Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
i have decided recently that a LR4 (4.8) will not suit the power i have intended for my camaro, so i'm back at this board!
i like the idea of having an aluminum engine, but which will make more power with less modifications? i'm hoping to go the ls2 route, but ls2's are also DBW so i'm not sure about that, is there anyway i can convert it from DBW to DBC???
i like the idea of having an aluminum engine, but which will make more power with less modifications? i'm hoping to go the ls2 route, but ls2's are also DBW so i'm not sure about that, is there anyway i can convert it from DBW to DBC??? Senior Member




Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 922
Likes: 33
From: Kansas
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 6.0L LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 3.92
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
yes...go with a 411 computer with red/blue connections and get an ls6/ls1 intake with the proper throttle body. you can probably do it with the ls2 intake as well with some different connectors. lq9 will be cheaper and give you more room to build.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
this project will really kick off around the end of January, but i will be gathering up parts and accessories in the mean time and doing some research. will post pics of the vehicle later on. it's a beater and needs alot of work, but again, not bad for the price
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,079
Likes: 4
From: Pepperell, MA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LQ9/L92
Transmission: 4L60E
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
bottom ends are pretty comperable, sensor locations will differ and different reluctor wheels on the crank (depending on year) IIRC.
DBC conversion shouldn't be an issue with the right pcm; not all DBW pcms have the drivers for the IAC. i'm using a pcm out of a 00 silverado for my LQ9/L92 mutt. Throttle cable adapter bracket on the LS3 intake and a 90mm edelbrock TB
DBC conversion shouldn't be an issue with the right pcm; not all DBW pcms have the drivers for the IAC. i'm using a pcm out of a 00 silverado for my LQ9/L92 mutt. Throttle cable adapter bracket on the LS3 intake and a 90mm edelbrock TB
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg VA
Car: 88 IROCZ 350
Engine: 355 cu TPI
Transmission: 4L60 w/ 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt W/370 gear
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
LQ9 and LS2s are 364 c.u. The LS2 weight less but the LQ9 has better heads so you can make more power with the stock heads. The truck LQ9s and LQ4s are bless with heads that are the same as the LS6 heads except that the truck heads have bigger combustion chambers, (lower compression). LQ9 heads flow about 40 cfm more than the LS2 heads and when ported and bigger valve intalled they can flow around 300 cfm. If weight is not a problem I would use the LQ4, LQ9 motors they can make a lot of power and they are cheaper than the LS2.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
You're only looking at a weight saving of around 150lbs I believe. To me, that's not worth paying more up front for the block as opposed to the iron block, and you have a lot more room for upgrades with the iron version. You can't bore out the aluminum blocks like you can with iron. Why do you think people with GTO's and Corvettes ditch the LS2 for an iron block when theyre building a 4xx ci motor.
The money you'll save buying the cheaper block will allow you to put that one extra mod towards the motor and will equalize the performance had you gone with a lighter weight block.
The money you'll save buying the cheaper block will allow you to put that one extra mod towards the motor and will equalize the performance had you gone with a lighter weight block.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
LQ9 and LS2s are 364 c.u. The LS2 weight less but the LQ9 has better heads so you can make more power with the stock heads. The truck LQ9s and LQ4s are bless with heads that are the same as the LS6 heads except that the truck heads have bigger combustion chambers, (lower compression). LQ9 heads flow about 40 cfm more than the LS2 heads and when ported and bigger valve intalled they can flow around 300 cfm. If weight is not a problem I would use the LQ4, LQ9 motors they can make a lot of power and they are cheaper than the LS2.
again not to start a riot but this kid is in high school and changes his mind every week. BUT he has good intentions. I mean who wants to put a 6.0 in a third gen camaro with a full spohn suspension, a fast intake, and other features MY build has... But im not one to judge.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg VA
Car: 88 IROCZ 350
Engine: 355 cu TPI
Transmission: 4L60 w/ 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt W/370 gear
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Ok, an LS2 with LQ4/LQ9 heads will work great. These heads are casting number 317. You want to only get the casting number 317, other truck heads from the 5.3L and 4.7L engines are as bad the LS1/LS2 heads. To keep the cost down just get set of forged pistons and rods, the factory cast crank can take over 700hp. I'm going to do the same for my 88 IROC. I already have two T4 turbos, two 40mm HKS waste gates, Greddy Type R BOV, ethanol injection, HKS 4"x12"x24" intercooler and a Blitz electronic boost controller.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg VA
Car: 88 IROCZ 350
Engine: 355 cu TPI
Transmission: 4L60 w/ 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt W/370 gear
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
How so are 317 heads "better" than a 243 head off a ls2 or a ls6 because they have the exact same runner volume. and for a n/a engine the 65 cc chamber would be ideal for more compression, a boosted 6.0 would benefit from a 317 head because of the larger combustion chamber.
