500.
It blows my mind competitors continue to let fast bask in their total domination at a 4 figure price.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #7  
Z28FAST1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 741
Likes: 1
From: Baldwin Park
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Originally Posted by Aaron91RS
$500+fuel rails$+trying to fit under a low hood which it won't clear.
Yet another try and fail to knock off the fast intake.
Why is this so hard I don't understand.
The fast is nothing more then an ls1/ls6 with bigger runners and TB.
Yet in all the years it's been out instead of just copying GM's design abeit with bigger runners every other manufactorer keeps trying to reinvent the wheel. Half the time they end up 'just about ready to debut' and never make it out of the gate and the rest have fitment issues that require different injectors, fuel rails, lines, TB fitment etc etc.

Good grief there is HUGE money to be made if you just come in and copy the fast intake and resell it at $500.
It blows my mind competitors continue to let fast bask in their total domination at a 4 figure price.
$439 from Summit but the target price was $350 which might be reached once production catches up with the demand.

Small mods will allow the LS1 type fuel rails to work as noted in the thread.

As far as clearance goes, I have a 3 inch cowl so I don’t see it being an issue for me. I believe it’s only a bit taller than the L76 truck manifolds.

I really want to see what kind of power these things put down vs. the FAST 92/92. If I could get a FAST 92/92 @ 30% it wouldn’t even be a question!!! Plus I agree with you about aftermarket companies failing to duplicate FAST results. I was hoping Edelbrock took a step in the right direction and drove the competition to lower its price.

At this point it makes it difficult for me to spend $1,250+ for a FAST 92/92 NW for 20-25 rwhp. I think i'll just change out my nitrous jets from 125rwhp to 150rwhp in a few minutes for free
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #8  
89ROC-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 370 LSX, LS3 Top End
Transmission: Built T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" Aluminum Center 3.89's
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

Why they even cost that much is beyond me. If i can find a used FAST i'd get it if its under 500.

And that edelbrock looks like they tried to make a copy of a sheet metal intake, except 4" taller.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
Klortho's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Kingston, Tn
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70 posi
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I still think that the 879.95 price of the FAST for another 20hp is sort of stupid as well.

I know plenty of guys running 10's in the 1/4 running the LS6 intake, that's the route I'll be going.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #10  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I've seen a 35 hp gain switching to the FAST 90, but as I'll be adding a pair of T4S04s, spooling up to 13.5 psi, I'm leaning toward BBK's cast aluminum.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #11  
89ROC-Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: 370 LSX, LS3 Top End
Transmission: Built T-56
Axle/Gears: 9" Aluminum Center 3.89's
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

yea i could get a ls6 and have it ported to 90 by tpis down the road from me. Then geta NW 90 TB. HMM, by the time i buy the intake, port it, and buy a TB im at 1K already. Then might as well spend another couple hundred and get this fast 92/92 for 1200 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FAST-...Q5fAccessories
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 09:43 AM
  #12  
andrew69_04's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NE & KS
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Prof. Products vs FAST vs LS6

I've had a few of these intakes. LS6 is a nice piece all around and i dont have any complaints about it. The Fast is definitly a nice piece as well, and is a proven performer which is why so many of them are running around on the streets. The Professional Products intake is junk. main reason i dont like it is the style of gaskets used. Too many people have had problems with them leaking. The stock LS1 style gasket intakes work the best (fast, ls6, and BBK). I've ran the BBK. overall its a very nice piece, only down fall to it is the weight you pick up but i did gain a few ponies with it, and it holds up to any NOS backfires you might have. As far as heat soak is concerned, its a joke. Heatsoak doesnt matter. take a temp gun and check your temps on a composite intake and a aluminum intake on a running motor. IAT temps are still the same on both. On a carb'd app, its a big deal. Too many people believe what they read on forums.

so to cap this all off. FAST, BBK, and LS6 are all very nice. Pro Prod is a piece of S#*T, and i dont know anything about the edelbrock piece yet
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
hectre13
Car Audio
26
Mar 3, 2022 05:38 PM
Thornburg
Aftermarket Product Review
10
Oct 6, 2015 12:04 PM
paul_huryk
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
1
Oct 1, 2015 04:27 PM
Dragonsys
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 25, 2015 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.