Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

340lph in tank, 8:1 FMU, 24lb SVO's.. enough fuel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2002, 09:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jeremy_84_F41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula L98
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73:1
340lph in tank, 8:1 FMU, 24lb SVO's.. enough fuel?

Ok, I'm finishing up my plans for the fuel system side of my car to get this blower setup going. I'm using 24lb injectors for now because, well, that's what I have, and I'm on a budget. I'm also only looking at 6-8psi on a stock engine, so it's nothing radical right now, maybe 340 or 350hp at the crank, but eventually it will be much more (yeah yeah, just like everyone says, I know)..

Anyway, I see that Vortech sells an 8:1 FMU in their kits for the stock engines, so I know they're figuring on 22lb injectors, and they include a 155lph inline booster pump in their 3rdgen kits (seems sorta weak, but whatever). So, I'm thinking, ok, I'll buy the 8:1 FMU (or maybe the adjustable one, but the standard one is half the price), and I'm looking at this fuel pump.. http://www.racetronix.com/product/RX..._Pump_Kit.html I figure a high flow, high pressure in-tank is the better way to go (and cheaper), than to use a 255lph intank with a booster, or a stock pump with a booster.. even though some people swear this is ok, I don't know. I like the fact that the Buick guys swear by these pumps, and well, they're faster than I am, so I'll listen to them. So, that takes care of the fuel pump and FMU.. but obviously, this is going to be a lot of fuel pressure.. am I going to possibly have TOO much fuel for this basically stock engine?

I know an FMU really isn't optimal but I'm stuck with the stock GM computer right now (speed density car).

Thoughts? Am I going about this wrong? Maybe I don't need such a large FMU with the bigger injectors at this point? When my setup gets more extreme, I'll get injectors that are more suited to the application, so I think I can keep the same FMU down the road as well.

Thanks guys..

Last edited by Jeremy_84_F41; 07-23-2002 at 04:49 PM.
Old 07-22-2002, 11:35 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
posi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: richmond,ca
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I installed the walbro gss340m that is for superchagers and the hot-wire kit from racetronix. that pump will feed a ten second car.I have 24 pound injectors on my camaro that sc,also no inline fuel pump will be needed the gss340m will push what is needed
Old 07-23-2002, 12:07 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 340m pump will MAX out a 10 second car....not support one. 125mph is about the limit for the one pump then you can add another or add a boost a pump
Old 07-23-2002, 03:52 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jeremy_84_F41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula L98
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73:1
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
the 340m pump will MAX out a 10 second car....not support one. 125mph is about the limit for the one pump then you can add another or add a boost a pump
That's really no problem, I doubt my car will ever see anything faster than 12's, I just want the boost because of my altitude, plus the way it enhances the powerband is awesome compared to just building an all-motor engine for the same basic power level.

So, considering I doubt I'll ever see 125mph traps, the 340 should be great. If I ever have to go faster, I'll look into sumping my tank and running an Aeromotive pump and larger lines, since I'm sure the stock lines become a huge restriction at that power level.

I'm still stuck on whether or not the FMU will be too much pressure at that ratio.. I guess the best solution right now might be to run an adjustable style, so I can dial it in exactly as I need it, or at least to get fairly close so I don't kill the engine right away..
Old 07-23-2002, 07:48 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member
 
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: chi-town
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to let you know you.....as the fuel pressure rises the fuel flow goes down

i'd just get some larger injectors, a custom program, and the in-tank. But using the FMU WILL work, it just isn't the best thing for the injectors
Old 07-23-2002, 11:30 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jeremy_84_F41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula L98
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73:1
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
Just to let you know you.....as the fuel pressure rises the fuel flow goes down

i'd just get some larger injectors, a custom program, and the in-tank. But using the FMU WILL work, it just isn't the best thing for the injectors
I agree, I was looking at the flow chart or whatever for the 307 pump, and you can see clearly that the volume goes down a LOT when the pressure gets higher. But, the 340 pump is supposedly designed for forced induction, and gives a higher volume of fuel even above 60psi.

The reason an FMU or a programmable computer that is boost sensing (like with a 2 bar MAP sensor) is more favorable to me compared to a custom burn is because I drive the car at different altitudes.. mainly 4500-5000ft at my home, but occasionally up in the mountains, and occasionally sea level (Northern California).. a custom burn that is perfect up here at 5000ft would be rich at 8000ft, and would be lean at sea level. I don't want to make different chips for different altitudes, where something that is boost sensing would sense the extra airflow or lack of airflow and compensate without me having to think about it. I might still go with a larger injector, but above 30lb/hr or so, I'm worried about it running rich at idle with no boost, and loading up.. the computer can only compensate so much without a custom chip. I really don't think I'll need that much injector for that power level anyway, but maybe I'm mistaken.. supposedly a 24lb/hr injector can support 350hp, and that's figured on ~40psi, where it would obviously be higher with an FMU. As for not being good for the injectors.. I guess I'll just have to upgrade if I ruin these.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
08-25-2015 08:05 AM
Winchester1094
Tech / General Engine
0
08-18-2015 10:23 AM
AkDrifted
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
08-17-2015 07:45 PM
kyleb24
Camaros for Sale
2
08-15-2015 08:24 AM
Firechicken86
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-12-2015 10:07 PM



Quick Reply: 340lph in tank, 8:1 FMU, 24lb SVO's.. enough fuel?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.