again not to start a riot but this kid is in high school and changes his mind every week. BUT he has good intentions. I mean who wants to put a 6.0 in a third gen camaro with a full spohn suspension, a fast intake, and other features MY build has... But im not one to judge.
again not to start a riot but this kid is in high school and changes his mind every week. BUT he has good intentions. I mean who wants to put a 6.0 in a third gen camaro with a full spohn suspension, a fast intake, and other features MY build has... But im not one to judge.
The LS1/LS2 heads are not the same as the LS6 heads. LS1/LS2 heads flow about 220/225 cfm. The LQ4/LQ9 head is the same casting as the LS6 with the exception of the larger combustion chambers. The LS6 and LQ4/9 heads flow 260 cfm right out of the box. With some minor port clean up and a good 3 angle valve job they can flow even more.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
LQ9 and LS2s are 364 c.u. The LS2 weight less but the LQ9 has better heads so you can make more power with the stock heads. The truck LQ9s and LQ4s are bless with heads that are the same as the LS6 heads except that the truck heads have bigger combustion chambers, (lower compression). LQ9 heads flow about 40 cfm more than the LS2 heads and when ported and bigger valve intalled they can flow around 300 cfm. If weight is not a problem I would use the LQ4, LQ9 motors they can make a lot of power and they are cheaper than the LS2.
The LS1/LS2 heads are not the same as the LS6 heads. LS1/LS2 heads flow about 220/225 cfm. The LQ4/LQ9 head is the same casting as the LS6 with the exception of the larger combustion chambers. The LS6 and LQ4/9 heads flow 260 cfm right out of the box. With some minor port clean up and a good 3 angle valve job they can flow even more. 

Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
The ls6 came with hollow stem and soldium filled valves from 02-04 in the 243 heads, EVERY ls2 came with 243 heads with standard valves the same size as the hollow stem and sodium valves. Only difference between ls6 heads and ls2 heads is one has hollow stem intake valves/sodium filled exhaust valves and one has regular valves. 241(ls1) heads and ls2(243) heads are WAY different.
you just stated the difference yourself.. valves and springs that's it.. not worth the retarded price difference unless your building an ls6 clone and plan to use the stock rate springs. Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
ls1 heads are 241 heads, ls6 and ls2 heads are 243. i was stating the last part because tonyz383 was comparing ls1 and ls2 heads together when he should be comparing ls6 and ls2 heads together.
241-stock 01-02 ls1 heads
243-stock ls6/ls2 heads
317-stock on 6.0 truck engines
862/706-stock 4.8/5.3 heads
806-stock 97/98 ls1 heads
853-stock 99-00 ls1 heads
241-stock 01-02 ls1 heads
243-stock ls6/ls2 heads
317-stock on 6.0 truck engines
862/706-stock 4.8/5.3 heads
806-stock 97/98 ls1 heads
853-stock 99-00 ls1 heads
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
again not to start a riot but this kid is in high school and changes his mind every week. BUT he has good intentions. I mean who wants to put a 6.0 in a third gen camaro with a full spohn suspension, a fast intake, and other features MY build has... But im not one to judge.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
i'm no longer in high school, i dropped out about a month ago FYI, and unlike your swap, you keep saying your going with the whipple charger, i'm keepin N/A power, and unlike your car, mine is an RS. my car will in no way be anything like yours when i'm done... right now it's just a stock ls2
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
anyway back to the topic, LS2 vs. LQ9. did some research, and LS2's are rated at 400BHP, and LQ9's are rated 300.
anyone with dyno numbers of an LQ9, 317's, and a 102mm intake?
anyone with dyno numbers of an LQ9, 317's, and a 102mm intake? Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
An LQ9 equipped with the same intake manifold and heads as an LS2 will put out the same numbers. It's the same block just iron. The truck blocks had intakes geared towards off the line torque not horsepower.
After reading your last comment about school, I'm going to sugges not doing anything to it until you finish high school. Really, you dropped out of high school and you're worried about an engine swap? Your compass is completely jacked up. You need to focus on more important things right now. I really don't care that I'm sounding like a douche right now, it had to be said.
