wheels up!!
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Originally posted by 1bad406
yeah good luck getting your doors to close back after a few more launches like that with no sfc's or roll cage..
yeah good luck getting your doors to close back after a few more launches like that with no sfc's or roll cage..
Just wait till I get the car running the times I think its capable of and put a bigger tire under it
...remember that quote it could come back to haunt me when I twist my "delicate" subframe
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,271
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Well this thread has been around enough I might as well contribute with my own pic.
You need good traction. If the wheels are spinning, it won't pull the front up.
Weight transfer. A nose heavy car needs a lot of work to pull the front wheels. The more weight that can be moved back, the better.
Suspension geometry: The torque arm is like a single ladder bar. It has a fixed point for the instant center. By moving that point higher or lower, you can shift where the car will lift weight. The LCA act like the bottom bars on a 4 link system. You really need to see something like 4 link setup software to see where the best settings should be. My ladder bar settings were set very close to 100% anti-squat so my front end didn't come up much but my back end also didn't drop down. I've played with my ladder bar settings so next spring I should be able to pull the wheels at bit higher to help with weight transfer. My car is very nose heavy.
High stall converter with a transbrake or a high rpm clutch drop helps because of the instant shock to the driveline. That's also providing everything mentioned above is good.
Pulling the wheels isn't as easy as it looks. There's a lot of things that need to be just right. A low hp, 13 second car can pull the wheels a foot into the air if there's enough weight moved back and there's good traction.
You need good traction. If the wheels are spinning, it won't pull the front up.
Weight transfer. A nose heavy car needs a lot of work to pull the front wheels. The more weight that can be moved back, the better.
Suspension geometry: The torque arm is like a single ladder bar. It has a fixed point for the instant center. By moving that point higher or lower, you can shift where the car will lift weight. The LCA act like the bottom bars on a 4 link system. You really need to see something like 4 link setup software to see where the best settings should be. My ladder bar settings were set very close to 100% anti-squat so my front end didn't come up much but my back end also didn't drop down. I've played with my ladder bar settings so next spring I should be able to pull the wheels at bit higher to help with weight transfer. My car is very nose heavy.
High stall converter with a transbrake or a high rpm clutch drop helps because of the instant shock to the driveline. That's also providing everything mentioned above is good.
Pulling the wheels isn't as easy as it looks. There's a lot of things that need to be just right. A low hp, 13 second car can pull the wheels a foot into the air if there's enough weight moved back and there's good traction.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: North Ga.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 406
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Moser 31 spline / 4.86
Originally posted by 88IROC350TPI
First folks said I'd never be able to hook hard enough to yank a wheel off the ground with stock suspension now everyone tells me I'm going to twist the car up. Only one way to find out and prove/disprove that common thought.
Just wait till I get the car running the times I think its capable of and put a bigger tire under it
...remember that quote it could come back to haunt me when I twist my "delicate" subframe
First folks said I'd never be able to hook hard enough to yank a wheel off the ground with stock suspension now everyone tells me I'm going to twist the car up. Only one way to find out and prove/disprove that common thought.
Just wait till I get the car running the times I think its capable of and put a bigger tire under it
...remember that quote it could come back to haunt me when I twist my "delicate" subframe
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by 1bad406
I only say it because I've seen it happen. I'm not just pulling it out of the air because thats what I think. The F-body's chassis is weak unless beefed up with sfc's or a cage. They twist real easy when you start launching hard with a t-brake or a hard hitting clutch...
I only say it because I've seen it happen. I'm not just pulling it out of the air because thats what I think. The F-body's chassis is weak unless beefed up with sfc's or a cage. They twist real easy when you start launching hard with a t-brake or a hard hitting clutch...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
Suspension geometry: The torque arm is like a single ladder bar. It has a fixed point for the instant center. By moving that point higher or lower, you can shift where the car will lift weight.
Suspension geometry: The torque arm is like a single ladder bar. It has a fixed point for the instant center. By moving that point higher or lower, you can shift where the car will lift weight.
Last edited by AlkyIROC; Dec 10, 2005 at 07:31 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 885
Likes: 1
From: Annapolis, Maryland
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 565 BBC
Transmission: Glide
Axle/Gears: 9 inch/spool/3.70
i have the SSM bars on my car/rear also so how do you adjust them or help the car not to squat and lift the rear for better traction? i have the stock front suspension and spohn panhard and control arms in the rear also with 50/50 shocks. i still think that i ned a higher stall to help the car but thats a hole another topic.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,271
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Originally posted by 383backinblack
the SSM bars must be located pretty well dead center on the lift point.
the SSM bars must be located pretty well dead center on the lift point.
