Anyone ever supercharge a L6...
Anyone ever supercharge a L6...
Anyone ever supercharge a L6 250cid using a centerfugal? Someone mentioned a GM factory blower, but I dig spinners more...the look and all.
I'm thinking of going distributorless (is that even possible with these engines?) so that the centerfugal can take up the space where the HEI is sittin...
I'm runnin' a TBI now and am cool with the juice it's making. Don't want to go back to a carb. Someone suggested switching the ECM for a typhoon ECM. I have to agree with the hometown, any other ideas...
Later on hometowns...CHEVYTOWN
I'm thinking of going distributorless (is that even possible with these engines?) so that the centerfugal can take up the space where the HEI is sittin...
I'm runnin' a TBI now and am cool with the juice it's making. Don't want to go back to a carb. Someone suggested switching the ECM for a typhoon ECM. I have to agree with the hometown, any other ideas...
Later on hometowns...CHEVYTOWN
Last edited by CHEVYTOWN; Nov 9, 2002 at 02:31 AM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: In the corner of my mind!
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Once the rotating assemb;y is figured out the I6 punched out .040 over turboed should be a beast. The head will be the downfall though!
I'm thinking of going aluminum on the cylinder head like these hometowns...not as crazy as them, but more for the street.
www.inlinesix.com
This beast is an all aluminum 292 that is bored and stroked to 342cid and mechanically fuel injected. This MONSTER with a turbo would be LOCO!
CHEVYTOWN
www.inlinesix.com
This beast is an all aluminum 292 that is bored and stroked to 342cid and mechanically fuel injected. This MONSTER with a turbo would be LOCO!
CHEVYTOWN
Last edited by CHEVYTOWN; Nov 9, 2002 at 12:23 AM.
My original concern was that the Typhoon ECM would drastically read the data from the sensors differently, although the V6 and L6 are very similar in displacement. This L6 is 4.2 Liters. I'm gonna check the firing order, vacuum #'s and the like on the V6, not sure if this will make any difference, but it's part of the research I guess...
Thanks for you input hometown...
Thanks for you input hometown...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: In the corner of my mind!
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
The only problem I forsee is the firing order and some of the sensors wont have mounting holes in the I6 engine. The I6 by design is better. The cylnder head layout is critical. If you are looking for modest power the stock cylinder ported with bigger valves should do. The crank throws are evenly spaced and better distribute the abuse over the entire main. Good caps are definately in order as well as rods and pistons.
Sounds like a good plan to me. Good luck!
Sounds like a good plan to me. Good luck!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
A 749 would work just fine. Provided the memcal matched the numbers of cylinders, ei 4 cyl memcal/ 4 popper, 6 cyl memcal 6 cyl, etc. The ECM could care less wether the engine is an inline or V, It doesn't know, or care. What maybe a problem is I dont know of anyone running a 749 with a TBI, but it probibly would work. Mine runs fine on a Eaton blown TPI. Just need to get the drivline done to do some road tuning.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
15
Nov 10, 2015 06:17 AM