After reading your last comment about school, I'm going to sugges not doing anything to it until you finish high school. Really, you dropped out of high school and you're worried about an engine swap? Your compass is completely jacked up. You need to focus on more important things right now. I really don't care that I'm sounding like a douche right now, it had to be said.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
An LQ9 equipped with the same intake manifold and heads as an LS2 will put out the same numbers. It's the same block just iron. The truck blocks had intakes geared towards off the line torque not horsepower.
After reading your last comment about school, I'm going to sugges not doing anything to it until you finish high school. Really, you dropped out of high school and you're worried about an engine swap? Your compass is completely jacked up. You need to focus on more important things right now. I really don't care that I'm sounding like a douche right now, it had to be said.
After reading your last comment about school, I'm going to sugges not doing anything to it until you finish high school. Really, you dropped out of high school and you're worried about an engine swap? Your compass is completely jacked up. You need to focus on more important things right now. I really don't care that I'm sounding like a douche right now, it had to be said.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
I mean really, your interests shown on your user profile says "mechanicing". Finishing school would serve you well.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Your compass... I don't really know how to explain the analogy other than pointing out that it makes my point ever the more valid.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
I don't own an IROC.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
300hp 315 ft/lbs, thing is crazy fast.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: MD
Car: 88 Iroc-z
Engine: ls1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
. JkI at least waited til summer break to even start. And I also do agree with pocket and bluez.
Get school done then worry about a big car project
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Shakopee, Mn
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: T5
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
To me the decision you need to make is saying, "Do you want fries with that?", or "Thank you for congratulating me for graduating high school!"
To expound on the "compass" comment, he means that your priorities are out of whack. I know some very successful people in this world, that did not go to college, but they at least finished high school. Their main decision after that was not, but an LS2 or LQ9. Good luck in life if this is the path you are taking.
To expound on the "compass" comment, he means that your priorities are out of whack. I know some very successful people in this world, that did not go to college, but they at least finished high school. Their main decision after that was not, but an LS2 or LQ9. Good luck in life if this is the path you are taking.
Senior Member




Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 922
Likes: 33
From: Kansas
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 6.0L LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 3.92
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
1fstbrd...please use this board as a resource and not a place to garner attention.
to do the swap with the parts you are talking about, you need to put together about $6-8000 depending on the transmission.
to do the swap with the parts you are talking about, you need to put together about $6-8000 depending on the transmission.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
that's what i inteded on doing until 1nasty86 rattled my can, i keep trying to get back to the topic. i plan on swapping a ls2 t56, into a firebird if i can ever find one in my area, don't plan on doing anything with the camaro until i get a DD, engine will be bare bones stock while i do work with the camaro, but anyways, with an ls2 maxed out with modifications, N/A power, how much power am i looking at putting down?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Max, like 325hp at the wheels. Thing will be wicked fast.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
You might be able to turbo it and squeeze out 375 at the wheels.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
I've even seen someone on YouTube use a leaf blower as a homemade supercharger kit, you could give that a try. Seemed to work for them but I'm pretty sure the person that designed it didn't finish high school. Just sayin'.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...products_id=39
1bar boost is only $159 Stack em up and go 4bar. that 58 pounds of boost for a meager $636 bucks.
Its gonna be so fast your gonna need the cross drilled brake rotors / lines / etc. to stop on the street or track.
http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...&products_id=1
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Its gonna be so fast your gonna need the cross drilled brake rotors / lines / etc. to stop on the street or track.
http://kalecoauto.com/index.php?main...&products_id=1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Andalusia, AL
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
i've heard of people putting hair driers in the C/A/I and hookin it up to a toggle switch, but never heard of a leaf blower motor.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
Leaf blowers are like the F1 Procharger and a hair dryer is like a D1.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
hair dryer- chinese made junk
make sure you use psi rated couplers! so when a certain amount of boost is reached all the couplers expand and reveal small air pockets so the excess psi can escape
Last edited by 1nasty86; Nov 16, 2011 at 07:47 PM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Car: 1986 camaro
Engine: ls2
Transmission: FLT stage 6 60e
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73's
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 6
From: O'Fallon, MO
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: Forced With a Decision (LS2 or LQ9)
I heard the new MS5 is a 110hp upgrade on a stock motor, and it's great with blowers. Might wanna check it out. The make it on a 103 LSA.






don't u have an LQ9 in your iroc? 