I had to edit your last post. You don't need to quote an entire message for a simple reply.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
That doesn't mean much. Many people ask what's the best hole to put the ladder bars in thinking that level with the ground is neutral. There's a lot of factors determining what hole is neutral. It depends on wheel base, height of the tires/axle, height of the bars, center of gravity and engine centerline.
I had to edit your last post. You don't need to quote an entire message for a simple reply.
That doesn't mean much. Many people ask what's the best hole to put the ladder bars in thinking that level with the ground is neutral. There's a lot of factors determining what hole is neutral. It depends on wheel base, height of the tires/axle, height of the bars, center of gravity and engine centerline.
I had to edit your last post. You don't need to quote an entire message for a simple reply.
ya why would that be any indicator of suspension setup
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,271
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Putting them "dead center" doesn't mean much. Without knowing where the antisquat line is in the car, putting them in any hole is a guess and dead center doesn't always mean it's on the neutral line.
Like I said, people want to know what the best hole is to put ladder bars in. Level to the ground isn't a good answer and neither is "in the middle hole". Same as having LCA relocation brackets. Normally you want the LCA level with the ground but that doesn't mean it's in the best location.
Like I said, people want to know what the best hole is to put ladder bars in. Level to the ground isn't a good answer and neither is "in the middle hole". Same as having LCA relocation brackets. Normally you want the LCA level with the ground but that doesn't mean it's in the best location.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 8
From: Santa Monica, CA
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
Putting them "dead center" doesn't mean much. Without knowing where the antisquat line is in the car, putting them in any hole is a guess and dead center doesn't always mean it's on the neutral line.
Like I said, people want to know what the best hole is to put ladder bars in. Level to the ground isn't a good answer and neither is "in the middle hole". Same as having LCA relocation brackets. Normally you want the LCA level with the ground but that doesn't mean it's in the best location.
Putting them "dead center" doesn't mean much. Without knowing where the antisquat line is in the car, putting them in any hole is a guess and dead center doesn't always mean it's on the neutral line.
Like I said, people want to know what the best hole is to put ladder bars in. Level to the ground isn't a good answer and neither is "in the middle hole". Same as having LCA relocation brackets. Normally you want the LCA level with the ground but that doesn't mean it's in the best location.
i have the SSM lift bar setup, which works fantastic and judging by the cars launch characteristics its exactly where it should be.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
as far as launching and twisting goes, i should know... i have a convertible... lol.
the car will always settle back down... but you do get wear on your door hinges and latch..
if you're never putting a rollbar in, SFCs are a good idea.
if you're putting a rollbar in, you can skip the SFCs unless the bar is going to have swingout door bars... SFCs with a regular bar just adds weight.
i havent pulled the fronts on my current car yet, but i havent fully launched this car yet either... everytime ive tried and hooked (i mean EVERYtime) ive blown up the rear... ive broken the ring gear, the pinion gear, the posi, and sometimes, all of them at once! lol
now that i have the 9", a 2 step, a badass clutch, massive front weight loss, drag struts, slicks, and a few other things, i WILL have the fronts off with skinnys... i dont know if i will with fullsize tires, but i'll sure as heck try! lol.
the car will always settle back down... but you do get wear on your door hinges and latch..
if you're never putting a rollbar in, SFCs are a good idea.
if you're putting a rollbar in, you can skip the SFCs unless the bar is going to have swingout door bars... SFCs with a regular bar just adds weight.
i havent pulled the fronts on my current car yet, but i havent fully launched this car yet either... everytime ive tried and hooked (i mean EVERYtime) ive blown up the rear... ive broken the ring gear, the pinion gear, the posi, and sometimes, all of them at once! lol
now that i have the 9", a 2 step, a badass clutch, massive front weight loss, drag struts, slicks, and a few other things, i WILL have the fronts off with skinnys... i dont know if i will with fullsize tires, but i'll sure as heck try! lol.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: easton,pa
Car: 84' firebird
Engine: 440"SBC (N/A)
Transmission: th-400
Here's my launch, 1.27- 60ft (68' - 5" ) Rear tires,stock susp.,440"sbc,N/A, best time to date -9.23 @ 149 w/180ft. wheelstand, this year hope to dip in the mid to high 8's and no wheelies at all. (10.5" tires - N/A - NO WHEELIE BARS.).
Originally posted by jrsfast84
Here's my launch, 1.27- 60ft (68' - 5" ) Rear tires,stock susp.,440"sbc,N/A, best time to date -9.23 @ 149 w/180ft. wheelstand, this year hope to dip in the mid to high 8's and no wheelies at all. (10.5" tires - N/A - NO WHEELIE BARS.).
Here's my launch, 1.27- 60ft (68' - 5" ) Rear tires,stock susp.,440"sbc,N/A, best time to date -9.23 @ 149 w/180ft. wheelstand, this year hope to dip in the mid to high 8's and no wheelies at all. (10.5" tires - N/A - NO WHEELIE BARS.).
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Various barns
Car: 92 Camaro RS, 72 Camaro SS
Engine: 305TBI, til it pukes
Transmission: Auto
Originally posted by daverr
u are going to flip your car with no wheelie bar.
u are going to flip your car with no wheelie bar.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
yeah, but will 25G's pay for the damage that will insue from this wheelstand? i mean, look at what happened to that cutlass last year...
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Various barns
Car: 92 Camaro RS, 72 Camaro SS
Engine: 305TBI, til it pukes
Transmission: Auto
Yeah, that's the million dollar question. Prestige & a trashed car or just another wheelstander. I guess if you own a gremlin the answer is pretty easy!
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg, Il
Car: 1987 Trans am
Engine: Cammin Ls1
Transmission: Th400 w/brake 5500 stall
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 4.11's
The car that won it at byron this year definitley need more than 25g's to rebuild. It was a nasty crash, he had a complete tube chassis that was painted with chrome allusion paint and every little nut and bolt was chrome. I know the orange gremlin your talking about and i believe he won 3 or 4 years ago but is easily in the top 3 everytime. he would have won if it wasnt for the big crash. I mean how can you not give it to him to help him fix part of his car. I will look for the video to post.
Here are som pics of the gremlin

Here are some pics of the winner
oops...
THIRDGEN!!!!
Here are som pics of the gremlin

Here are some pics of the winner
oops...
THIRDGEN!!!!
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: North Ga.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: 406
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Moser 31 spline / 4.86
Originally posted by brutalform
Dont matter, that car is leaving real hard.
Nice pic.
Dont matter, that car is leaving real hard.
Nice pic. Supreme Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maui, Hawaii
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
ok if any of you see this, how the heck do you guys get your cars to hook that good????? ok this is my setup, 385sbc about 450-475hp, centerforce dual friction clutch, 5-speed, 9" with 3.89gears, BMR LCA's, spohn torque arm, hotchkis panhard, all adjustable, 10 point cage without doorbars, subframe connectors, 26x8.5 M/T slicks, eibach sportline drop springs, monroe sensatrac shocks and struts, 1inch rear swaybar.. i launch at 4800-5100.. the thing spins the slicks like no tomorrow.. my best 60ft. was 1.834.. the car runs runs a 12.7 @109 while missing fourth.. i'm thinking i need either stock height/rate springs or even drag springs.. also drag shocks.. and should i be launching at a lower rpm? any help to get my car to hook would be appreciated.. thanks guys
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: Hickory, NC
Car: 1991 Camaro RS, 1993 Camaro Z-28
Engine: what engine, LT1
Transmission: did it come with one, 4l60
Axle/Gears: They spin (most of the time)
Swap the lowering springs for more of a drag spring, lakewood 70/30s if it is driving daily or if not, 90/10s. And why do you launch at such a high rpm??
It may help alittle to launch at a lower rpm.
It may help alittle to launch at a lower rpm.
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Originally Posted by 5678TA
ok if any of you see this, how the heck do you guys get your cars to hook that good????? ok this is my setup, 385sbc about 450-475hp, centerforce dual friction clutch, 5-speed, 9" with 3.89gears, BMR LCA's, spohn torque arm, hotchkis panhard, all adjustable, 10 point cage without doorbars, subframe connectors, 26x8.5 M/T slicks, eibach sportline drop springs, monroe sensatrac shocks and struts, 1inch rear swaybar.. i launch at 4800-5100.. the thing spins the slicks like no tomorrow.. my best 60ft. was 1.834.. the car runs runs a 12.7 @109 while missing fourth.. i'm thinking i need either stock height/rate springs or even drag springs.. also drag shocks.. and should i be launching at a lower rpm? any help to get my car to hook would be appreciated.. thanks guys
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Originally Posted by jbenge
Heres the newest pic of mine from the NFME event at IRP.
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 60
From: Danville, IN
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 Bolt, 3.42
Originally Posted by mw66nova
thank you for my new background 

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drptop70ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
3
Oct 4, 2015 09:44 PM
punkmaster98
Interior Parts for Sale
0
Sep 8, 2015 09:45 PM





